Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Bolus of TNK-tPA (Tenecteplase, Metalyse®) With Accelerated Infusion of Rt-PA (Alteplase, Actilyse®) in Asian Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
|First Received Date ICMJE||September 7, 2005|
|Last Updated Date||October 28, 2013|
|Start Date ICMJE||March 2001|
|Primary Completion Date||Not Provided|
|Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||The percentage of patients with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow in the infarct-related artery (IRA) [ Time Frame: at 90 minutes after the start of thrombolytic treatment ]|
|Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||The percentage of patients with TIMI grade 3 flow in the infarct-related artery (IRA) at 90 minutes after the start of thrombolytic treatment|
|Change History||Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00148460 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site|
|Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE
|Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||1. Infarct-related artery patency at 90 minutes 2. The percentage of subjects with ST-segment resolution at 60 and 180 minutes 3. 30-day mortality 4. Safety 5. The effects of TNK-tPA on coagulation and fibrinogenolysis (at selected clinical sites)|
|Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Brief Title ICMJE||Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Bolus of TNK-tPA (Tenecteplase, Metalyse®) With Accelerated Infusion of Rt-PA (Alteplase, Actilyse®) in Asian Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction|
|Official Title ICMJE||A Randomised, Open-label, Multi-center, Angiographic Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Single Bolus of Tenecteplase (Metalyse®) With Accelerated Infusion of Alteplase in Asian Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction|
|Brief Summary||The objective of this trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of a single bolus of TNK-tPA (tenecteplase, Metalyse®) compared with rt-PA (alteplase, Actilyse®) in Asian patients.|
This was a randomized (1:1), open-label, multi-center, active-control, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety of TNK-tPA (tenecteplase, Metalyse®) with that of accelerated rt-PA (alteplase, Actilyse®) in Asian patients with AMI. The primary endpoint (TIMI 3 Flow) and the secondary endpoint (TIMI frame count) were evaluated in a blinded manner in the core laboratory.
Patients eligible for the trial who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria and who gave their informed consent were randomized to one of two treatment groups (i.e. TNK-tPA or accelerated rt-PA).
The study period totaled 30-37 days and included baseline, randomisation, study drug administration, in-hospital follow-up and thirty-day follow-up.
Coronary angiography was performed at 90 minutes after the start of study drug administration. 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained before randomization, between 60 to 75 minutes and 180 ± 15 minutes after the start of study drug administration, and at hospital discharge.
If the patient showed rapid and progressive hemodynamic deterioration before 90 minutes, rescue PTCA or other appropriate interventions should be performed at the discretion of the treating physician.
Following the analysis of TIMI flow and frame count at each study center, the results were carefully recorded on the CRFs. This data was stored on a compact disk or a film and labeled with the subject's study I.D. number. It was then sent with the summary worksheets and ECGs to the Angiographic Core Laboratory located at the Leuven Coordinating Center (LCC) of the University Hospital Gasthuisberg (Leuven, Belgium) for central evaluations.
The null hypothesis tested was that there was no difference between the two treatment groups: TNK-tPA (Tenecteplase, Metalyse®) and accelerated rt-PA (Actilyse®), against the alternative that there was a difference.
The primary endpoint of the study was TIMI 3 flow at 90 minutes after start of thrombolytic therapy, angiograms were evaluated in a blinded manner in a core laboratory.
|Study Type ICMJE||Interventional|
|Study Phase||Phase 3|
|Study Design ICMJE||Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Condition ICMJE||Myocardial Infarction|
|Study Arm (s)||Not Provided|
|Publications *||Not Provided|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
|Recruitment Status ICMJE||Completed|
|Estimated Completion Date||February 2006|
|Primary Completion Date||Not Provided|
|Eligibility Criteria ICMJE||
|Ages||18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Senior)|
|Accepts Healthy Volunteers||No|
|Contacts ICMJE||Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects|
|Listed Location Countries ICMJE||China, Hong Kong, Korea, Republic of|
|Removed Location Countries|
|NCT Number ICMJE||NCT00148460|
|Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE||1123.8|
|Has Data Monitoring Committee||Not Provided|
|Plan to Share Data||Not Provided|
|IPD Description||Not Provided|
|Responsible Party||Not Provided|
|Study Sponsor ICMJE||Boehringer Ingelheim|
|Collaborators ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Information Provided By||Boehringer Ingelheim|
|Verification Date||October 2013|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP