Comparison of BTD and BCD Based Regimens in the Treatment of AL Amyloidosis
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04612582|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : November 3, 2020
Last Update Posted : November 3, 2020
Research Objective:At present, there is no standard therapeutic regimen for monoclonal immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis in the world. To compare the efficacy and safety of the regimens between bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (BTD) and bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (BCD) in the treatment of AL amyloidosis, so as to provide more clinical evidence for the standard treatment for the disease.
Research Design:This study was designed as a prospective, randomized and controlled clinical study. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria of this study will be randomized to the BTD scheme group or BCD scheme group.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Immunoglobulin Light-Chain Amyloidosis||Drug: Thalidomide Drug: Cyclophosphamide||Phase 4|
Object and source:Patients meeting the inclusion criteria of AL amyloidosis are enrolled into the study. Screening failure rate ≤ 30%, follow-up dropout rate ≤ 10%.
Sample size evaluation: The complete remission rate (CR) and the very good partial remission rate (VGPR) were used as statistical indexes for hematology remission rate estimation. Referring to the previous literature, the CR and VGPR of bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (BTD) is 83%, and CR and VGPR of bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (BCD) is 43%. The boundary value is 0.1, according to the level of significance level α = 0.05, test efficacy 1 - β = 0.8, using the method of effectiveness test, using pass11 software calculation to estimate the sample size to be included in the group, the expected dropout rate is 20%, the total sample size is 70, 35 in each group.
Observation index:Before and after treatment, physical examination should be carried out every month. The following test should be required. Blood pressure
, blood routine, liver function, electrolyte, 24h urine volume, 24h urine protein quantity, urine protein/creatinine ratio, blood uric acid, serum albumin, urea nitrogen, creatinine, eGFR(estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate), blood lipids, infection index, NT-proBNP (N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide), TNT(Troponin-T), blood and urine free light chain should be detected respectively.
Quality assurance plan:The study shall be conducted in accordance with the current approved protocol and the July 1996 ICH drug clinical study management code (CPMP/ICH / 135/95) (ICH GCP), the Helsinki declaration, regulations and standard operating procedures.
Plan for missing data:(1)When the subject falls off, the researcher should contact the subject as soon as possible by means of visiting, making an appointment for follow-up, making phone calls, sending letters, etc., asking the reason, making record as much detail as possible.(2)All patients with abscission should be recorded for ITT analysis. There is no need for replacement for exfoliated patients. (3)If a patient withdraws from the study due to anaphylaxis, adverse reactions or ineffective treatment, the investigator shall take corresponding treatment measures according to the actual situation of the subject.
Statistical analysis plan:The main evaluation indexes were hematology CR and VGPR, organ function CR and VGPR. The statistical index of treatment effect is the number of patients who meet the criteria of CR and VGPR. Conclusion: if P > 0.05, H0 hypothesis cannot be rejected according to the test level of single side α = 0.05, that is to say, it cannot be judged that the treatment of light amyloidosis in BTD group is better than that in BCD group; if P ≤ 0.05, it can be considered that the treatment of light amyloidosis in BTD group is better than that in BCD group. The difference between the two groups was analyzed by chi square test or Fisher exact probability test as a secondary evaluation index (the overall survival rate and progression free survival period were observed after one year follow-up after six courses of treatment).The safety analysis set includes all cases entering the study and using at least one dose of the study drug. Chi square test or Fisher exact probability test were used to analyze the incidence of adverse events in the two groups. Chi square test or McNemar test were used to analyze the change of abnormal rate of laboratory indexes from baseline.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||70 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||Patients who meet the entry criteria will randomly enter the BTD or BCD treatment group according to the proportion of 1:1. The random code will be generated by computer and the random envelope will be made according to the random code. Treatment group included. Each code has a corresponding random envelope. According to the time sequence of subjects meeting the entry criteria, the random number of subjects will be given from small to large. The corresponding random envelope can only be opened during grouping. If a random number falls off in the middle of use, it can no longer be used.|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||A Comparative Study of Bortezomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethason and Bortezomib-Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethason in the Treatment of Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial（BTD-CHINA-TRIAL）|
|Actual Study Start Date :||January 1, 2020|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||January 31, 2023|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||June 30, 2023|
Group1 is the AL amyloidosis patients who have bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethason-based regimens for their treatment.
Bortezomib (d 1, 8, 15, 22, 1.3mg /m2, subcutaneous injection); thalidomide (d 1-28 50-100mg, oral); dexamethason (d 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, 23, 20mg, oral/intravenous injection) as a course of treatment, the patients will complete six courses of treatment after entering the group, and the total observation time is one year after the end of treatment.
Group2 is the AL amyloidosis patients who have bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethason-based regimens for their treatment.
Bortezomib (d 1, 8, 15, 22,1.3mg / m2, subcutaneous injection); cyclophosphamide (d 1, 2,900mg / m2, intravenous drip); dexamethason (d 1, 2, 8, 9,15, 16, 22, 23, 20mg, oral/intravenous injection) as a course of treatment, patients will complete six courses of treatment after entering the group, the overall observation time is one year after the end of treatment.
- Hematologic Response [ Time Frame: 1 year ]According to the criteria of hematologic response of AL amyloidosis.
- Organ Response [ Time Frame: 1 year ]According to the criteria of organ response of AL amyloidosis.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04612582
|Contact: Wenjian Wang, PhDfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Guangdong Provincial People'S Hospital||Recruiting|
|Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080|
|Contact: Wenjian Wang, PhD 0086-020-83827812-61421 email@example.com|
|Study Chair:||Wenjian Wang, PhD||Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital|