Technological-assisted Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Subjects With Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (T-ARSCI)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04760470 |
Recruitment Status :
Enrolling by invitation
First Posted : February 18, 2021
Last Update Posted : November 9, 2022
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Spinal Cord Injuries | Other: Technological-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation | Not Applicable |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 60 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Crossover Assignment |
Masking: | Single (Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Technological-assisted Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Subjects With Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury - Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial |
Actual Study Start Date : | April 12, 2021 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | May 2023 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | May 2023 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Technological-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation
Technological-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation.
|
Other: Technological-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation
Subjects get 6 weeks of technological-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation |
No Intervention: Wait list control
Continue their normal lives.
|
- Mean change of The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores between baseline, after 6 weeks and 6 months (follow-up) [ Time Frame: baseline, after 6 weeks and 6 months (follow-up) ]Maximum score is 114 (on a scale from 0 to 114) as the higher score indicate better upper extremity functioning.
- Mean change of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) scores between baseline and after 6 weeks. [ Time Frame: baseline and after 6 weeks ]
- Mean change of Upper Extremity Motor Scores (ASIA-UEMS) between baseline, after 6 weeks and 6 months (follow-up) [ Time Frame: baseline, after 6 weeks and 6 months (follow-up) ]Maximum score is 50 (on a scale from 0 to 50) as the higher score indicate better motor functioning in upper extremities.
- Mean change of Grip strength between baseline, after 6 weeks and 6 months (follow-up) [ Time Frame: baseline, after 6 weeks and 6 months (follow-up) ]
- Mean change of Pinch strength between baseline, after 6 weeks and 6 months (follow-up) [ Time Frame: baseline, after 6 weeks and 6 months (follow-up) ]
- Mean change of upper extremity active range of motion between baseline, after 6 weeks and 6 months (follow-up) [ Time Frame: baseline, after 6 weeks and 6 months (follow-up) ]
- Mean change of SCIM-SR scores between baseline, after 6 weeks and 6 months (follow-up) [ Time Frame: baseline, after 6 weeks and 6 months (follow-up) ]Maximum score is 100 (on a scale from 0 to 100) as the higher score indicate better functioning.

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- incomplete motor spinal cord injury (AIS C-D)
- injury level C2-C8
- time since injury from 1 to 5 years
- to be able to sit
- motivation and ability to participate in intensive rehabilitation 3 times per week for 6 week period.
Exclusion Criteria:
- participation in other exercise study or technological-assisted upper extremity study
- unlikely completion of intervention and participation in follow up
- injuries that prevent training
- weak tolerance of intense training
- severe joint movement restriction or instability
- irreversible muscle contractures
- grade 4 on Modified Ashworth Scale in glenohumeral, elbow, wrist and finger joints
- recent significant forearm or hand injuries
- memory disorder
- orthopedic, rheumatic or neurological diseases (other than spinal cord injury) that prevent training

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04760470
Finland | |
Validia Rehabilitation | |
Helsinki, Finland |
Study Director: | Sinikka Hiekkala, PhD | The Finnish Association of People with Physical Disabilities |
Responsible Party: | Joonas Poutanen, Principal investigator, University of Helsinki |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT04760470 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
01012021 |
First Posted: | February 18, 2021 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | November 9, 2022 |
Last Verified: | November 2022 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
Spinal Cord Injuries Wounds and Injuries Spinal Cord Diseases |
Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Trauma, Nervous System |