Evaluation of Pain Reduction in the Administration of Saline Injections by the Usage of Pneumatic Skin Flattening
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00503087|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified August 2007 by PalJect Ltd..
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : July 18, 2007
Last Update Posted : August 8, 2007
|First Submitted Date ICMJE||July 17, 2007|
|First Posted Date ICMJE||July 18, 2007|
|Last Update Posted Date||August 8, 2007|
|Start Date ICMJE||August 2007|
|Primary Completion Date||Not Provided|
|Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||VAS pain scaling differences between saline injection with PSF and without PSF [ Time Frame: Immediately after each injection ]|
|Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Same as current|
|Change History||Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00503087 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site|
|Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Brief Title ICMJE||Evaluation of Pain Reduction in the Administration of Saline Injections by the Usage of Pneumatic Skin Flattening|
|Official Title ICMJE||Evaluation of Pain Reduction in the Administration of Saline Injections by the Usage of Pneumatic Skin Flattening (PSF)|
Each participant will be administered 2 injections of saline - the first in the right gluteal area and the second in the left gluteal area. Both injections will be administered intra-muscularly by the same clinician. One injection will be given with vacuum (Pneumatic Skin Flattening or PSF Machine) and the other without vacuum. The order of the injections will be randomly assigned. Each subject will serve as a control for himself. Between injections a 30 min pause will be given to minimize pain sensation bias of the previous injection. Immediately after each injection the pain level will be assessed by the VAS scale. The researcher assessing the pain will be blinded for the type of injection given. The evaluation of the pain reduction will be made by comparison of the pain level with and without the application of the PSF.
Hypothesis: PSF Technique will reduce the pain associated with saline injections.
Injections are currently the gold-standard for administrating various medications parenterally. The most significant side-effect related to injections is the accompanying pain. Injection pain is related to the penetration of the skin by the needle and to the mechanical and chemical effects of the drug during and after its injection. This pain remains a major obstacle in medication administration in children as well as in other populations subject to needle-phobia because of the pain experience. The associated pain may thus prevent optimized medical care for these patients.
Current methods to alleviate immediate pain include the utilization of topical anesthesia whereas some patients do not utilize any form of pain relief and simply endure the pain of the injection. Other methods for pain reduction are taking advantage of the applying pressure or vibration to alleviate pain. These methods have resulted in a number of pain relieving devices currently on the market. Such predicate devices primarily involve vibration devices commonly used to alleviate the injection pain. Published data suggests possible use of pressure application mechanism in pain alleviation related to injections.
We suggest here, for the first time, the use of the Pneumatic Skin Flattening (PSF) technology for alleviation of pain associated with injections. The PSF technology is currently used worldwide in the FDA cleared Serenity device (Serenity, Inolase Ltd.) for pain reduction in hair removal. The device generates contact and compression between a transparent sapphire window and the skin. The compression creatures pressure signal which, based on the gate theory, is though to depress the pain associated with the hair removal treatment. We assume the same mechanism would apply for the reduction of pain associated with injections.
Comparison: Intra-Subject pain level change of injection with PSF and without PSF
|Study Type ICMJE||Interventional|
|Study Phase||Phase 1|
|Study Design ICMJE||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
|Study Arms||Not Provided|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
|Recruitment Status ICMJE||Unknown status|
|Estimated Enrollment ICMJE||20|
|Estimated Completion Date||July 2008|
|Primary Completion Date||Not Provided|
|Eligibility Criteria ICMJE||
|Ages||18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)|
|Accepts Healthy Volunteers||Yes|
|Contacts ICMJE||Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects|
|Listed Location Countries ICMJE||Israel|
|Removed Location Countries|
|NCT Number ICMJE||NCT00503087|
|Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE||TASMC 07- TL -268 CTIL|
|Has Data Monitoring Committee||Yes|
|U.S. FDA-regulated Product||Not Provided|
|IPD Sharing Statement||Not Provided|
|Responsible Party||Not Provided|
|Study Sponsor ICMJE||PalJect Ltd.|
|Collaborators ICMJE||Not Provided|
|PRS Account||PalJect Ltd.|
|Verification Date||August 2007|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP