Wilderness Program for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors (WAYA)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04761042|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : February 18, 2021
Last Update Posted : February 18, 2021
Young cancer survivors are at higher risk of cancer reoccurrence, frailty, suicidal ideation, sedentary behaviour, reduced quality of life, and reduced overall life expectancy, compared to their siblings or healthy young persons. Development of new interventions after cancer treatment is urgently needed in order to reduce and diminish these unwanted risks in young cancer survivors. Previous studies have reported that wilderness therapy may reduce anxiety/depression, improve body image and self-efficacy, and increase physical activity in young adult cancer survivors.
High quality randomized controlled studies are lacking and thereby urgently needed to investigate the impact of wilderness programs on mental and physical health of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. The primary aim of this study is to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) on a wilderness program versus an attention-control activity in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. We will examine the feasibility of performing a RCT and examine health outcomes, in preparation for a larger RCT with adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.
A total of 40 adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (aged 16-30) will be randomized to a wilderness intervention or an attention-control group. The wilderness intervention is a one-week outdoor program where participants have individualized and group activities such as climbing, hiking, kayaking, bush crafting and mindfulness. After this week, participants continue a 3-month program to incorporate elements of the intervention into their daily life. The control group will join a relaxing one-week holiday at a Wellness Center and will be followed for 3 months to control for attention. Study outcomes will be recruitment speed, willingness to be randomized, study adherence, self-reported mental health using validated scales, and tests of physical activity and health (six-minute walk test, submaximal oxygen uptake, blood pressure, sedentary behaviour and physical activity). Outcomes are measured at the start of the study, 1 week and 3 months after intervention. One year follow up of self-reported outcomes will be online. Findings of the study will provide important insights into the feasibility of a large study as well as on ways by which wilderness therapy can promote health in young cancer survivors.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Cancer||Other: WAYA-Wilderness Other: WAYA-Holiday||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||40 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||A Randomized control design where participants are randomized to one of the two groups, stratification is made for gender and age (older/younger).|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
After being screened for recruitment by the primary investigator, participant are randomized into the two group. Randomization is made by a second team member that up till then had no contact with participants or knows their names (based on screening numbers).
After being notified of groups assignment the primary investigator again contacts participants to enter the into the study and give information on group assignment.
Outcome data will be entered confidential, and the outcomes assessor will be blinded regarding group assignment and identification of participants.
|Official Title:||A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study Assessing Feasibility and Impact of a Wilderness Program on Mental and Physical Health of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors|
|Actual Study Start Date :||January 1, 2021|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||October 30, 2023|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 31, 2023|
Experimental: Wilderness program
A one-week (8 days) wilderness program, 3-month online support, and a follow-up visit for four days.
The wilderness intervention includes challenging tasks in order to help participants' overcome and master new physical and psychological challenges in an unknown environment, with the idea to support self-efficacy, self-esteem, and ability to recover from adversity. The program is designed to encourage participants to connect with nature as to experience gratitude for the richness of the natural world, a sense of calmness and trust upon spending time in nature, and to be more physically active in nature.
Elements previously described Participants will continue in a three-month program at home (on-line supported) after the initial 8-days in order to empower participants to incorporate elements of the onsite wilderness program into their daily life. An individualized a plan for activities will be developed together with the participant.
After three months, there will be a re-visit with follow up on outcome measures and reconnection.
Holiday program (Attention control)
A one-week (8 days) holiday program, 3-month online contact, and a follow-up visit for four days.
An attention control group (information in "Detailed description")
- Feasibility - Participant Preferences [ Time Frame: At prestudy screening - prior to inclusion ]Participant Preferences (P-Pref) regarding intervention arms (no pref, slight pref, strong preference)
- Feasibility - Participant expectations [ Time Frame: At prestudy screening - prior to inclusion ]A textual description of what participants would expect to experience from participation in either intervention group.
- Feasibility - Participant willingness to be randomized [ Time Frame: At prestudy screening - prior to inclusion ]Willingness of participants to be randomized (Yes/No)
- Feasibility - Time to recruitment [ Time Frame: Until predetermined number of participants are reached or max up till 18 months ]A planned n of 40 is planned and documentation of time to reach the goal will be made until predetermined number of participants are reached or max up till 18 months
- Feasibility - Participant Adherence to Protocol [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 1/2 year ]Adherence of the participants to the study protocol. A textual description of participant adherence based on observation and interviews documented in the participants study protocol
- Feasibility - Logistics and Burden [ Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 1/2 year ]Logistics and Burden (for participants) to perform physical performance/fitness tests. A textual description of participant Log-BurdenPhysbased on observation and interviews documented in the participants study protocol
- Feasibility - Logistics and willingness to complete all planned study-related questionnaires [ Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 1/2 year ]Logistics and willingness to complete all planned study-related questionnaires. A textual description of participant Log-WillQuest based on observation and interviews documented in the participants study protocol
- Feasibility - Adherence to three month at home program [ Time Frame: up to three months ]The adherence of the participants to the three months at home program and transference of activities in this period. A textual description of participant adherence based on observation and interviews documented in the participants study protocol
- Feasibility - Occurrence of adverse events [ Time Frame: up to three months ]
Occurrence of adverse events during program execution. A textual description of occurence of AdvEvents based on observation and interviews documented in the participants study protocol.
Adverse events will be coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and analysed using preferred terms and allocation to system organ class. Safety of the interventions will be measured by analyzing number and type of adverse events reported.
- Minneapolis Manchester Quality of Life - MMQL [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, and 12 month follow up ]
Minneapolis Manchester Quality of Life instrument - MMQL, at baseline prior to intervention, prior to 3 month follow up, and after one year.
The MMQL-Adolescent form is a quality of life questionnaire specifically designed for young cancer survivors (age 13-20 years old) and consists of seven quality of life domains; physical, cognitive, psychological and social functioning, body image, intimate relations, and outlook on life. Scoring on the MMQL ranges from 1 to 5; 5 indicates maximal HRQL. An overall quality-of-life (QOL) score is also computed. Includes 45 items, total sum ranging between 45 and 225 The instruments has good psychometric characteristics and is translated and validated in the Swedish context.
- International Physical Activity Questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, and 12 month follow up ]
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), at baseline prior to intervention, prior to 3 month follow up, and after one year.
Subjective reporting of time spent on performing different levels of physical activity, reported in days, hours, and minutes.
An instrument evaluated as having good psychometric properties, and also translated into Swedish language:
- Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, and 12 month follow up ]
Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), data collected at baseline prior to intervention, prior to 3 month follow up, and after one year.
The GSE scale consists of 10 items rated on a four-point (1-4) Likert scale (''not at all true'' to ''exactly true''). Means are calculated as the sum of all answers divided by ten (the total number of items).
An instrument evaluated as having good/acceptable psychometric properties, and also translated into Swedish language:
- Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale RSES [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, and 12 month follow up ]
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) at baseline prior to intervention, prior to 3 month follow up, and after one year The scale has four-graded (1-4) Likert-type responses where a rating of one represents the worst and four the best self-esteem. Minimal score10 maximum 40.
An instrument evaluated as having good psychometric properties, and also translated into Swedish language.
- Nature Relatedness Scale [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month, and 12 month follow up ]
Nature Relatedness Scale (NRS), at baseline prior to intervention, prior to 3 month follow up, and after one year The scale has 21 items that have five-graded (1-5) Likert-type responses where a rating of one represents the least agreement with item statement and five full agreement. An overall NRS score is calculated where means are calculated as the sum of all answers divided by 21 (the total number of items). The scale also has three subscale that can be extracted and calculated in the same way as the total sum.
An instrument evaluated as having good psychometric properties in English. Previously not used in Swedish language but now translated and re-translated by the research group and the scale is presently undergoing psychometric testing.
- Physical performance - Six Minute Walking Test [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month ]
Six Minute Walking Test - Will be collected during the first day of the 8 day program, and the first day of three month follow up.
A frequently used test where participant walks on a standardized path, trail, track for six minutes, and the outcome is expressed in number of meters walked.
- Physical performance -Oxygen uptake [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month ]
Oxygen uptake - The Ekholm-Bak submaximal test for oxygen (VO2max) uptake will be collected during the first day of the 8 day program, and the first day of three month follow up.
Outcome- VO2max comprises and is expressed as: L/min, ml/kg/min, but is calculated by combining measures of Maximal heartrate (HRmax) - beats/min, and perceived exertion (Borg Scale 6-20, where a 6 represents a very light exertion and 20 an extremely (too hard) exertion.
The Ekholm-Bak test is submaximal cycle ergometer aerobic fitness test evaluated as being valid, reliable and safe to use in vulnerable populations.
- Heart Rate [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month ]Heart rate - Resting heart rate (Beat/min) will be recorded during the first day of the 8 day program, and the first day of three month follow up
- Blood Pressure [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month ]BP - Resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) will be recorded during the first day of the 8 day program, and the first day of three month follow up
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04761042
|Contact: Sture Espwall||+4610142 79 email@example.com|
|Contact: Mats Jong, PhDfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Mid Sweden University, department of Health Sciences||Recruiting|
|Sundsvall, Sweden, 85170|
|Contact: Sture Espwall +461014279 93 email@example.com|
|Contact: Mats Jong, PhD +46101428966 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator: Mats Jong, PhD|
|Sub-Investigator: Miek Jong, PhD|
|Principal Investigator:||Mats Jong, PhD||Dep of Health Sciences/Public Health, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden|