We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Clinical Comparison of RPDs Retained by Conical and Galvanoformed Double Crowns.

The recruitment status of this study is unknown. The completion date has passed and the status has not been verified in more than two years.
Verified July 2005 by Heidelberg University.
Recruitment status was:  Active, not recruiting
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00176215
First Posted: September 15, 2005
Last Update Posted: December 9, 2005
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by:
Heidelberg University
September 13, 2005
September 15, 2005
December 9, 2005
May 2003
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
No Changes Posted
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Clinical Comparison of RPDs Retained by Conical and Galvanoformed Double Crowns.
Not Provided
The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to investigate the clinical performance and complication rate of RPDs (Removable partial dentures) retained on conventional conical double crowns in comparison to galvanoformed telscopic double crowns. Additionally the OHIP (Oral Health related Qualitiy of Life)and the abrasion of the teeth were investigated.
Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Denture, Partial, Removable
  • Dental Prosthesis Retention
  • Oral Health
  • Tooth Abrasion
Procedure: survival failure of more than 20 %
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Unknown status
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for RPDs retained by double crowns; 2 to 6 Abutment teeth;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • limited contractual capability and absence of consent of the patient
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Not Provided
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Germany
 
 
NCT00176215
CG-FL-1
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Heidelberg University
Not Provided
Study Chair: Christiane Grossmann, DDS Heidelberg University
Principal Investigator: Franziska Lehmann, DDS Heidelberg University
Heidelberg University
July 2005

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP