Anthrax Vaccine Clinical Trials

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT00114621
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 16, 2005
Last Update Posted : July 2, 2017
Information provided by:
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)

June 15, 2005
June 16, 2005
July 2, 2017
September 8, 2004
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00114621 on Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Anthrax Vaccine Clinical Trials
Anthrax Vaccine Clinical Trials

This study will examine the recombinant, that is, produced by genetic engineering, protective antigen (rPA) that brings about antibodies to neutralize the anthrax toxin and that could therefore be predicted to offer protection against anthrax. Today, anthrax is rarely encountered in the United States, since the introduction of vaccines for cattle in the 1930s. A human vaccine was licensed in 1970. Vaccination against anthrax has been confined to people at risk, such as wool sorters and some veterinarians. However, the rising prospects of B. anthracis being used as a weapon have led to routine administration of the anthrax vaccine to members of the armed forces.

Adults who are in good health may be eligible for this study. The involvement of 300 adults is planned.

Participants will have a general physical exam and test for vital signs. There will also be collection of blood for chemistry and hematology; urinalysis; tests for HIV, hepatitis B and C, and liver function; and a pregnancy test, if applicable.

On a random basis, patients will receive one of the rPA formulations. Two doses of rPA will be evaluated, 10 microgram ((Micro)g) and 20 (Micro)g. This evaluation aims to establish the safety and most desirable level of dosage. Patients will receive one injection of the vaccine, administered in the left shoulder or left thigh. About 30 minutes later, their temperature will be taken, and the injection site will be inspected. Rare but severe reactions could occur if there is extreme sensitivity to a vaccine. However, such an occurrence is extremely rare following a vaccine, and if there are any dangerous symptoms, they can be effectively treated by medications available to patients while they are at the clinic. If there are no significant abnormal results, patients may return home. About 6 hours later and daily for 7 days, they will take their temperature and examine the injection site. The vaccine may cause temporary discomfort at the site of injection, and participants may experience a mild fever for 1 or 2 days after vaccination.

Patients will receive diary cards, a digital thermometer, and instructions on taking their temperature and measuring redness and swelling at the injection site, as well as for recording aches, muscle pain, or sensitivity to light for 7 days. They will be examined at the clinic at 72 hours following vaccination and also on the 7th day if they have a fever at or above 100.4 , if swelling is at or more than 2 inches, or if they request an exam. Meanwhile, a clinic staff member will call patients and discuss the findings. Then patients will receive a second and third injection of the same vaccine at 2-month intervals. There will also be interviews about patients' health at each visit to the clinic, plus monitoring of the vaccination after 6 hours and for 7 days. One year later, patients will receive a fourth injection of the same vaccine.

Direct benefit to participants in this study is not guaranteed, although an antibody response is predicted. The results in this study will help in the development of improved vaccines for anthrax.

Anthrax is rarely encountered in the U.S. since the introduction of attenuated vaccines for cattle in the 1930's. A vaccine for humans, composed of a cell-free preparation absorbed onto alum, was licensed in 1970 after successful clinical trials. Vaccination against anthrax in the U.S. was confined to individuals at risk such as wool sorters and some veterinarians until the prospects were raised of B. anthracis being used as a weapon after the Iraq war. Now anthrax vaccine is administered routinely to the armed forces. Interest in improving this vaccine was stimulated by the use of B. anthracis spores for bioterrorism.

The active component of the investigational vaccine is called the protective antigen. When B. anthracis invades the host tissues, the protective antigen activates two other proteins to form anthrax toxin. The symptoms of anthrax are caused by this toxin. Alone, the protective antigen has no known toxicity. The gene for this protein has been isolated and changed specifically to improve its properties as a vaccine-this recombinant protective antigen (rPA) elicits antibodies that neutralize the anthrax toxin and, thereby, can be predicted to confer protection.

This is the first study of our investigational rPA vaccine in humans. The broad objectives are to characterize the safety and serum antibody levels of different doses and formulations of rPA in comparison to the licensed anthrax vaccine, AVA.

Phase 1
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Drug: Anthrax Vaccine
  • Procedure: Blood Chemistry
  • Procedure: Hematology
  • Procedure: Urinalysis
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
May 25, 2011
Not Provided

Healthy 18 to 45 year-olds of either sex.


Patients receiving chronic medication, are pregnant or intend to become pregnant during the study.

Individuals who are HIV positive, have abnormal liver function, had anthrax, or received anthrax vaccine, have received or intend to receive an experimental vaccine or medication within 30 days of injection of the experimental anthrax vaccine.

Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years to 45 Years   (Adult)
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Clay W. Mash, Ph.D. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
March 16, 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP