Eccentric Muscle Training, Stimulation, and Biomarkers in SCI
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05337982 |
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : April 20, 2022
Last Update Posted : March 27, 2023
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Spinal Cord Injuries Healthy | Other: Downhill Eccentric Treadmill Training with Electrical Stimulation | Not Applicable |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 49 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Double (Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor) |
Masking Description: | Participants' primary physical therapist who will also be the outcomes assessor for clinical outcomes will be masked. Two collaborators will be masked when assessing outcomes including myelin plasticity and biomechanical outcomes. |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Eccentric Motor Training With Neuromodulation and Biomarkers for Rehabilitation Readiness in Subacute SCI |
Actual Study Start Date : | May 17, 2022 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | December 1, 2024 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | December 1, 2024 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: SCI Go
Participants with SCI randomized to the experimental group that have biomarkers that indicate low levels of inflammation will start immediately.
|
Other: Downhill Eccentric Treadmill Training with Electrical Stimulation
Participants will walk on a treadmill with a downward incline with support from a harness and assistance from trainers as needed. Participants will also simultaneously receive stimulation to their muscles including their trunk and legs. Each session will include 20 minutes of walking divided into 5 minute bouts with 5 minute rest breaks in between for 3 sessions per week for 12 weeks. |
Experimental: SCI No Go
Participants with SCI randomized to the experimental group that have biomarkers that indicate high levels of inflammation will have a delayed start of 3 months.
|
Other: Downhill Eccentric Treadmill Training with Electrical Stimulation
Participants will walk on a treadmill with a downward incline with support from a harness and assistance from trainers as needed. Participants will also simultaneously receive stimulation to their muscles including their trunk and legs. Each session will include 20 minutes of walking divided into 5 minute bouts with 5 minute rest breaks in between for 3 sessions per week for 12 weeks. |
No Intervention: SCI SOC
Participants with SCI randomized to the standard of care (SOC) group will continue with regular therapy.
|
|
No Intervention: Healthy Control
Healthy controls will provide biomarker and/or myelin (MRI) data
|
- Change from baseline in electromyography of eccentric acting muscles [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Muscle activation during weight acceptance while walking on a treadmill
- Change from baseline in kinetics during weight acceptance [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Peak magnitude of loading response as measured by the peak magnitude of power absorption during the weight acceptance phase of walking on a treadmill
- Change from baseline in kinematics during weight acceptance: hip range of motion [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Range of motion of the hip joint during walking on a treadmill
- Change from baseline in kinematics during weight acceptance: knee range of motion [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Range of motion of the knee joint during walking on a treadmill
- Change from baseline in kinematics during weight acceptance: ankle range of motion [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Range of motion of the ankle joint during walking on a treadmill
- Change from baseline in kinematics during weight acceptance: hip acceleration [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Acceleration of the hip joint during walking on a treadmill
- Change from baseline in kinematics during weight acceptance: knee acceleration [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Acceleration of the knee joint during walking on a treadmill
- Change from baseline in kinematics during weight acceptance: ankle acceleration [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Acceleration of the ankle joint during walking on a treadmill
- Change from baseline in myelination in brain and spinal cord measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Myelin spared pre and post intervention in the motor areas of the brain and cervical spinal cord compared to healthy controls
- Change from baseline in ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Classification of injury using grades A, B, C, D or E indicating level of impairment including complete (A), sensory incomplete (B), or motor incomplete (C and D). A classification differences between C and D indicates if less or more than half (respectively) of myotomes below the level of injury are able to at least move through the full range of motion against gravity. A grade of E indicates normal sensory and strength function.
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Classification of injury using grades A, B, C, D or E indicating level of impairment including complete (A), sensory incomplete (B), or motor incomplete (C and D). A classification differences between C and D indicates if less or more than half (respectively) of myotomes below the level of injury are able to at least move through the full range of motion against gravity. A grade of E indicates normal sensory and strength function.
- Change from baseline in International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI): motor scores [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]A universal classification tool for SCI based on a standardized sensory and motor assessment. The impairment scale involves both a motor and sensory examination to determine the sensory and motor levels for the right and left side, the overall neurological level of the injury and completeness of the injury i.e. whether the injury is complete or incomplete. Motor scores range from 0-50 for each the right and left sides and 50 for each the upper extremities and lower extremities. A higher score indicates better outcomes (strength).
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI): motor scores [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]A universal classification tool for SCI based on a standardized sensory and motor assessment. The impairment scale involves both a motor and sensory examination to determine the sensory and motor levels for the right and left side, the overall neurological level of the injury and completeness of the injury i.e. whether the injury is complete or incomplete. Motor scores range from 0-50 for each the right and left sides and 50 for each the upper extremities and lower extremities. A higher score indicates better outcomes (strength).
- Change from baseline in International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI): sensory scores [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]A universal classification tool for SCI based on a standardized sensory and motor assessment. The impairment scale involves both a motor and sensory examination to determine the sensory and motor levels for the right and left side, the overall neurological level of the injury and completeness of the injury i.e. whether the injury is complete or incomplete. Sensory scores range from 0-112 for each the right and left sides. A higher score indicates better outcomes (sensation).
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI): sensory scores [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]A universal classification tool for SCI based on a standardized sensory and motor assessment. The impairment scale involves both a motor and sensory examination to determine the sensory and motor levels for the right and left side, the overall neurological level of the injury and completeness of the injury i.e. whether the injury is complete or incomplete. Sensory scores range from 0-112 for each the right and left sides. A higher score indicates better outcomes (sensation).
- Change from baseline in International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI): neurological level of injury (NLI) [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]A universal classification tool for SCI based on a standardized sensory and motor assessment. The impairment scale involves both a motor and sensory examination to determine the sensory and motor levels for the right and left side, the overall neurological level of the injury and completeness of the injury i.e. whether the injury is complete or incomplete. NLI can range from the first level of the cervical spinal cord (C1) indicating tetraplegia (C1-thoracic, T1) to the final sacral level (S4-5) which would indicate paraplegia.
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI): neurological level of injury (NLI) [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]A universal classification tool for SCI based on a standardized sensory and motor assessment. The impairment scale involves both a motor and sensory examination to determine the sensory and motor levels for the right and left side, the overall neurological level of the injury and completeness of the injury i.e. whether the injury is complete or incomplete. NLI can range from the first level of the cervical spinal cord (C1) indicating tetraplegia (C1-thoracic, T1) to the final sacral level (S4-5) which would indicate paraplegia.
- Change from baseline on Autonomic Standards Assessment Form [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]International Standards to document remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI). Patient self-reported responses include normal (2) when there is no change in neurological control with respect to a specific function; reduced or altered (1) neurological control with regard to a specific function; absent (0) neurological control with regard to a specific function; and unable to assess a specific function (not testable, NT).
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks on Autonomic Standards Assessment Form [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]International Standards to document remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI). Patient self-reported responses include normal (2) when there is no change in neurological control with respect to a specific function; reduced or altered (1) neurological control with regard to a specific function; absent (0) neurological control with regard to a specific function; and unable to assess a specific function (not testable, NT).
- Change from baseline on Neuromuscular Recovery Scale (NRS) score [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Measures quality of movement without compensation. Scored in phases 1-4 with subphases A-C, with scores indicating most impairment (1A, numeric value of 1-1.99) to least impairment (4C, numeric value of 12).
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks on Neuromuscular Recovery Scale (NRS) score [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Measures quality of movement without compensation. Scored in phases 1-4 with subphases A-C, with scores indicating most impairment (1A, numeric value of 1) to least impairment (4C, numeric value of 12).
- Change from baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]The distance walked overground within 6 minutes (meters).
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]The distance walked overground within 6 minutes (meters).
- Change from baseline in 10 Meter Walk Test [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Gait speed - the time it takes to walk 10 meters (seconds)
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in 10 Meter Walk Test [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Gait speed - the time it takes to walk 10 meters (seconds)
- Change from baseline in Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM3) score [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Assessment of various activities of daily living. Scoring ranges per category: Self-care subscale, Items 1-4 (0-20); Respiration and sphincter management subscale, Items 5-8 (0-40); Mobility subscale, Items 9-17 (0-40) with higher scores indicating more independence.
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM3) score [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Assessment of various activities of daily living. Scoring ranges per category: Self-care subscale, Items 1-4 (0-20); Respiration and sphincter management subscale, Items 5-8 (0-40); Mobility subscale, Items 9-17 (0-40) with higher scores indicating more independence.
- Change from baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) scale [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Characterization of neuropathic pain symptom severity in 5 subscales (burning, pressing, paroxysmal, evoked, and paresthesia/dysesthesia. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (indicating no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Each subscale is added then divided by 100, giving a total score ranging from 0-1 with scores closest to 1 indicating worse pain.
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) scale [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Characterization of neuropathic pain symptom severity in 5 subscales (burning, pressing, paroxysmal, evoked, and paresthesia/dysesthesia. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (indicating no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Each subscale is added then divided by 100, giving a total score ranging from 0-1 with scores closest to 1 indicating worse pain.
- Change from baseline in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Subjective measure of the intensity of pain on a scale if 0-10, with a higher score indicating worse pain.
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Subjective measure of the intensity of pain on a scale if 0-10, with a higher score indicating worse pain.
- Change from baseline in Strength Testing [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Maximum voluntary eccentric knee flexion contraction after performing eccentric activity on the contralateral limb (i.e., the contralateral priming effect) measured by a Biodex.
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in Strength Testing [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Maximum voluntary eccentric knee flexion contraction after performing eccentric activity on the contralateral limb (i.e., the contralateral priming effect) measured by a Biodex.
- Change from baseline in electromyography of eccentric acting muscles at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Muscle activation during weight acceptance while walking on a treadmill
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in kinetics during weight acceptance [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Peak magnitude of loading response as measured by the peak magnitude of power absorption during the weight acceptance phase of walking on a treadmill
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in kinematics during weight acceptance: hip range of motion [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Range of motion of the hip joint during walking on a treadmill
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in kinematics during weight acceptance: knee range of motion [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Range of motion of the knee joint during walking on a treadmill
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in kinematics during weight acceptance: ankle range of motion [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Range of motion of the ankle joint during walking on a treadmill
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in kinematics during weight acceptance: hip acceleration [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Acceleration of the hip joint during walking on a treadmill
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in kinematics during weight acceptance: knee acceleration [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Acceleration of the knee joint during walking on a treadmill
- Change from 12 weeks to 16 weeks in kinematics during weight acceptance: ankle acceleration [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]Acceleration of the ankle joint during walking on a treadmill

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
SCI participants:
- Discharged from inpatient rehabilitation;
- AIS A-D at neurologic level C1-T10;
- 18-85 years old.
Healthy controls:
- Adults 18-85 years old;
- no recent major musculoskeletal injury;
- no recent surgery.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
SCI participants:
- Use of botox in the past 3 months that reduces skeletal muscle function;
- other neurologic conditions (i.e. brain injury, stroke, HIV);
- current cancer diagnosis;
- active deep vein thrombosis and anti-coagulation therapy;
- skin wounds in regions that interfere with harness,
- stimulation pads or hand placement needed for training;
- pregnancy;
- ventilator-dependence;
- cognitive conditions that preclude providing informed consent.
- Implanted medical devices that are contraindicated for electrical stimulation or MRI *(If SCI participants have conditions contraindicated for MRI they may still participate in the remainder of study activities without myelin status as an outcome measure. SCI is a rare condition therefore this is necessary in order to achieve the required sample size.)
Healthy controls:
- Implanted medical devices that are contraindicated for MRI (MRI participants only);
- neurologic conditions (i.e. brain injury, stroke, HIV);
- current cancer diagnosis;
- clotting disorders requiring anti-coagulation therapy;
- inflammatory conditions like arthritis, ulcerative colitis, lupus, etc;
- pregnancy;
- fear of needles;
- claustrophobia;
- cognitive conditions that preclude providing informed consent.

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05337982
Contact: Jeremy Beales, BS | 614 292-0754 | jeremy.beales@osumc.edu | |
Contact: Michele Basso, EdD | 614 292-0754 | michele.basso@osumc.edu |
United States, Ohio | |
The Ohio State University | Recruiting |
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210 | |
Contact: Jeremy Beales, BS 614-292-0754 jeremy.beales@osumc.edu | |
Contact: Michele Basso, EdD 614 292-0754 michele.basso@osumc.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Michele Basso, EdD | |
Canada | |
University of British Columbia | Recruiting |
Vancouver, Canada | |
Contact: Lara Boyd lara.boyd@ubc.ca |
Principal Investigator: | D. Michele Basso, EdD | Ohio State University |
Responsible Party: | Michele Basso, Professor, Ohio State University |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT05337982 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
2021H0209 GRANT13192544 ( Other Grant/Funding Number: United States Department of Defense ) |
First Posted: | April 20, 2022 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | March 27, 2023 |
Last Verified: | March 2023 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | Undecided |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
Spinal Cord Injury SCI Biomarkers MRI Locomotor Training Downhill Neuromodulation |
Electrical Stimulation CSF Rehabilitation Physical Therapy Eccentric Treadmill |
Spinal Cord Injuries Spinal Cord Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases |
Nervous System Diseases Trauma, Nervous System Wounds and Injuries |