This site became the new ClinicalTrials.gov on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Give us feedback

Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer and Fallopian Tube Cancer Patients Using Complementary Alternative Medicine

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Randy Shaver Cancer Research Fund
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00293293
First received: February 16, 2006
Last updated: May 23, 2017
Last verified: May 2017
February 16, 2006
May 23, 2017
May 2005
April 2009   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Quality of Life Comparison - Average FACT-O Scoring in Chemotherapy Alone vs. Chemotherapy Plus Complementary Alternative Medicine (CAM) [ Time Frame: Prior to Cycle 1 (Day -2 to +1), Every 3rd cycle (1 cycle = approx 21 days) and 6 Months Post Chemotherapy ]
    Measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Ovarian (FACT-O) questionnaire was used to assess patients' quality of life before each chemotherapy cycle. It is a standardized self-administered questionnaire measuring many aspects of quality of life (0 to 4; Not at all, A little bit, Some-what, Quite a bit, Very much) as related to patients with ovarian cancers. The quality of life measures include the total FACT-O score (minimum value 0, maximum value 200). Questionnaires are recoded in the final analysis phase so that a higher score reflected more adverse effects on quality of life.
  • Comparison of Mental Health Inventory (MHI) Questionnaire Results - Average for Chemotherapy Alone vs. Chemotherapy Plus CAM [ Time Frame: Prior to Cycle 1 (Day -2 to +1), Every 3rd cycle (1 cycle = approx 21 days) and 6 Months Post Chemotherapy ]
    The MHI asks questions about how the consumer is feeling and coping with usual life activities. It provides measurable information about the consumer's wellbeing (anxiety, depression, loss of emotional control, general positive affect and emotional ties). A single score based on all items designed as high level summary index of the person's mental health status. High scores on the Mental Health Index indicate greater psychological well being and relatively less psychological distress (range is 38-240).
Not Provided
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00293293 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Number of Patients With Delays In Receiving Chemotherapy Alone [ Time Frame: Prior to Chemotherapy (Day -2 to +1) through Cycle 6 Chemotherapy (Approx. 168-180 Days) ]
    Number of patients who had to delay their chemotherapy treatments due to side effects.
  • Number of Patients With Delays In Receiving Chemotherapy Plus CAM [ Time Frame: Prior to Chemotherapy (Day -2 to +1) through Cycle 6 Chemotherapy (Approx. 168-180 Days) ]
    Number of patients who had to delay their chemotherapy treatments and or complementary alternative medicine due to side effects.
  • Average Number of Anti-Emetic Prescriptions Used After Chemotherapy Alone [ Time Frame: Prior to Chemotherapy (Day -2 to +1) through Cycle 6 Chemotherapy (Approx. 168-180 Days) ]
    Determined by averaging the total number of anti-emetic prescriptions given per patient after receiving chemotherapy.
  • Average Number of Anti-Emetic Prescriptions Used After Chemotherapy + CAM [ Time Frame: Prior to Chemotherapy (Day -2 to +1) through Cycle 6 Chemotherapy (Approx. 168-180 Days) ]
    Determined by averaging the total number of anti-emetic prescriptions given per patient after chemotherapy and complementary alternative medicine.
  • Average Anti-Emetic Dose Use After Chemotherapy Alone [ Time Frame: Prior to Chemotherapy (Day -2 to +1) through Cycle 6 Chemotherapy (Approx. 168-180 Days) ]
    Determined by averaging the total dose of anti-emetic medications given (in milligrams) per patient.
  • Average Anti-Emetic Dose Use After Chemotherapy Plus CAM [ Time Frame: Prior to Chemotherapy (Day -2 to +1) through Cycle 6 Chemotherapy (Approx. 168-180 Days) ]
    Determined by averaging the total dose of anti-emetic medications given (in milligrams) per patient after receiving chemotherapy and complementary alternative medicine.
  • Average Natural Killer Cell Count Levels Before Chemotherapy Alone [ Time Frame: Prior to Chemotherapy (Day -2 to +1) through Cycle 6 Chemotherapy (Approx. 168-180 Days) ]
    Natural killer cells are identified as CD3 (-), CD56(+) and CD16 (+). Phenotypic analysis and measurement of NK cells (NK cell count in mm^3 drawn before chemotherapy) using flow cytometry and specific mAb.
  • Average Natural Killer Cell Count Levels Before Chemotherapy and CAM [ Time Frame: Prior to Chemotherapy (Day -2 to +1) through Cycle 6 Chemotherapy (Approx. 168-180 Days) ]
    Natural killer cells are identified as CD3 (-), CD56(+) and CD16 (+). Phenotypic analysis and measurement of NK cells (NK cell count in mm^3 drawn before chemotherapy) using flow cytometry and specific mAb.
  • Comparison of Number of Patients Having Infection After Chemotherapy Alone vs. Chemotherapy Plus CAM [ Time Frame: Prior to Chemotherapy (Day -2 to +1) through Cycle 6 Chemotherapy (Approx. 168-180 Days) ]
    Number of patients that had infections requiring antibiotic therapy or admission to the hospital that received either chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus complementary alternative medicine.
  • Comparison of Number of Patients Who Were Hospitalized After Chemotherapy Alone vs. Chemotherapy Plus CAM [ Time Frame: Prior to Chemotherapy (Day -2 to +1) through Cycle 6 Chemotherapy (Approx. 168-180 Days) ]
    Count of patients who were admitted to the hospital after receiving chemotherapy treatment or chemotherapy plus complementary alternative medicine.
  • Comparison of Average White Blood Cell Count in Chemotherapy Alone vs. Chemotherapy Plus CAM [ Time Frame: Prior to Chemotherapy through 6th Treatment with Chemotherapy (average 6 months) ]
    Determined from white blood cell counts collected during treatment phase of study; average applied.
  • Comparison of Average T-lymphocytes and B-lymphocytes for Chemotherapy Alone vs. Chemotherapy Plus CAM [ Time Frame: Prior to Chemotherapy (Day -2 to +1) through Cycle 6 Chemotherapy (Approx. 168-180 Days) ]
    Average count determined - collected during treatment phase of study - Includes T-helper/inducer, CD4 and CD8 cells; number of CD4 and CD8 cells (in mm^3).
  • Comparison of Average Salivary IgA Level in Chemotherapy Alone vs. Chemotherapy Plus CAM [ Time Frame: Prior to Chemotherapy (Day -2 to +1) through Cycle 6 Chemotherapy (Approx. 168-180 Days) ]
    Determined from collection of saliva during treatment phase of study and recorded in mg/dL units.
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer and Fallopian Tube Cancer Patients Using Complementary Alternative Medicine
Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer and Fallopian Tube Cancer Patients Using Complementary Alternative Medicine

RATIONALE: Chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel and carboplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Hypnosis, massage therapy, and healing touch may improve the quality of life of patients who are undergoing chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying how well giving hypnosis, massage therapy and healing touch changes outcomes in women receiving chemotherapy for newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cavity cancer.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine whether quality of life is improved in patients with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cavity cancer receiving hypnosis, massage therapy, and healing touch and standard chemotherapy as compared to patients receiving standard chemotherapy alone.

Secondary

  • Determine changes in immunologic response markers, chemotherapy side effects, and complication rates in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I (standard therapy): Patients undergo standard chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer.
  • Arm II (standard therapy with complementary alternative medicine): Patients undergo chemotherapy as in arm I. Patients also undergo massage over approximately 30 minutes and healing touch therapy over approximately 30 minutes with each course of chemotherapy 1-6 and hypnosis over 30-60 minutes during courses 1, 2, and 4.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline, during courses 3 and 6 of chemotherapy, and then 6 months after completion of study treatment.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 6 months.

Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: No masking
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Ovarian Cancer
  • Peritoneal Primary Cancer
  • Fallopian Tube Cancer
  • Other: healing touch
    The practitioner performed a structured interview with the patient both a verbal assessment and an energy/physical assessment using pendulum and hand scan techniques. The practitioner will then provide the intervention which will consist of: chakra connection, magnetic passes (hands still and in motion), magnetic clearing.
    Other Name: energy-based therapy
  • Other: massage therapy
    Standard massage techniques will be employed over the head, neck, shoulders, back, hands, and/or feet areas. The intensity and rapidity of massage movements will be individualized to the patient's comfort level.
    Other Name: massage
  • Other: hypnosis
    Steps: 1) begins with a progressive relaxation induction; 2) suggestions for deepening are then provided; 3) offered suggestions to increase comfort with medical procedures; 4) suggestion for enhanced capacity for coping will be given as an ego strengthening suggestion, with a post-hypnotic suggestion for increasing comfort/success in coping each time.
    Other Name: mind-body intervention procedure
  • Drug: Standard chemotherapy
    Patients will receive 6 cycles of taxane and platinum therapy as prescribed by their treating physician. Chemotherapy treatment is not part of this study.
    Other Names:
    • Taxane
    • Platinum
  • Active Comparator: Chemotherapy Alone
    Patients receiving 6 cycles of taxane and platinum therapy for ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer by their treating physician. Chemotherapy administration is not administered as part of this protocol.
    Intervention: Drug: Standard chemotherapy
  • Experimental: Standard Chemotherapy + CAM
    Patients receiving 6 cycles of taxane and platinum therapy for ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer with additional complementary alternative medicine - CAM (healing touch, hypnosis and massage therapy). Chemotherapy administration is not administered as part of this protocol.
    Interventions:
    • Other: healing touch
    • Other: massage therapy
    • Other: hypnosis
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
43
January 2010
April 2009   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer, any pathologic type or stage, who will receive 6 cycles of chemotherapy.
  • Patients must have signed an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous cancer other than skin cancer
  • Previous chemotherapy experience
  • Active substance abuse
  • Schizophrenia
  • Pregnant or lactating
Sexes Eligible for Study: Female
Child, Adult, Senior
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
 
NCT00293293
2000NT790
UMN-WCC-30 ( Other Identifier: Women's Cancer Center, University of Minnesota )
0012M77821 ( Other Identifier: IRB, University of Minnesota )
No
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
Randy Shaver Cancer Research Fund
Study Chair: Patricia L. Judson, MD Moffitt
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
May 2017

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP