Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 1 of 1 for:    NCT00428597
Previous Study | Return to List | Next Study

A Study Of Sunitinib Compared To Placebo For Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Islet Cell Tumors

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00428597
Recruitment Status : Terminated (Refer to Detailed Description.)
First Posted : January 30, 2007
Results First Posted : October 11, 2010
Last Update Posted : October 11, 2010
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Pfizer

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE January 29, 2007
First Posted Date  ICMJE January 30, 2007
Results First Submitted Date  ICMJE April 15, 2010
Results First Posted Date  ICMJE October 11, 2010
Last Update Posted Date October 11, 2010
Study Start Date  ICMJE June 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date April 2009   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: September 16, 2010)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: From time of randomization through Day 1 of Week 5, Week 9, and then every 8 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death ]
Time from randomization to first progression of disease (PD) or death for any reason in the absence of documented PD. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus first randomization date +1) divided by 30.4.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: January 29, 2007)
Progression free survival
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: September 16, 2010)
  • Number of Subjects With Objective Response [ Time Frame: From time of randomization through Day 1 of Week 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter ]
    Objective response = subjects with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for at least 4 weeks, confirmed by repeat tumor assessments. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as a > = 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
  • Duration of Response (DR) [ Time Frame: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Week 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death due to any cause ]
    Time in months from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. DR was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.4.
  • Time-to-Tumor Response (TTR) [ Time Frame: From time of randomization through Day 1 of Week 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter ]
    Time from randomization to the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed.
  • Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: From start of study treatment up to 22 months ]
    Time in months from time of randomization to date of death due to any cause. The median number of months is provided; however, the study was terminated early. OS data was not mature by the time of analysis. Median OS time cannot be accurately estimated by Kaplan-Meier method for either treatment arm.
  • European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of LifeQuestionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) - Global Quality of Life (QoL) Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Cognitive Functioning Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Emotional Functioning Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Physical Functioning Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Role Functioning Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Social Functioning Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Appetite Loss Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Constipation Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Diarrhea Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Dyspnea Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Fatigue Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Financial Difficulties Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Insomnia Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Nausea and Vomiting Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 - Pain Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: January 29, 2007)
Overall survival Tumor response Duration of response Time to response Safety and tolerability Patient-reported outcomes
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE A Study Of Sunitinib Compared To Placebo For Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Islet Cell Tumors
Official Title  ICMJE A Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind Study Of Sunitinib (SU011248, SUTENT) Versus Placebo In Patients With Progressive Advanced/Metastatic Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Islet Cell Tumors
Brief Summary

This study randomized patients with advanced pancreatic islet cell tumors to receive either sunitinib or placebo. Patients who were randomized to sunitinib received 37.5 mg of sunitinib daily, those randomized to placebo received a tablet that looked similar but had no active drug. Neither the patient or the doctor knew whether the patient was receiving sunitinib or placebo. Patients were followed to determine the status and size of their tumors, survival, quality of life and safety of the drug.

The study was designed to detect a 50% improvement in median PFS[Progression Free Survival] with 90% power and was to enroll 340 subjects. An interim analysis was planned when 130 events had occurred, and the final analysis was to be conducted when 260 events had occurred.

Study A6181111 was stopped early during the enrollment period because of a clear and clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy for the sunitinib treatment arm as recommended by the DMC [Data Monitoring Committee]. The actual number of subjects enrolled was 171 and the actual number of PFS events recorded was 81 PFS events. The decision to terminate the study was not based on safety concerns related to sunitinib administration.

Detailed Description The study was terminated on 11 March 2009 because the independent Data Monitoring Committee determined that the study had met its primary endpoint in demonstrating improvement in progression-free survival. The decision to terminate the trial was not based on safety concerns related to sunitinib administration.
Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Phase 3
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE
  • Carcinoma, Islet Cell
  • Carcinoma, Pancreas
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Drug: sunitinib malate
    • sunitinib malate oral starting dose 37.5 mg daily (continuous dosing).
    • Dose may be decreased to 25 mg daily in case of adverse events.
    • It may be increased to 50 mg daily if no response is seen after 8 weeks on treatment.
    • Dosing to continue until unacceptable toxicity, progression of disease, death, or study termination.
  • Drug: Placebo
    Placebo to match sunitinib taken daily (oral) on the same schedule as active agent below.
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: A
    Intervention: Drug: sunitinib malate
  • Placebo Comparator: B
    Intervention: Drug: Placebo
Publications *

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Terminated
Actual Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: July 14, 2009)
171
Original Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: January 29, 2007)
340
Actual Study Completion Date  ICMJE April 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date April 2009   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Well-differentiated advanced/metastatic pancreatic islet cell tumor
  • Tumor has shown progression within the past year.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current treatment with any chemotherapy, chemoembolization therapy, immunotherapy, or investigational anticancer agent other than somatostatin analogues
  • Prior treatment with any tyrosine kinase inhibitors or anti-VEGF[Vascular endothelial growth factor] angiogenic inhibitors.
  • Prior treatment with non-VEGF-targeted angiogenic inhibitors is permitted
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE Australia,   Belgium,   Canada,   France,   Germany,   Italy,   Korea, Republic of,   Spain,   Taiwan,   United Kingdom,   United States
Removed Location Countries Colombia,   Denmark,   Netherlands
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT00428597
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE A6181111
Has Data Monitoring Committee Yes
U.S. FDA-regulated Product Not Provided
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE Not Provided
Responsible Party Director, Clinical Trial Disclosure Group, Pfizer Inc
Study Sponsor  ICMJE Pfizer
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE
Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center Pfizer
PRS Account Pfizer
Verification Date September 2010

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP