Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Ability of MammoWave in Breast Lesions Detection (DE-17-17)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04253366|
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : February 5, 2020
Last Update Posted : March 24, 2020
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Breast Cancer||Device: Clinical investigation device class IIa not marked CE||Not Applicable|
The number of participants will be 500 (for all the sites). The Study will be composed of two phases: a preliminary phase to 'optimize the imaging algorithm for each apparatus installed at each centre', where 15 healthy volunteers in each centre will be examined by MammoWave. In the second phase, the remaining people will be enrolled (Breast Lesions pts will be about 70% of total) and examined by MammoWave by the clinical investigator, and results will be compared with the effective diagnosis already obtained by standard clinical methods. BL includes malignant lesions (BC) and benign lesions, and may be palpable or non-palpable lesions. BL includes also isolated clustered microcalcifications.
At the end of the study, in each centre the clinical investigators will compare MammoWave output against the radiologist study output obtained using conventional exams.
In addition, at the end of the study, the MammoWave output will be centrally reviewed in blind by an independent radiologist in order to confirm the data and confirm centrally the comparisons performed locally. The primary goal of the clinical study is to assess Mammowave's ability in BL detection and differentiation.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||500 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||Clinical investigation with Medical Device class IIa|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||A Multicentric, Single Arm, Prospective, Stratified Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Ability of MammoWave in Breast Lesions Detection|
|Estimated Study Start Date :||June 1, 2020|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||September 30, 2020|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 30, 2020|
All patients perform standard breast screening and also MammoWave exam.
Device: Clinical investigation device class IIa not marked CE
Patients should perform MammoWave exam. A short visit should be performed and during this visit a qualitative differentiation would be performed between patients with high density breast, and patients with low density breast. After the patients will be ready for the MammoWave exam. The exam will be composed of two phases: the data acquisition and the data processing. During the acquisition that should takes about 10 minutes the patients would be lying in a prone position, on a bed which is part of the MammoWave. The upper part of MammoWave has a container cup shape, which contains the breast, which also has the function of separate it from the internal parts of the device. After patient is on the bed and MammoWave would start to perform the acquisition. Once the acquisition is completed, the data will be processed through an imaging algorithm, which is integrated in the device. The final output will be composed by one or more images, plus one or more parameters describing the images.
- MammoWave sensitivity (number of 'true positive' results) [ Time Frame: During the procedure ]MammoWave sensitivity (number of 'true positive' results) compared to Reference Standard
- MammoWave specificity and sensitivity (against Reference Standard) [ Time Frame: During the baseline ]MammoWave specificity and sensitivity (against Reference Standard like Mammography, MRI and/or Echography)
- Percentage of correct BL localization in terms of quadrant (against Reference Standard) [ Time Frame: During the baseline ]Percentage of correct BL localization in terms of quadrant comparing to Reference Standard like Mammography, MRI and/or Echography
- Absolute and rate agreement between different evaluator (i.e. local radiologist versus central) [ Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year ]Absolute and rate agreement between different evaluator local radiologist versus central, in order to avoid mistakes in the MammoWave output.
- Sensitivity for each breast density group [ Time Frame: During the baseline ]Sensitivity of MammoWave according to different types of breast density groups
- Sensitivity for patients which had recent mammography [ Time Frame: During the baseline ]Sensitivity for patients which had performed recently mammography exam.
- Patient satisfaction questionnaire. [ Time Frame: During the baseline ]
Patient satisfaction questionnaire output according to their experience performing MammoWave test based on 12 questions:
n° 2 "Multiple Choice questions"
YES, NO, explain (with open-ended text area) regarding:
- The effective execution of MammoWave
The willing to promote MammoWave
n° 5 "5 point Numeric Rating scale" ranging from 1 to 5 (1=Not at all, 5= A lot) regarding the subjective evaluation of MammoWave.
n° 5 "3 point Numeric Rating scale" ranging from 1 to 3 (1=less, 3= more) regarding the comparative evaluation of MammoWave vs Conventional tests (Mammography, Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging).
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04253366
|Contact: Gianluigi Tiberi||0039 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Sabatino Tiberiemail@example.com|
|Istituto Clinico Humanitas|
|Rozzano, Milano, Italy, 20089|
|Contact: Daniela BERNARDI, Doctor 00393398023851 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Martino Di Genova|
|Genova, Italy, 16132|
|Contact: Alberto TAGLIAFICO 010/555 3067 Alberto.Tagliafico@unige.it|
|Hospital Virgen de la Salud|
|Toledo, Spain, 16132|
|Contact: Cristina ROMERO CASTELLANO, Doctor 0034925269200 email@example.com|