We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Try the New Site
We're building a modernized ClinicalTrials.gov! Visit Beta.ClinicalTrials.gov to try the new functionality.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 2 of 6 for:    mainstay restore

ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Evaluation (RESTORE)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04803214
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : March 17, 2021
Last Update Posted : May 6, 2023
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Mainstay Medical

Brief Summary:
This study is a prospective, randomized study comparing ReActiv8 Therapy to Optimal Medical Management (OMM).

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Chronic Low-back Pain Device: ReActiv8 Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 230 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Evaluation
Actual Study Start Date : July 14, 2021
Estimated Primary Completion Date : July 2025
Estimated Study Completion Date : July 2025

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Back Pain

Arm Intervention/treatment
Treatment (ReActiv8)
Market-approved ReActiv8 device
Device: ReActiv8
Market-approved ReActiv8 device implanted

No Intervention: Control (OMM)
Standard of Care



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
    Comparison of 1-year change from baseline in ODI between Treatment and Control. ODI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100 where a higher score is a better outcome.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in Low Back Pain Numerical Rating Scale (LBP NRS) [ Time Frame: 1 year ]

    Comparison of 1-year change from baseline in LBP NRS between Treatment and Control.

    NRS is measured on a scale of 0 to 10 where a higher score is a better outcome.


  2. Change in EQ-5D [ Time Frame: 1 year ]

    Comparison of 1-year change from baseline in EQ-5D between Treatment and Control.

    EQ-5D is measured on a scale of -0.5 to 1.0 where a higher score is a better outcome.




Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   21 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥21 years
  2. Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle dysfunction
  3. Intractable Chronic Low Back Pain that has persisted >6 months resulting in pain most of the days in the past 12 months
  4. Failed therapy including pain medications and physical therapy
  5. Not a candidate for spine surgery
  6. Low Back Pain NRS of ≥6 and ≤9
  7. Oswestry Disability Index score ≥30 and ≤60
  8. Willing and capable of giving Informed Consent
  9. Able to comply with this protocol
  10. On Optimal Medical Management per the Investigator

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindicated for the ReActiv8 System
  2. BMI > 35
  3. Any surgical correction procedure for scoliosis at any time, or a current clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe scoliosis
  4. An independent MRI assessment identifying a pathology that is likely the cause of the CLBP and is amenable to surgery
  5. Leg pain described as being worse than back pain, or radiculopathy (neuropathic pain) below the knee
  6. Any condition unrelated to CLBP which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could limit physical movement or compliance with the protocol, or interfere with the assessment of efficacy
  7. Surgical and other procedure exclusions
  8. Psycho-social exclusions
  9. Protocol compliance exclusions
  10. General exclusions

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04803214


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Diane Burnside 763-270-5303 diane.burnside@mainstay-medical.com

Locations
Show Show 28 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Mainstay Medical
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Chair: Frank Schwab New York-Presbyterian
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Mainstay Medical
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04803214    
Other Study ID Numbers: 980012
First Posted: March 17, 2021    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: May 6, 2023
Last Verified: May 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: No
Keywords provided by Mainstay Medical:
Neurostimulation
Stimulation
Multifidus
Restorative neurostimulation
Multifidus muscle control
Neurostimulator
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Low Back Pain
Back Pain
Pain
Neurologic Manifestations