Post Marketing Study of MagnetOs Putty Compared to Autograft in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion (PROOF)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04679844|
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : December 22, 2020
Last Update Posted : February 2, 2021
This is a phase IV post-marketing study for MagnetOs Putty. MagnetOs Putty is a synthetic bone graft extender product that is routinely used by surgeons as a treatment for patients with degenerative disc disease and undergoing spinal fusion surgery.
In this study, MagnetOs Putty will be used according to the latest U.S. Instructions For Use, specifically as a bone graft extender mixed with autograft in a 1:1 vol.% in the posterolateral spine.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Degenerative Disc Disease Spine Fusion||Device: MagnetOs Putty Device: Autograft Bone||Not Applicable|
In this study, following a screening period of a maximum of 30 days, 30 patients will undergo a two-level instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) procedure. Prior to surgery, each patient will be randomized to receive MagnetOs Putty on the assigned side of the spine and autograft bone on the other at the diseased levels. They will be followed up at discharge, Week 2, Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Month 12. An interim analysis will be performed once 15 patients have completed their Month 6 visit and have measurements for the endpoints available to measure effectiveness. The primary endpoint will be analyzed at Month 12.
In this study, MagnetOs Putty will be applied according to the latest Instructions for Use approved in the United States. Specifically, MagnetOs Putty will be used as a bone graft extender mixed with autograft in a 1:1 vol.% in patients with two-level degenerative disc disease with up to grade 1 spondylolisthesis requiring treatment with an instrumented posterolateral spine fusion procedure. The fusion procedure (PLF) will be left to the surgeon's discretion.
Radiographs will be obtained at Screening, Day 0, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 9. CT scans will only be obtained at Month 6 and Month 12.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||30 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||Intra-patient control. Each patient serves as their own control.|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Performance of MagnetOs Putty Compared to Autograft in Patients Undergoing Two-Level Instrumented Posterolateral Lumbar/Thoracolumbar Fusion (PLF)|
|Estimated Study Start Date :||February 2021|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||February 2022|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||August 2023|
Experimental: MagnetOs Putty
Device: MagnetOs Putty
MagnetOs Putty use in instrumented posterolateral fusion, 7cc-10cc mixed with autograft bone in a 1:1 ratio per spine level at the randomized assigned side.
Active Comparator: Autograft Bone
Device: Autograft Bone
Autologous bone graft used in instrumented posterolateral fusion, 7cc-10cc per level mixed with bone marrow aspirate/blood per spine level at the contralateral side.
- Radiographic Fusion by CT Scan [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]The rate of posterolateral lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion assessed by CT-scan at Month 12. Radiographic as determined by evidence of bridging trabeculae or continuous bony connection between the superior and inferior transverse processes.
- Radiographic Fusion by Plain Radiographs [ Time Frame: Week 6, Month 3, Month 9 ]The rate of posterolateral lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion assessed by plain radiographs.
- Radiographic Fusion by CT Scan [ Time Frame: Month 6 ]The rate of posterolateral lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion assessed by CT-scan at Month 6. Radiographic as determined by evidence of bridging trabeculae or continuous bony connection between the superior and inferior transverse processes.
- Functional Outcome by Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire [ Time Frame: Week 2, Week 6, Month 3, 6, 9, and 12 ]Functional outcome by the Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire. Patient-completed questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in those rehabilitating from low back pain. The lower the percentage the higher the patient's functionality. 0-20% minimal disability, 80-100% significant disability or bedridden.
- Back and Leg Pain by Visual Analog Pain Scale Questionnaire [ Time Frame: Week 2, Week 6, Month 3, 6, 9, and 12 ]Change in back and leg pain using Visual Analog Pain Scale (0-100). Patient-completed questionnaire scoring pain by using 100 mm line. Zero being no pain, 100 is worst pain imaginable.
- Neurologic Status by Physical Exam [ Time Frame: Week 2, Week 6, Month 3, 6, 9, and 12 ]Change in neurologic status by examination to document stable, improved, or deficits in condition. Stable or improved findings for lower extremities, specifically reflexes, muscle strength, sensory, and straight leg raise.
- Success Rate [ Time Frame: Week 2, Week 6, Month 3, 6, 9, and 12 ]Number of patients with secondary surgical interventions (SSI's) such as revisions, re-operations, removals, supplemental fixations, or any other procedure that adjusts or removes part of the original implant configuration with or without replacement of the components within 12 months of surgery.
- Safety Endpoint - number of patients with Adverse Events [ Time Frame: 12 Months ]The number of patients with Adverse Events from Screening up to Month 12 after surgery.
- Safety Endpoint - number of patients with Serious Adverse Events [ Time Frame: 12 Months ]The number of patients with Serious Adverse Events from Screening up to Month 12 after surgery
- Safety Endpoint - number of patients with Adverse Device Effects [ Time Frame: 12 Months ]The number of patients with Adverse Device Effects from Screening up to Month 12 after surgery.
- Safety Endpoint - number of patients with Device Related Complications [ Time Frame: 12 Months ]The number of patients with any complications considered to device related with 12 months after surgery.
- Health Economic - Duration of Surgery [ Time Frame: 12 Months ]Duration of surgery in minutes.
- Health Economic - Duration of Hospitalization [ Time Frame: 12 Months ]Duration of hospital stay in days.
- Health Economic - Return to Work [ Time Frame: 12 Months ]Time to return to work in days.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04679844
|Contact: Pascal Longlade||+31 (0)6 2221 00 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Trai email@example.com|
|United States, Michigan|
|Henry Ford Hospital System|
|Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48322|
|Contact: Kelly Tundo, RN, BSN|
|Study Director:||Pascal Longlade||Kuros BioSciences B.V.|