We updated the design of this site on September 25th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Ultrathin Versus Conventional Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Unsedated Patient With or Without Local Pharyngeal Anaesthesia

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00164996
First Posted: September 14, 2005
Last Update Posted: February 17, 2012
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by:
Chinese University of Hong Kong
September 10, 2005
September 14, 2005
February 17, 2012
September 2004
September 2010   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
patient's tolerance and anxiety in visual analog scale (VAS) score
Patient's tolerance and anxiety in VAS score
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00164996 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
patient's satisfaction; procedure time; complications
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Ultrathin Versus Conventional Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Unsedated Patient With or Without Local Pharyngeal Anaesthesia
Comparison of Ultrathin Versus Conventional Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Unsedated Patients With or Without Local Pharyngeal Anaesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether an ultrathin endoscope will improve a patient's tolerance during the procedure. In addition, this study will look at whether local pharyngeal anaesthesia is necessary during ultrathin endoscopy.
Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Dyspepsia
  • Procedure: Local pharyngeal anaesthesia
  • Device: Ultrathin endoscope
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
400
Not Provided
September 2010   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 18-70

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous experience of upper endoscopy
  • Allergy to local pharyngeal anaesthesia
  • Patient requesting sedation during endoscopy
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years to 70 Years   (Adult, Senior)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
China
 
 
NCT00164996
CRE 2004.312
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Wilfred Lik-Man Mui, MD Chinese University of Hong Kong
Chinese University of Hong Kong
September 2005

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP