Comparison of the Effectiveness of Mobilization and Manipulation of the Thoracic Spine in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT00128869
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : August 10, 2005
Last Update Posted : May 13, 2008
Information provided by:
Newton-Wellesley Hospital

August 9, 2005
August 10, 2005
May 13, 2008
May 2005
October 2007   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Pain Diagram and Scale
  • Neck Disability Scale
  • Global Rating of Change Scale
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00128869 on Archive Site
Side Effects Questionnaire
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Mobilization and Manipulation of the Thoracic Spine in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Mobilization and Manipulation of the Thoracic Spine in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
This study aims to compare whether or not there is a difference in the effectiveness of upper back (thoracic spine) mobilizations versus manipulations used in a population of patients with mechanical neck pain. The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving a manipulative technique will experience better outcomes than patients receiving the mobilization techniques and these results will be evident at a 48-hour follow-up.
Patients with mechanical neck pain who meet the study's inclusion criteria, who do not meet the study's exclusion criteria will be offered an opportunity to participate in this study. They will be issued an informed consent detailing the study and will have time to decide whether or not to participate. Once they have enlisted in the study they will complete forms to assess their current functional level. The investigator will then perform a standard clinical exam on the upper quarter to include a comprehensive subjective examination, upper extremity strength, reflexes, sensory assessment, cervical range of motion, thoracic range of motion and pain assessment. Once the above data have been collected and the patient has met the criteria for the study, a second investigator will then choose a randomized and sealed envelope which will indicate the treatment to be performed. The patient will either receive mobilization or manipulation to the thoracic spine. Mobilizations will be performed in prone over the spinous processes of T1-T6. Each one will be performed for 30 seconds each with force directed posterioanterior. The manipulation will be performed in supine with the patient's arms crossed over his/her chest. The therapist will pull the patient's arms downward to create spinal flexion down to the level where the manipulation will occur. The therapist's manipulative hand will stabilize the lower vertebrae of the motion segment and his/her body will be used to push down through the patient's arms to perform a high velocity, low amplitude thrust of the superior vertebrae. The manipulation will first be attempted in the upper thoracic spine; if a cavitation is heard on the first attempt he/she will move onto the middle thoracic area. If a cavitation is not heard he/she will attempt a second time before moving on to the next area. Both areas will receive a maximum of two attempts. Once the manipulation or mobilization is performed the patient will be assigned one home exercise which includes rotation of the cervical spine in both directions for 10 reps, 3-4 times per day. The patient will return within 48 hours for final data collection which will include a global rating of change scale completed both by the therapist and the patient, pain diagram and scale, neck disability index, cervical and thoracic range of motion measurements, and a side effects questionnaire. The patient will then be discharged from the study and will continue with physical therapy as deemed appropriate at the time of examination.
Phase 1
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Single
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Neck Pain
  • Procedure: spine mobilizations
  • Procedure: spine manipulations
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
Same as current
October 2007
October 2007   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary complaint of neck pain with duration of symptoms greater than 4 weeks
  • Age between 18-60 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Red flags from the medical neck screening questionnaire to include tumor, fracture, metabolic disease, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoporosis, prolonged history of steroid use.
  • History of whiplash injury
  • Diagnosis of cervical spinal stenosis
  • Bilateral upper extremity symptoms
  • Evidence of central nervous system involvement to include hyperreflexia, sensory disturbances in the hand, intrinsic muscle wasting of the hands, unsteadiness during walking, nystagmus, loss of visual acuity, impaired sensation of the face, altered taste, presence of pathological reflexes
  • Two or more positive neurological signs consistent with nerve root compression to include muscle weakness involving a major muscle group of the upper extremity; diminished upper extremity muscle stretch reflex; diminished or absent sensation to pinprick in any upper extremity dermatome.
  • Prior surgery to the neck or thoracic spine
  • Pending legal action regarding neck pain
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years to 60 Years   (Adult)
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Newton-Wellesley Hospital
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Paul E Glynn, DPT, OCS Newton-Wellesley Hospital
Newton-Wellesley Hospital
May 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP