We updated the design of this site on September 25th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Usefulness of 64 Slice Multi-Detector Computed Tomography as a First Diagnostic Approach in Acute Chest Pain Patients

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00431886
First Posted: February 6, 2007
Last Update Posted: June 21, 2011
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by:
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
February 5, 2007
February 6, 2007
June 21, 2011
April 2006
Not Provided
  • Admission rate
  • Unnecessary admission rate
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00431886 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Stay time in emergency department
  • Diagnostic accuracy
  • MACE
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Usefulness of 64 Slice Multi-Detector Computed Tomography as a First Diagnostic Approach in Acute Chest Pain Patients
Usefulness of 64 Slice Multi-Detector Computed Tomography as a First Diagnostic Approach in Acute Chest Pain Patients
The purpose of this study is to determine the usefulness of 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography as a first diagnostic approach in acute chest pain patients in emergency room
We prospectively enrolled the patients with acute chest pain who visited ED. Exclusion criteria were myocardial infarction (MI) with ST elevation, unstable vital sign, uncontrolled arrhythmia, renal dysfunction, hypersensitivity to contrast media and pregnancy. Patients were allocated into 3 categories based on history, physical exam, and electrocardiogram: 1) definite angina with uncertainty of regarding MI (high risk), 2) probable angina (intermediate risk), 3) low likelihood of angina (low risk), and then randomized to either receive MDCT immediately (MDCT group), or not (control). We compared diagnostic accuracy, length of stay in ER, admission rate, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and clinical diagnosis in 1 month after discharge from ED.
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Chest Pains
Procedure: 64 multi-detector computed tomography
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
400
December 2007
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute chest pain patient visiting emergency room

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unstable vital sign
  • renal failure
  • ST elevation myocardial infarction
  • uncontrolled arrhythmia
  • hypersensitivity to contrast dye
  • clinically no possibility of angina
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
19 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Korea, Republic of
 
 
NCT00431886
B-0603/031-009
No
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Not Provided
Study Director: Huk-Jae Chang, MD Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
February 2007

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP