This site became the new ClinicalTrials.gov on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Give us feedback

Community-Effectiveness of the Distribution of Insecticide-Treated Bed Nets Through Social Marketing Antenatal Care Services in Malaria Control in Rural Burkina Faso

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Heidelberg University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00355225
First received: July 19, 2006
Last updated: October 6, 2006
Last verified: July 2006
History of Changes
July 19, 2006
October 6, 2006
Not Provided
Not Provided
  • ITN coverage in households 12 and 24 months after the start of the interventions
  • ITN use during pregnancy and infancy
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00355225 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Costs per malaria case and per DALY prevented
  • Self-reported information on ANC visits
  • Insecticide content on ITN and mortality of vector mosquitoes over time
  • Acceptance of health staff and population
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Community-Effectiveness of the Distribution of Insecticide-Treated Bed Nets Through Social Marketing Antenatal Care Services in Malaria Control in Rural Burkina Faso
Not Provided
The study aims at assessing which of two distribution channels for insecticide treated bendnets (ITNs), social marketing vs. social marketing coupled with free distribution through ante-natal care, is most effective in reaching groups at high risk of malaria, i.e. pregnant women and children under 5.
The hypothesis that insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) effects may not be long-lasting in young children living in areas of intense malaria transmission due to interactions with the immunologi-cal development has now been refuted in a number of studies including the D4 study. The highly controversial question remains how African programmes can best reach a sustainable high coverage with ITNs in young children and pregnant women. Against this background it is planned to implement a cluster randomised controlled trial in Nouna Health District in Burkina Faso. Twenty-two peripheral health centres and their catchment areas will be randomised to (1) ITN provision to the general population through social marketing and (2) ITN provision to the general population through social marketing plus free provision to all pregnant women through antenatal services. The primary outcomes are ITN coverage in households and ITN use during pregnancy and infancy.
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Educational/Counseling/Training
Malaria
Procedure: ITN distribution channel
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being one of 25 primary health facility catchment areas in the Nouna Health District, Burkina Faso

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being outside one of 25 primary health facility catchment areas in the Nouna Health District, Burkina Faso
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Child, Adult, Senior
Not Provided
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Not Provided
 
 
NCT00355225
SFB544D4
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Heidelberg University
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Olaf Mueller, MD, MPH Heidelberg University
Heidelberg University
July 2006

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP