Don't get left behind! The modernized ClinicalTrials.gov is coming. Check it out now.
Say goodbye to ClinicalTrials.gov!
The new site is coming soon - go to the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 1 of 1 for:    pedd and radioembolization
Previous Study | Return to List | Next Study

Pressure-enabled Delivery in Radioembolization (TriNav Study) (PEDIR)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05128032
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : November 19, 2021
Last Update Posted : May 24, 2022
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
TriSalus Life Sciences
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Patrick D. Sutphin, M.D., Massachusetts General Hospital

Brief Summary:

The purpose of the study is to determine if the type of catheter used in the mapping procedure prior to radioembolization improves the delivery of radioactivity to tumor(s) in participants with liver cancer.

The name of the devices involved in this study are:

  • Pressure Enabled Drug Delivery (PEDD)/TriNav Infusion System
  • Standard 2.4F microcatheter, not otherwise specified

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Liver Cancer Hepatocellular Carcinoma Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Device: Standard microcatheter Device: PEDD device Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center, investigator-initiated study to determine if the type of catheter used to deliver the radiotracer in the mapping procedure improves the delivery of radioactive microspheres during radioembolization treatment for liver cancer.

Both catheters being used, the Pressure Enabled Drug Delivery (PEDD)/TriNav Infusion System and theStandard 2.4F microcatheter have been cleared for clinical use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Radioembolization for the treatment of liver tumors typically requires 2 separate procedures. The first procedure is called the mapping procedure. During the mapping procedure, the blood supply to the liver and tumor are evaluated with a type of x-ray called angiography. Once the optimal catheter position is determined for treatment, a "simulation" run is performed with the injection of a fluid that acts like the radiation that will be delivered to treat the tumors. This fluid is called a radiotracer. The study is looking to learn if the Pressure Enabled Drug Delivery device increases the ratio of radiotracer delivered to liver tumor tissue relative to normal liver tissue compared to a standard microcatheter. An improved delivery of radiotracer may indicate improved delivery of radioactive microspheres which may lead to improved tumor response rates and less liver toxicity

The research study procedures include assessments for eligibility, study treatment including evaluations, and follow-up visits.

Participants will undergo the study procedures in the normal course of their radioembolization procedure, with the addition of a second mapping procedure on the treatment day. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two mapping procedures: Sequence A or Sequence B.

It is expected that about 10-20 people in total will take part in this research study.

TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc., a biotechnology and medical device company, is supporting this research study by providing funding.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 20 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Official Title: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Examine The Effects of a Pressure-Enabled Drug Delivery Device on Radiotracer Distribution Compared to a Standard Microcatheter in the Context of Radioembolization
Actual Study Start Date : March 1, 2022
Estimated Primary Completion Date : January 1, 2024
Estimated Study Completion Date : June 1, 2024

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Sequence A: Standard microcatheter for Mapping #1 and PEDD device for Mapping #2.
Participants with either hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases tumors receiving standard of care radioembolization treatment will be randomly assigned to undergo a routine mapping procedure first using a standard microcatheter 2-21 days before their radioembolization treatment day. Then on day of radioembolization treatment, an extra mapping procedure using the PEDD device catheter will be done just prior to the treatment.
Device: Standard microcatheter
Small device used for mapping as part of radioembolization procedure

Device: PEDD device
Pressure enabled small device used for mapping as part of radioembolization procedure
Other Name: TriNav Infusion System catheter

Experimental: Sequence B: PEDD device for Mapping #1 and standard microcatheter for Mapping #2.
Participants with either hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases tumors receiving standard of care radioembolization treatment will be randomly assigned to undergo a routine mapping procedure first using the PEDD device catheter 2-21 days before their radioembolization treatment day. Then on day of radioembolization treatment, an extra mapping procedure using a standard microcatheter will be done just prior to the treatment.
Device: Standard microcatheter
Small device used for mapping as part of radioembolization procedure

Device: PEDD device
Pressure enabled small device used for mapping as part of radioembolization procedure
Other Name: TriNav Infusion System catheter




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Radiotracer distribution [ Time Frame: Up to 2 years ]
    The primary endpoint of the study is radiotracer distribution, as measured by tumor to normal liver (T:N) ratio. Using SPECT/CT images collected subsequent to radiotracer delivery in mapping procedures, the volumetric tumor to normal liver (T:N) ratio of 99mTc-MAA distribution will be calculated using advanced imaging processing software, such as MIM SurePlan MRT. The T:N ratio of 99mTc-MAA delivered via the standard microcatheter will be compared to the PEDD device for each patient. The T:N ratio will be calculated for each tumor as well as in aggregate for the three largest tumors as described in Section 12.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Mapping procedure comparison of Tumor to Normal (T:N) ratio between standard microcatheter and pressure-enabled delivery catheter [ Time Frame: Up to 2 years ]
    Compare the mapping procedure radiotracer T:N ratio to therapeutic microsphere T:N ratio for both the standard microcatheter and the PEDD device when both the radiotracer and therapeutic microspheres were delivered by the same catheter

