Web-Based Body Image Intervention for Coaches of Adolescent Girls - Pilot
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05316558|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : April 7, 2022
Last Update Posted : November 2, 2022
According to the World Health Organization, only 15% of 11-17-year-old girls meet the recommended daily physical movement guidelines (e.g., 60-minutes per day). Despite extensive research highlighting the protective factors associated with sport on both mental and physical health, body image concerns are a key barrier to girls' participation in and enjoyment of sport. Sports-related environments and society more broadly further exacerbate these concerns through harmful gender stereotypes that perpetuate female objectification, discrimination, and harassment. This includes the promotion of unrealistic and sexualized appearances of female athletes, uncomfortable and objectifying uniforms, and appearance and competence-related teasing from male and female peers, as well as coaches.
To date, research has predominantly focused on athletes' perceptions of the extent to which coaches perpetuate athletes' body image concerns. However, several recent studies have been conducted exploring the perception of coaches and their role in addressing body image concerns among girls in sport. The findings of these studies indicate that although coaches are often able to identify body image concerns among their athletes, they are apprehensive to explicitly address these issues for fear of making the concerns worse. As such, systemic strategies are required within sport settings that upskill coaches as well as athletes and significant others in the athletes' environment to address body image concerns among adolescent girls in sport. At present, few such programs exist, and limited body image resources are available to coaches, despite coaches perceiving body image education as a personal and professional requirement for working with young people.
The current research will test the first online body image program for coaches. The Body Confident Coaching program was co-created with girls and coaches through an international multi-disciplinary partnership between academics, health professionals, industry, and community organizations. Multi-disciplinary partnerships can create a supportive landscape by upskilling athletes and coaches in dealing with body image concerns, which will likely lead to sustained sports participation and biopsychosocial benefits.
As such, the aim of the present study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of the Body Confident Coaching program. The program consists of five 20-minute modules that coaches complete online. Each session tackles a distinct theme related to body image in the sporting context. Outcomes will be assessed at pre- and post-intervention and include coaches' self-efficacy to tackle athletes' body image concerns (primary outcome), coaches' fat phobia and gender essentialist beliefs (secondary outcomes), and feasibility, acceptability, and adherence (process outcomes). The comparison control arm will be a waitlist control condition.
To undertake this project, coaches will be randomized into the intervention group or the control group, with 60 coaches anticipated in each arm. Those in the intervention condition will complete baseline assessments (target outcomes and demographic information), take part in the two-week intervention, and then complete the post-intervention assessments (target outcomes and feasibility and acceptability measures). Those in the waitlist control condition will complete the baseline assessments (target outcomes and demographic information) and a second assessment two weeks later (target outcomes only), after which they will get access to the online intervention. However, their engagement with the intervention will not be monitored or assessed. At completion of the post-intervention survey, all participants will receive a debrief form, outlining the study aims and objectives, and additional resources for body image and eating concerns. Lastly, to compensate participants for their time, coaches will receive an electronic voucher to the value of $25 dollars.
The investigators hypothesize that coaches who take part in the Body Confident Coaching intervention will report greater self-efficacy in identifying and tackling body image concerns among their athletes, and lower levels of fat phobia and gender essentialism at post-intervention than coaches who do not take part in the intervention.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Intervention Waitlist Control||Behavioral: Body Confident Coaching||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||97 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||Body Confident Coaching: Acceptability Testing of a Web-Based Body Image Intervention for Coaches of Adolescent Girls|
|Actual Study Start Date :||May 1, 2022|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||September 1, 2022|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||September 1, 2022|
Experimental: Body Confident Coaching
Participants in the intervention condition will take part in an online program consisting of five modules over two weeks.
Behavioral: Body Confident Coaching
The Body Confident Coaching program is a five-module online program aimed at upskilling coaches in identifying and tackling body image concerns among girls in sport. Each module will take approximately 20 minutes to complete and consists of educational content, interactive elements (quizzes, checklists, opinion polls, reflective exercises), and additional resources.
No Intervention: Waitlist control
Participants will not be explicitly told their study condition, although they will be made aware of the assessment time points and whether they receive the intervention between T1 and T2 (intervention) or after T2 (waitlist control). Following completion of post-intervention assessments (T2), the control condition will participate in the intervention; but, they will not be monitored or assessed.
- Change in coaches' self-efficacy in body image (assessed via the Coaches' Self-Efficacy in Body Image Scale) [ Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention; immediately after the intervention (2 weeks later) ]The Coaches' Self-Efficacy in Body Image Scale (CSEBIS) assesses coaches' ability to describe, recognize, support, and prevent body image concerns among their athletes. CSEBIS scores range from 0-10 with higher scores on the CSEBIS indicating higher levels of self-efficacy.
- Change in coaches' fat phobia (assessed via the Fat Phobia Scale) [ Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention; immediately after the intervention (2 weeks later) ]The Fat Phobia Scale (FPS) is a 14-item questionnaire regarding beliefs and feelings towards people who are fat or obese. FPS scores range from 1-5 with higher scores on the FPS indicating higher levels of fat phobia.
- Change in coaches' gender essentialism (assessed via the Gender Essentialism Scale) [ Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention; immediately after the intervention (2 weeks later) ]The Gender Essentialism Scale (GES) is a 25-item scale, rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), and assesses sex-role egalitarianism, support for discriminatory practices, and perceived fairness of gender-based treatment. GES scores range from 1-5 with higher scores on the GES indicating higher levels of gender essentialism.
- Total acceptability of the intervention (assessed via a self-report questionnaire) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention ]Coaches will complete feasibility and acceptability measures via a self-report questionnaire on a scale from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree) within the following domains: 1) affective attitude (e.g., I liked this program); 2) burden (e.g., it was easy to follow the content of the program); 3) ethicality (e.g., I think this program is appropriate for coaches in my sport); 4) self-efficacy (e.g., I am confident that I will use the techniques I learned from this program); 5) perceived effectiveness (e.g., the program was successful in improving my knowledge about body image); and 6) content (e.g., how easy or difficult was it to follow the program?).
- Total intervention adherence (assessed through session completion) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention ]Total intervention adherence will be assessed by the investigators as number of participants who complete the full intervention.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05316558
|Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England|
|Bristol, United Kingdom, BS16 1QY|