Integrated Patient Care Intradialysis Programme in Hemodialysis Through a Virtual Health Platform (GoodRENal)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04823286 |
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : March 30, 2021
Last Update Posted : February 13, 2023
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
There is wide evidence regarding the weak points of end-stage Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in hemodialysis, and they include three intervention aspects: exercise, nutrition and psychological support. Evidence shows that exercise for patients in hemodialysis results in increased survival rate, functional capacity, strength and health-related quality of life.
Additionally, different studies have shown the benefits of psychological interventions and the positive effect of educational programs on nutritional care for patients in hemodialysis.
Despite the well-known benefits of exercise, this kind of programs are not being implemented in the routine clinical care of hemodialysis patients.
Thus, the GoodRENal project aims to promote healthy lifestyles among dialysis patients in a holistic approach that combines exercise, nutrition and psychological wellbeing plus cognitive functioning addressing adult learners. The project will, in phase 1, explore barriers and facilitators of patients, carers and health professionals towards healthy lifestyle (physical activity, nutrition and psychological well being). In phase 2, the project will develop a health virtual platform including these three dimensions of cares. In summary, the project outputs will be:
- A didactic content in a modular platform to create an educational program for integrated treatments in patients with dialysis
- A guideline to promote healthy lifestyles among dialysis patients for health care providers
- A guideline to promote e healthy lifestyles among dialysis patients for patients and formal - nonformal carers
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
End Stage Renal Disease Hemodialysis-Induced Symptom Chronic Kidney Diseases | Other: Virtual reality health platform during hemodialysis | Not Applicable |

Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 108 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Intervention Model Description: | Participants will be randomized into one of two groups, intradialysis virtual reality platform or usual care |
Masking: | Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) |
Masking Description: | A team of assessors, different to the researchers implementing the exercise, will record all dependent variables. A blind researcher will randomize participants |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | REVID +: Integrated Patient Care Intradialysis Programme in Hemodialysis Through a Virtual Health Platform (GoodRENal.eu) |
Actual Study Start Date : | March 31, 2021 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | July 31, 2023 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | August 31, 2023 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Virtual reality health platform during hemodialysis
During 12 weeks subjects will use a VR platform during hemodialysis. The intervention will be virtual reality exercise, nutritional advice and psychological wellbeing support plus cognitive training.
|
Other: Virtual reality health platform during hemodialysis
Subjects will play a virtual reality game specially adapted for subjects undertaking hemodialysis. The game will also aim at providing nutritional advice, and improving psychological wellbeing and cognitive function. |
No Intervention: Control group-usual care
During 12 weeks subjects will carry on with the usual care in the hemodialysis unit
|
- Change from baseline distance walked assessed by the 6 minutes walk test at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]More meters walked in 6 minutes mean a better walking capacity
- Change from baseline health-related quality of life assessed by the Short Form 36 questionnaire at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]The short form 36 gives data on 8 subscales and 2 components, higher score mean better health-related quality of life The scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating optimal health and 0 reflecting very poor health.
- Change from baseline stance from a chair capacity assessed by the sit to stand 10 at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]Time in seconds to perform 10 sit to stand repetitions. A decrease in the time to perform the test means better functional capacity to stand up from a chair
- Change from baseline usual gait speed assessed by a 4 meters gait speed test at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]Speed in m/s to cover 4 meters at normal speed. An increase in speed to perform the test means better gait speed
- Change from baseline handgrip strength assessed by a handgrip dinamometer at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]Bilateral handgrip strength measured in kilograms. An increase in handgrip strength means better strength
- Change from baseline lower limbs strength assessed by a dinamometer at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]Bilateral lower limbs muscle strength measured in kilograms. An increase in strength means better strength
- Change from baseline physical activity level assessed by the human activity profile questionnaire, average activity score at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]The average activity score of the human activity profile questionnaire ranges from 0 to 94. . A higher score means a higher physical activity level
- Change from baseline physical activity level assessed by the international physical activity questionnaire at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]The score of the international physical activity questionnaire will be recorded in MET-minutes/week. A higher score means a higher physical activity level
- Percentage of sessions performed from te sessions offered to measure adherence to the educational program [ Time Frame: After 12 weeks of intervention ]Calculation will be the result of sessions performed/sessions offered
- Healthcare resources expenditure and costs [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]Total amount in euros spent on external consultations, laboratory tests, radiology tests, hospital pharmacy, emergency department healthcare provision, and hospitalisation.
- Change from baseline lean body mass assessed by the bioimpedance spectroscopy at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]Lean body mass is a surrogate of muscle mass in kilograms. Increase in lean body mass means increase in muscle mass
- Change from baseline qualitative assessment in food intake assessed by the Short form food questionnaire at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]Qualitative assessment of food intake Short form food questionnaire. Improvement in the dietary quality
- Change from baseline nutritional status assessed by the 7 point Subjective Global Assessment at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]7 point subjective global assessment scores from 1 to 7, the higher the score the better nutritional status
- Change from baseline cognitive function assessed by the Mini-mental State at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]The maximum MMSE score is 30 points. A score of 20 to 24 suggests mild dementia, 13 to 20 suggests moderate dementia, and less than 12 indicates severe dementia.
- Change from baseline Anxiety assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]Scores obtained between 0 and 21. The higher the score obtained, the higher the level of anxiety and depression.
- Change from baseline positive and negative emotions assessed by Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scale (PANAS) at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]It includes 2 subscales (positive affect and negative affect) with 10 items each. Each subscale can contain scores between 10 and 50. The higher the score obtained, the greater the presence of a particular affect.
- Change from baseline depression assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]The scores range from 0 to 63 points. The higher the score, the greater the severity of depressive symptoms. Four groups are established according to the total score: 0-13, minimal depression; 14-19, mild depression; 20-28, moderate depression; and 29-63, severe depression.
- Change from baseline anxiety assessed by the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]Scale composed of 2 subscales. The range of scores for both subscales is between 0 and 60 points so that higher scores reflect greater anxiety.
- Change from baseline perceived stress assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]Scores obtained in a range of 0 to 56 points. The higher the score obtained, the higher the level of perceived stress.
- Change from baseline cognitive state assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]Scores on the MoCA assessment range from 0 to 30. A score of 26 and above is considered normal.
- Change from baseline attention level assessed by the Trail Making Test (TMT) at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]Scoring is based on time taken to complete the test, with lower scores being better.
- Change from baseline memory assessed by the Wechsler-IV Memory Scale at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, 12 weeks follow-up after the end of the intervention ]The correction system allows obtaining scalar scores, indices, centiles and confidence intervals, in order to achieve a more flexible interpretation. It is interpreted on the basis of scales. The Spanish scales have been elaborated from a sample of almost 900 subjects aged between16 and 90 years.

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 99 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients on hemodialysis medically stable
- Ability to walk to walk at least a few steps, even if walking aids like canes or a walker ar needed
- Life expectancy greater than 6 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Myocardial infarction in the previous 6 weeks
- Angina unstable on exercise or at rest
- Brain injury derived from a cardiovascular problem. Cerebral vascular disease such as stroke in the last 6 months or with relevant sequelae in lower limb mobility presenting hemiparesia.
- Life expectancy less than 6 months
- Cognitive impairment
- Language barriers
- Illiteracy

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04823286
Contact: Eva SEGURA-ORTÍ, PhD | 00 34 671580094 | eva.segura@gmail.com |
Belgium | |
KU Leuven | Not yet recruiting |
Leuven, Belgium, 3000 | |
Contact: Amaryllis H Van Craenenbroeck, PhD Amaryllis.vancraenenbroeck@kuleuven.be | |
Greece | |
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki | Recruiting |
Thessaloníki, Greece, 57001 | |
Contact: Evangelia Kouidi, PhD kouidi@phed.auth.gr | |
Spain | |
Hospital de Manises | Recruiting |
Manises, Valencia, Spain, 46940 | |
Contact: Eva SEGURA-ORTÍ, PhD 00 34 671580094 eva.segura@gmail.com | |
Universitat de Valencia | Enrolling by invitation |
Valencia, Spain, 46010 | |
Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia | Enrolling by invitation |
Valencia, Spain, 46022 | |
Sweden | |
Skane Univeristy Hospital | Not yet recruiting |
Lund, Sweden | |
Contact: Naomi Clyne, PhD Naomi.Clyne@med.lu.se | |
Karolinska Institute | Enrolling by invitation |
Stockholm, Sweden, 14186 |
Principal Investigator: | Eva SEGURA-ORTÍ | Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera, UCH CEU |
Responsible Party: | Eva Segura Ortí, Professor, Cardenal Herrera University |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT04823286 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
2020-064-1 |
First Posted: | March 30, 2021 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | February 13, 2023 |
Last Verified: | February 2023 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
exercise physical function health related quality of life nutrition psychological wellbeing |
Kidney Diseases Renal Insufficiency, Chronic Kidney Failure, Chronic Urologic Diseases Female Urogenital Diseases Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
Urogenital Diseases Male Urogenital Diseases Renal Insufficiency Chronic Disease Disease Attributes Pathologic Processes |