  2. Technical success of radiotracer delivery as measured by ability to deliver radiotracer [ Time Frame: Up to 2 years ]
    Technical success of radiotracer delivery of each catheter, where success is defined as the satisfactory positioning and delivery of radiotracer.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Known HCC or CLM that are not amenable to curative resection or thermal ablative techniques such as microwave ablation.
  • Prior clinical decision for treatment by radioembolization.
  • Disease that is visible on CT or MRI as well as measurable disease in the liver. Measurable is defined as at least one lesion in the expected treatment field that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter) as (≥1 cm) with CT scan or MRI.
  • Age ≥18 years. Because there is limited data with respect to radioembolization in patients <18 years of age with respect to tumor dosimetry and associated adverse events participants <18 years of age, children are excluded from this study.
  • ECOG performance status < 2 (Karnofsky ≥60%, see Appendix A).
  • Life expectancy >16 weeks.
  • Suitable target artery diameter(s), defined in the TriNav labelling as 1.5 to 3.5mm vessels, based upon pre-procedural imaging.
  • Adequate organ and marrow function as defined below:

    • International Normalized Ratio (INR): ≤ 1.5
    • Hemoglobin: ≥ 8.5 g/dL
    • Leukocytes: ≥2,000/mcL
    • Absolute neutrophil count: ≥1,00/mcL
    • Platelets: ≥50,000/mcL(after transfusion, if necessary)
    • Total bilirubin: ≤2.0 mg/dL
    • Albumin: ≥3 g/dL
    • AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT): ≤6 × institutional ULN
    • Glomerular filtration rate (GFR): 30 mL/min/1.73 m2
  • Child Pugh Score A, or B7 with bilirubin ≤ 2 mg/dL.
  • If extrahepatic disease is present (e.g. brain metastases), such disease must be stable, under treatment, or not an imminent threat to the patient's life or quality of life.
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
  • Prior to study entry women of child-bearing potential must agree to not become pregnant, nurse a baby, or use any milk expressed for 2 weeks following radioembolization. Men must agree to not father a baby for 2 months after treatment with radioembolization (This is confirmed during the consenting process and documented when the patient signs the informed consent form. The effects of Yttrium-90 and radiation associated with the procedures, radiotracers, and subsequent imaging are known to have teratogenic effects on the developing human fetus. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. Because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother breastfeeding should be discontinued for the duration of study participation.)
  • For HCC patients: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage: A, B, C.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study.
  • Unresolved toxicities related to cancer therapy that the investigator will continue and compromise patient safety.
  • History of hepatic encephalopathy; history of severe peripheral allergy or intolerance to contrast agents, narcotics, sedatives, or atropine that cannot be managed medically.
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness.
  • Psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Prior external beam radiation treatment to the liver or prior intra-arterial liver-directed therapy including transarterial bland embolization, chemoembolization or radioembolization.
  • Contraindications to angiography and selective visceral catheterization, including bleeding diathesis or uncorrectable coagulopathy.
  • > 50% of tumor involvement of the liver.
  • Receipt of intervention for the Ampulla of Vater or compromise thereof.
  • Child-Pugh B8 or greater.
  • Evidence of thrombosis in the main portal vein.
  • For CLM patients: evidence of cirrhosis or portal hypertension.
  • For CLM: Clinically-evident ascites other than trace noted on imaging.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05128032


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Patrick D Sutphin, MD, PhD (617) 643-4723 psutphin@partners.org

Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Massachusetts
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Recruiting
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
Contact: Patrick D Sutphin, MD, PhD    617-643-4723    psutphin@partners.org   
Principal Investigator: Patrick D Sutphin, MD, PhD         
Sponsors and Collaborators
Massachusetts General Hospital
TriSalus Life Sciences
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Patrick D Sutphin, MD, PhD Massachusetts General Hospital
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Patrick D. Sutphin, M.D., Principal Investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05128032    
Other Study ID Numbers: 21-351
First Posted: November 19, 2021    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: May 24, 2022
Last Verified: May 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: [contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
Supporting Materials: Study Protocol
Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
Informed Consent Form (ICF)
Time Frame: Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication
Access Criteria: Contact the Partners Innovations team at http://www.partners.org/innovation

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: No
Keywords provided by Patrick D. Sutphin, M.D., Massachusetts General Hospital:
Liver Cancer
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Colorectal Neoplasms
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
Liver Neoplasms
Carcinoma
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
Neoplasms by Histologic Type
Neoplasms
Intestinal Neoplasms
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
Digestive System Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Digestive System Diseases
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Colonic Diseases
Intestinal Diseases
Rectal Diseases
Adenocarcinoma
Liver Diseases