We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Mechanisms of Upper-Extremity Motor Recovery in Post-stroke Hemiparesis

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00125658
First Posted: August 1, 2005
Last Update Posted: June 23, 2017
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
VA Office of Research and Development
July 28, 2005
August 1, 2005
April 20, 2015
June 23, 2017
June 23, 2017
February 2008
June 2009   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Change in Trunk Displacement [ Time Frame: baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks ]
    Distance (in cm) of trunk lean while performing reach-to-grasp. This information is obtained from kinematics/3D motion capture and is used to inform regarding compensatory use of the trunk as compared to active motion of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand, during reach-to-grasp. Change scores are expressed relative to baseline.
  • Change in Shoulder Flexion [ Time Frame: baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks ]
    joint range of motion obtained using kinematics / motion capture. Change scores expressed relative to baseline.
  • Change in Elbow Extension Range of Motion [ Time Frame: baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks ]
    joint range of motion obtained using kinematics / motion capture. Change scores are expressed relative to baseline.
  • Upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment [ Time Frame: baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks ]
    The Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment is a standardized scale used to measure the magnitude of motor impairment (severity) following stroke. There are separate sub-scales for the upper and lower extremities. Here we used the upper-extremity component; the full range of the scale is 0 - 66 points. Higher scores approaching 66 represent better, and lower scores approaching 0 worse, motor function. There is a significant ceiling effect with the FMA, thus a score of 66 points does not mean an individual with stroke has fully recovered. Data are change scores expressed relative to baseline.
  • a) Biomechanical Power (torque x velocity) in 7 upper-extremity actions
  • b) Movement smoothness during free reaching tasks
  • c) Stretch Reflex Threshold
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00125658 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Movement Speed [ Time Frame: baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks ]
    peak velocity of movement (cm/s) during reach-to-grasp, obtained using kinematics/motion capture. Data are change scores expressed relative to baseline.
  • Movement Accuracy (Reach Path Ratio, RPR) [ Time Frame: baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks ]
    Measure is derived from kinematics/motion analysis. RPR = ratio of actual reach trajectory relative to an idealized straight line. Data are change scores, expressed relative to baseline.
  • Movement Smoothness [ Time Frame: baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks ]
    Movement smoothness is determined by assessing the number of sub movements (i.e., starts and stops) that can be identified during performance of a task. Here the task was reach-to-grasp. Sub movement are identified from kinematics/3D motion analysis. Sub-movements represent discontinuities or "jerky" movements. For example, skilled reaching is smooth and may reveal a single movement unit; in contrast, unskilled movements will reveal multiple movement units (i.e., starts and stops). As a performer practices and learns the movement, the number of sub movements is reduced. Sub movements can also present in persons with pathology. The unit of sub movements is whole numbers, or counts, of the sub movements. Data are change scores, expressed relative to baseline.
  • a) EMG activation, EMG efficiency
  • b) EMG activation patterns, clinical assessments
  • c) Task-specific H-reflex modulation
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Mechanisms of Upper-Extremity Motor Recovery in Post-stroke Hemiparesis
Mechanisms of Upper-Extremity Motor Recovery in Post-stroke Hemiparesis
The results of this study will provide sound, scientific evidence of physiologic mechanisms responsible for upper-extremity weakness; evidence of the processes involved in neuromuscular adaptation; and will elucidate the relationship between impairment and motor disability in post-stroke hemiparesis.
This proposal extends the work accomplished in our initial study (project #B2405R, 'Effects of Strength Training on Upper-limb Function in Post-stroke Hemiparesis'). In the present study we will conduct a double-blind, randomized clinical trial of staged rehabilitation for the upper-extremity involving sequential delivery of functional therapy and high intensity resistance training. Therefore, this proposal directly compares the effects of functional and resistance training delivered individually. The researchers' previous work investigated a hybrid therapy of functional and resistance training against functional training alone. All subjects will participate in a 5 week run-in period of no treatment. This no-treatment block will afford multiple baseline measurements and, in addition, will provide information regarding the rate and magnitude of any spontaneous recovery without treatment. Following the second baseline measurement, all subjects will be randomized to upper-extremity rehabilitation in either: Order A - 10 weeks of functional task practice training (FTP) followed by 10 weeks of high-intensity resistance training (Power) or Order B - resistance training (Power) followed by FTP. Re-evaluation will occur following each block of treatment,and retention effects will be evaluated after 6 and 12 months with no additional treatment. Subjects will be evaluated with: outcome measures used broadly in Clinical Neurology and Rehabilitation, a battery of biomechanical performance measures including: strength, muscle activation, reflex modulation, and motor coordination, and with kinematics of free reaching movements. The researchers will investigate persons in the intermediate phase of recovery which they define as between 6 and 18 months post-stroke , having completed all inpatient and outpatient therapies, with remaining residual motor deficits.
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Cerebrovascular Accident
  • Other: Control
    Following an initial testing session, you will complete a 5 week no training period. At the end of this period you will then participate in a 20 week therapy program - 10 weeks of Functional Task Practice (FTP) followed by 10 weeks of Power training (dynamic resistance exercise). Each 10 week block has 30 therapy sessions for a total of 60 sessions, each lasting approximately 1-1/2 hours. Follow up evaluations will be scheduled at 6 months and 12 months after completion of the entire 20 week therapy program.
    Other Name: Order A
  • Other: Experimental
    Following an initial testing session, you will complete a 5 week no training period. At the end of this period you will then participate in a 20 week therapy program - 10 weeks of Power training (dynamic resistance exercise) followed by 10 weeks of Functional Task Practice (FTP). Each 10 week block has 30 therapy sessions for a total of 60 sessions, each lasting approximately 1-1/2 hours. Follow up evaluations will be scheduled at 6 months and 12 months after completion of the entire 20 week therapy program.
    Other Name: Order B
  • Active Comparator: Control
    FTP: 30 sessions (90 minute sessions, 3 times per week, 10 weeks) followed by POWER: 30 sessions (90 minute sessions, 3 times per week, 10 weeks)
    Intervention: Other: Control
  • Experimental: Experimental
    POWER: 30 sessions (90 minute sessions, 3 times per week, 10 weeks) followed by FTP: 30 sessions (90 minute sessions, 3 times per week, 10 weeks)
    Intervention: Other: Experimental

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
14
September 2011
June 2009   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident
  • Single event
  • Unilateral hemiplegia
  • Between 6 months and 18 months post-event
  • Impairment of upper-extremity function
  • Ability to produce partial range of motion out of plane of gravity at shoulder, elbow, and wrist
  • At least 10 degrees of wrist motion (any 10 degrees), and finger flexion/extension in 2 fingers
  • Cognitive ability to follow 3-step commands

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable or uncontrolled blood pressure
  • Uncontrolled seizures
  • Flaccid hemiplegia
  • Severe cognitive impairment
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
 
NCT00125658
B3964-R
No
Not Provided
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided
VA Office of Research and Development
VA Office of Research and Development
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Carolynn Patten, PhD North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System
VA Office of Research and Development
June 2017

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP