Original Query: ALL
Previous Study | Return to List | Next Study

Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT00209417
Recruitment Status : Terminated (Supported by preliminary interim analysis. Not based on any safety signals in study or any quality issues that could affect efficacy of the product.)
First Posted : September 21, 2005
Results First Posted : October 10, 2014
Last Update Posted : October 17, 2014
Examination Management Services Inc.
Quintiles, Inc.
Averion International Corporation
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
GE Healthcare

August 24, 2005
September 21, 2005
October 2, 2014
October 10, 2014
October 17, 2014
June 2005
May 2011   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Assessment of the Incidence Rate of Contrast Medium-Induced Nephropathy (CIN) Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients With Impaired Renal Function. [ Time Frame: From baseline up to 3 days post contrast administration. ]

The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of CIN, defined as an intra-individual increase in serum creatinine (SCr) of greater than or equal to 44.2 µmol/L (greater than or equal to 0.5 mg/dL).

Subjects with a pre-contrast (baseline) serum creatinine value greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL for males and greater than or equal to 1.3 mg/dL for females or eGFR of less than or equal to 50 mL/min/1.73m squared, and a post-contrast serum creatinine value available on days 2 or 3, administered greater than or equal to100 mL or greater than or equal to 1.5 mL/kg bodyweight IMP, without presence of any major protocol violations, and without evidence of other causes inducing acute renal dysfunction.

Contrast-induced nephropathy up to day 3. The main secondary outcomes are changes in serum creatinine up to day 7
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00209417 on Archive Site
Assessment of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-enhanced Multi-detector-row Helical Computed Tomography (MDCT) Examination. [ Time Frame: Within 2, 3 and 7 days post contrast administration. ]
Overall Image Quality rated as "Excellent, Good, Sufficient or Insufficient Poor" by radiologists blinded to the contrast administration.
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography
GEHC Has Decided Not to Provide This Detail But Will Rely on the Brief Title.
It is well known that X-ray contrast media can affect kidney function in some patients, especially when administered intra-arterially, and patients who already suffer from reduced kidney function and diabetes mellitus may be at increased risk. It is widely accepted to use low-osmolar or iso-osmolar contrast media, especially in patients at risk for contrast media-induced nephropathy. However, little is known about the intravenous use of X-ray contrast media in risk patients, such as contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects on kidney function of two contrast media, the iso-osmolar iodixanol and the low-osmolar iopamidol in patients at risk of kidney damage associated with the injection of contrast media. Due to the iso-osmolar feature, it is expected less influence on renal function following administration of iodixanol. A standard hydration procedure, based on available guidelines will be given to all patients to prevent negative effects on the kidneys. Serum creatinine (SCr ) concentrations will be measured before and up to 7 days after contrast media administration to evaluate the effects on renal function.
GEHC has decided not to provide this detail
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Renal Insufficiency
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Drug: Iodixanol 320-Arm 1
    Other Name: Visipaque
  • Drug: Iopamidol 300-Arm 2
    Other Name: Isovue
  • Active Comparator: Iodixanol 320-Arm 1
    Iodixanol 320 mg I/mL
    Intervention: Drug: Iodixanol 320-Arm 1
  • Active Comparator: Iopamidol 300-Arm 2
    Iopamidol 300 mg I/mL
    Intervention: Drug: Iopamidol 300-Arm 2
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
July 2011
May 2011   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a combination of diabetes mellitus (type I or II) and renal impairment who are referred for a contrast-enhanced CT examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent administration of potentially nephroprotective or nephrotoxic drugs is not permitted.
  • Patients undergoing dialysis or kidney transplantation will not be included.
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United Kingdom,   United States
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
GE Healthcare
GE Healthcare
  • Examination Management Services Inc.
  • Covance
  • Quintiles, Inc.
  • Averion International Corporation
Study Director: Judith A Johnson, MS, MBA GE Healthcare
GE Healthcare
October 2014

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP