We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Try the New Site
We're building a modernized ClinicalTrials.gov! Visit Beta.ClinicalTrials.gov to try the new functionality.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

EPIC-HR: Study of Oral PF-07321332/Ritonavir Compared With Placebo in Nonhospitalized High Risk Adults With COVID-19

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04960202
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 13, 2021
Results First Posted : February 9, 2023
Last Update Posted : February 9, 2023
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Pfizer

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to determine whether PF-07321332/ritonavir is safe and effective for the treatment of adults who are ill with COVID-19 and do not need to be in the hospital, but are at an increased risk of developing severe illness. Throughout the study period, provision will be made to allow study visits to be conducted at a participant's home or another non-clinic location if available. The total study duration is up to 24 weeks.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
COVID-19 Drug: PF-07321332 Drug: Ritonavir Drug: Placebo Phase 2 Phase 3

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 2246 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description: Eligible participants with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection will be randomized (1:1) to receive PF-07321332/ritonavir or placebo orally every 12 hours for 5 days (10 doses total).
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: AN INTERVENTIONAL EFFICACY AND SAFETY, PHASE 2/3, DOUBLE-BLIND, 2-ARM STUDY TO INVESTIGATE ORALLY ADMINISTERED PF-07321332/RITONAVIR COMPARED WITH PLACEBO IN NONHOSPITALIZED SYMPTOMATIC ADULT PARTICIPANTS WITH COVID-19 WHO ARE AT INCREASED RISK OF PROGRESSING TO SEVERE ILLNESS
Actual Study Start Date : July 16, 2021
Actual Primary Completion Date : December 9, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date : April 25, 2022


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: PF-07321332/ritonavir
Orally administered PF-07321332+ritonavir
Drug: PF-07321332
PF-07321332 (tablet)

Drug: Ritonavir
Ritonavir (capsule)

Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Orally administered placebo
Drug: Placebo
Placebo (tablet or capsule)




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Percentage of Participants With Covid-19 Related Hospitalization or Death From Any Cause Through Day 28- Modified Intent-To-Treat (mITT) Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 28 ]
    Percentage of participants with COVID-19 related hospitalization or death from any cause during the first 28 days of the study was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. Using KM method, survival probability for each time interval was calculated as the number of participants surviving divided by the number of participants at risk. Participants who had the event, dropped out, or moved out were not counted as "at risk" i.e., participants who were lost were considered "censored" and were not counted in the denominator.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [ Time Frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) up to end of safety follow-up (Day 34) ]
    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporarily associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability/ incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; a suspected transmission via a Pfizer product of an infectious agent, pathogenic or non-pathogenic and other important medical events. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs. An AE was considered as TEAE if the event started on or after start date of study intervention.

  2. Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [ Time Frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) up to end of safety follow-up (Day 34) ]
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporarily associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability/ incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; a suspected transmission via a Pfizer product of an infectious agent, pathogenic or non-pathogenic and other important medical events.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Covid-19 Related Hospitalization or Death From Any Cause Through Day 28- Modified Intent-To-Treat 1 (mITT1) Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 28 ]
    Percentage of participants with COVID-19 related hospitalization or death from any cause during the first 28 days of the study was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

  4. Time to Sustained Alleviation of All Targeted COVID-19 Signs and Symptoms Through Day 28- mITT Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Sustained alleviation of all targeted COVID-19 signs/symptoms was defined as the event occurring on the first 4 consecutive days when all symptoms scored as moderate or severe at the time of enrollment were scored as mild or absent and those scored mild or absent at the time of enrollment were scored as absent. The first day of the 4 consecutive-day period was considered date of first event. Time to sustained alleviation (event) was calculated as first event date minus first dose date plus 1, for participants with event. For participants who completed Day 28 or discontinued the study before Day 28 without sustained alleviation (censored), time was calculated as censoring date (last date on which symptom alleviation was assessed) minus first dose date plus 1 or Day 25 whichever occurred first.

  5. Time to Sustained Alleviation of All Targeted COVID-19 Signs and Symptoms Through Day 28- mITT1 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Sustained alleviation of all targeted COVID-19 signs/symptoms was defined as the event occurring on the first 4 consecutive days when all symptoms scored as moderate or severe at the time of enrollment were scored as mild or absent and those scored mild or absent at the time of enrollment were scored as absent. The first day of the 4 consecutive-day period was considered date of first event. Time to sustained alleviation (event) was calculated as first event date minus first dose date plus 1, for participants with event. For participants who completed Day 28 or discontinued the study before Day 28 without sustained alleviation (censored), time was calculated as censoring date (last date on which symptom alleviation was assessed) minus first dose date plus 1 or Day 25 whichever occurred first.

  6. Time to Sustained Alleviation of All Targeted COVID-19 Signs and Symptoms Through Day 28- Modified Intent-to-Treat 2 (mITT2) Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Sustained alleviation of all targeted COVID-19 signs/symptoms was defined as the event occurring on the first 4 consecutive days when all symptoms scored as moderate or severe at the time of enrollment were scored as mild or absent and those scored mild or absent at the time of enrollment were scored as absent. The first day of the 4 consecutive-day period was considered date of first event. Time to sustained alleviation (event) was calculated as first event date minus first dose date plus 1, for participants with event. For participants who completed Day 28 or discontinued the study before Day 28 without sustained alleviation (censored), time was calculated as censoring date (last date on which symptom alleviation was assessed) minus first dose date plus 1 or Day 25 whichever occurred first.

  7. Percentage of Participants With Severe Covid-19 Signs and Symptoms Through Day 28- mITT Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 28 ]
    Participants were required to record the severity of their Covid-19 symptoms over the past 24 hours daily on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated more severity. The scale was reported as 0= no symptoms, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe. A participant with severe score for any targeted symptoms post-baseline was counted as severe. Percentage of participants with severe Covid-19 signs and symptoms were reported.

  8. Percentage of Participants With Severe Covid-19 Signs and Symptoms Through Day 28- mITT1 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 28 ]
    Participants were required to record the severity of their Covid-19 symptoms over the past 24 hours daily on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated more severity. The scale was reported as 0= no symptoms, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe. A participant with severe score for any targeted symptoms post-baseline was counted as severe. Percentage of participants with severe Covid-19 signs and symptoms were reported.

  9. Percentage of Participants With Severe Covid-19 Signs and Symptoms Through Day 28- mITT2 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 28 ]
    Participants were required to record the severity of their Covid-19 symptoms over the past 24 hours daily on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated more severity. The scale was reported as 0= no symptoms, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe. A participant with severe score for any targeted symptoms post-baseline was counted as severe. Percentage of participants with severe Covid-19 signs and symptoms were reported.

  10. Time to Sustained Resolution of All Targeted COVID-19 Signs and Symptoms Through Day 28- mITT Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Sustained resolution was defined as when all targeted symptoms were scored as absent for 4 consecutive days. Time to sustained resolution (event) was calculated as first event date minus first dose date plus 1, for participants with event. For participants who completed Day 28 or discontinued the study before Day 28 without sustained resolution (censored), time was calculated as censoring date (last date on which symptom resolution was assessed) minus first dose date plus 1 or Day 25 whichever occurred first.

  11. Time to Sustained Resolution of All Targeted COVID-19 Signs and Symptoms Through Day 28- mITT1 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Sustained resolution was defined as when all targeted symptoms were scored as absent for 4 consecutive days. Time to sustained resolution (event) was calculated as first event date minus first dose date plus 1, for participants with event. For participants who completed Day 28 or discontinued the study before Day 28 without sustained resolution (censored), time was calculated as censoring date (last date on which symptom resolution was assessed) minus first dose date plus 1 or Day 25 whichever occurred first.

  12. Time to Sustained Resolution of All Targeted COVID-19 Signs and Symptoms Through Day 28- mITT2 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Sustained resolution was defined as when all targeted symptoms were scored as absent for 4 consecutive days. Time to sustained resolution (event) was calculated as first event date minus first dose date plus 1, for participants with event. For participants who completed Day 28 or discontinued the study before Day 28 without sustained resolution (censored), time was calculated as censoring date (last date on which symptom resolution was assessed) minus first dose date plus 1 or Day 25 whichever occurred first.

  13. Time to Sustained Alleviation of Each Targeted COVID-19 Signs and Symptoms- mITT Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Sustained alleviation of each targeted COVID-19 signs/symptoms was defined as the event occurring on the first 4 consecutive days when each symptom scored as moderate or severe at the time of enrollment were scored as mild or absent and those scored mild or absent at the time of enrollment were scored as absent. The first day of the 4 consecutive-day period was considered date of first event. Time to sustained alleviation (event) was calculated as first event date minus first dose date plus 1, for participants with event. For participants who completed Day 28 or discontinued the study before Day 28 without sustained alleviation (censored), time was calculated as censoring date (last date on which symptom alleviation was assessed) minus first dose date plus 1 or Day 25 whichever occurred first.

  14. Time to Sustained Alleviation of Each Targeted COVID-19 Signs and Symptoms- mITT1 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Sustained alleviation of each targeted COVID-19 signs/symptoms was defined as the event occurring on the first 4 consecutive days when each symptom scored as moderate or severe at the time of enrollment were scored as mild or absent and those scored mild or absent at the time of enrollment were scored as absent. The first day of the 4 consecutive-day period was considered date of first event. Time to sustained alleviation (event) was calculated as first event date minus first dose date plus 1, for participants with event. For participants who completed Day 28 or discontinued the study before Day 28 without sustained alleviation (censored), time was calculated as censoring date (last date on which symptom alleviation was assessed) minus first dose date plus 1 or Day 25 whichever occurred first.

  15. Time to Sustained Alleviation of Each Targeted COVID-19 Signs and Symptoms- mITT2 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Sustained alleviation of each targeted COVID-19 signs/symptoms was defined as the event occurring on the first 4 consecutive days when each symptom scored as moderate or severe at the time of enrollment were scored as mild or absent and those scored mild or absent at the time of enrollment were scored as absent. The first day of the 4 consecutive-day period was considered date of first event. Time to sustained alleviation (event) was calculated as first event date minus first dose date plus 1, for participants with event. For participants who completed Day 28 or discontinued the study before Day 28 without sustained alleviation (censored), time was calculated as censoring date (last date on which symptom alleviation was assessed) minus first dose date plus 1 or Day 25 whichever occurred first.

  16. Time to Sustained Resolution of Each Targeted COVID-19 Signs and Symptoms- mITT Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Sustained resolution was defined as when each targeted symptom was scored as absent for 4 consecutive days. Time to sustained resolution (event) was calculated as first event date minus first dose date plus 1, for participants with event. For participants who completed Day 28 or discontinued the study before Day 28 without sustained resolution (censored), time was calculated as censoring date (last date on which symptom resolution was assessed) minus first dose date plus 1 or Day 25 whichever occurred first.

  17. Time to Sustained Resolution of Each Targeted COVID-19 Signs and Symptoms- mITT1 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Sustained resolution was defined as when each targeted symptom was scored as absent for 4 consecutive days. Time to sustained resolution (event) was calculated as first event date minus first dose date plus 1, for participants with event. For participants who completed Day 28 or discontinued the study before Day 28 without sustained resolution (censored), time was calculated as censoring date (last date on which symptom resolution was assessed) minus first dose date plus 1 or Day 25 whichever occurred first.

  18. Time to Sustained Resolution of Each Targeted COVID-19 Signs and Symptoms- mITT2 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Sustained resolution was defined as when each targeted symptom was scored as absent for 4 consecutive days. Time to sustained resolution (event) was calculated as first event date minus first dose date plus 1, for participants with event. For participants who completed Day 28 or discontinued the study before Day 28 without sustained resolution (censored), time was calculated as censoring date (last date on which symptom resolution was assessed) minus first dose date plus 1 or Day 25 whichever occurred first.

  19. Number of Participants With Progression to a Worsening Status in 1 or More Self-reported COVID-19 Associated Symptoms Through Day 28-mITT Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Participants were required to record the severity of their Covid-19 symptoms over the past 24 hours daily on a 4-point scale where 0 = no symptoms; 1= mild; 2= moderate; and 3= severe. Vomiting and diarrhea were each rated on a 4-point frequency scale where 0= no occurrence, 1= mild for 1 to 2 times, 2= moderate for 3 to 4 times, and 3= severe for 5 or greater. Progression to a worsening status for any targeted symptom was based up on increasing severity (i.e. the first time any targeted symptoms worsened after treatment relative to baseline).

  20. Number of Participants With Progression to a Worsening Status in 1 or More Self-reported COVID-19 Associated Symptoms Through Day 28-mITT1 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Participants were required to record the severity of their Covid-19 symptoms over the past 24 hours daily on a 4-point scale where 0 = no symptoms; 1= mild; 2= moderate; and 3= severe. Vomiting and diarrhea were each rated on a 4-point frequency scale where 0= no occurrence, 1= mild for 1 to 2 times, 2= moderate for 3 to 4 times, and 3= severe for 5 or greater. Progression to a worsening status for any targeted symptom was based up on increasing severity (i.e. the first time any targeted symptoms worsened after treatment relative to baseline).

  21. Number of Participants With Progression to a Worsening Status in 1 or More Self-reported COVID-19 Associated Symptoms Through Day 28-mITT2 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 28 ]
    Participants were required to record the severity of their Covid-19 symptoms over the past 24 hours daily on a 4-point scale where 0 = no symptoms; 1= mild; 2= moderate; and 3= severe. Vomiting and diarrhea were each rated on a 4-point frequency scale where 0= no occurrence, 1= mild for 1 to 2 times, 2= moderate for 3 to 4 times, and 3= severe for 5 or greater. Progression to a worsening status for any targeted symptom was based up on increasing severity (i.e. the first time any targeted symptoms worsened after treatment relative to baseline).

  22. Percentage of Participants With a Resting Peripheral Oxygen Saturation >=95% at Days 1 and 5- mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 1, 5 ]
    In this outcome measure, the percentage of participants with a resting peripheral oxygen saturation >=95% were reported.

  23. Percentage of Participants With a Resting Peripheral Oxygen Saturation >=95% at Days 1 and 5- mITT1 Population [ Time Frame: Day 1, 5 ]
    In this outcome measure, the percentage of participants with a resting peripheral oxygen saturation >=95% were reported.

  24. Percentage of Participants With a Resting Peripheral Oxygen Saturation >=95% at Days 1 and 5- mITT2 Population [ Time Frame: Day 1, 5 ]
    In this outcome measure, the percentage of participants with a resting peripheral oxygen saturation >=95% were reported.

  25. Percentage of Participants Who Died Through Week 24- mITT Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Week 24 ]
    In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with death due to any cause was presented.

  26. Percentage of Participants Who Died Through Week 24- mITT1 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Week 24 ]
    In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with death due to any cause was presented.

  27. Percentage of Participants Who Died Through Week 24- mITT2 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Week 24 ]
    In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with death due to any cause was presented.

  28. Plasma Concentration Versus Time Summary of PF-07321332 [ Time Frame: 1 Hour post-dose on Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 5 ]
  29. Change From Baseline in Logarithm to Base10 (Log10) Transformed Viral Load at Day 3, 5, 10 and 14- mITT Population [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 3, 5, 10 and 14 ]
    The viral load was measured in nasal or nasopharyngeal samples using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

  30. Change From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Viral Load at Day 3, 5, 10 and 14- mITT1 Population [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 3, 5, 10 and 14 ]
    The viral load was measured in nasal or nasopharyngeal samples using RT-PCR.

  31. Change From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Viral Load at Day 3, 5, 10 and 14- mITT2 Population [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 3, 5, 10 and 14 ]
    The viral load was measured in nasal or nasopharyngeal samples using RT-PCR.

  32. Number of COVID-19 Related Medical Visits- mITT Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Day 34 ]
    Medical visits included emergency room, practitioner's office, home healthcare services, urgent care, telephone consultation, outpatient infusion center, other, COVID-19-related-hospitalization (intensive care unit [ICU] and non-ICU stays). In this outcome measure, COVID-19-related medical visits of participants were reported.

  33. Number of COVID-19 Related Medical Visits- mITT1 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Day 34 ]
    Medical visits included emergency room, practitioner's office, home healthcare services, urgent care, telephone consultation, outpatient infusion center, other, COVID-19-related-hospitalization (ICU and non-ICU stays). In this outcome measure, COVID-19-related medical visits of participants were reported.

  34. Number of COVID-19 Related Medical Visits- mITT2 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Day 34 ]
    Medical visits included emergency room, practitioner's office, home healthcare services, urgent care, telephone consultation, outpatient infusion center, other, COVID-19-related-hospitalization (ICU and non-ICU stays). In this outcome measure, COVID-19-related medical visits of participants were reported.

  35. Number of Days in Hospital and ICU for the Treatment of COVID-19- mITT Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Day 34 ]
  36. Number of Days in Hospital and ICU for the Treatment of COVID-19- mITT1 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Day 34 ]
  37. Number of Days in Hospital and ICU for the Treatment of COVID-19- mITT2 Population [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Day 34 ]


Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 5 days prior to randomization
  • Initial onset of COVID-19 signs/symptoms within 5 days prior to the day of randomization and at least 1 of the specified COVID-19 signs/symptoms present on the day of randomization
  • Fertile participants must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception
  • Has at least 1 characteristic or underlying medical condition associated with an increased risk of developing severe illness from COVID-19

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of or need for hospitalization for the medical treatment of COVID-19
  • Prior to current disease episode, any confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection
  • Known medical history of active liver disease
  • Receiving dialysis or have known moderate to severe renal impairment
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection with a viral load greater than 400 copies/mL or taking prohibited medications for HIV treatment
  • Suspected or confirmed concurrent active systemic infection other than COVID-19
  • History of hypersensitivity or other contraindication to any of the components of the study intervention
  • Current or expected use of any medications or substances that are highly dependent on CYP3A4 for clearance or are strong inducers of CYP3A4
  • Has received or is expected to receive convalescent COVID-19 plasma
  • Has received or is expected to receive any dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine before the Day 34 visit
  • Participating in another interventional clinical study with an investigational compound or device, including those for COVID-19 through the long-term follow-up visit
  • Known prior participation in this trial or other trial involving PF-07321332
  • Oxygen saturation of <92% on room air, or on their standard home oxygen supplementation for those who regularly receive chronic supplementary oxygen for an underlying lung condition
  • Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04960202


Locations
Show Show 201 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Pfizer
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center Pfizer
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by Pfizer:
Study Protocol  [PDF] November 20, 2021
Statistical Analysis Plan  [PDF] April 28, 2022

Additional Information:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Pfizer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04960202    
Other Study ID Numbers: C4671005
2021-002895-38 ( EudraCT Number )
EPIC-HR ( Other Identifier: Alias Study Number )
First Posted: July 13, 2021    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: February 9, 2023
Last Update Posted: February 9, 2023
Last Verified: January 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
URL: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Pfizer:
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Ritonavir
COVID-19
Pneumonia, Viral
Pneumonia
Respiratory Tract Infections
Infections
Virus Diseases
Coronavirus Infections
Coronaviridae Infections
Nidovirales Infections
RNA Virus Infections
Lung Diseases
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Nirmatrelvir
HIV Protease Inhibitors
Viral Protease Inhibitors
Protease Inhibitors
Enzyme Inhibitors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Anti-HIV Agents
Anti-Retroviral Agents
Antiviral Agents
Anti-Infective Agents
Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors
Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors