Educational Nursing Intervention on Nutrition Intake Related Chemotherapy Induced Side-effects' Self-care Among the Patients With Colorectal Cancer
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04160650|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : November 13, 2019
Last Update Posted : June 4, 2020
The prevalence of malnutrition is common among patients with colorectal cancer. Chemotherapy induced side effects may impact negatively on nutrition intake thus increase the risk of malnutrition and serious complications for patients. Nurse-led empowering education may have positive effect on self-care activity of this patient group. Therefore, purpose is to test the effect of educational nursing intervention on self-care activity and knowledge level among patients with colorectal cancer during the chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes are quality of life and malnutrition.
A two-arm, single center, patient blinded superiority trial with stratified randomization (1:1) and with repeated measures is used to measure the effectiveness of face-to-face education on nutrition intake related chemotherapy induced side-effects' self-care compared to standard care. Eligibility criteria are adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer and receiving intra venous chemotherapy treatment. Patients are recruited in one university hospital outpatient clinic in Finland. Experienced oncology nurse delivers the intervention two weeks after the first chemotherapy. Primary outcomes are activation in self-care and knowledge level. Secondary outcomes are quality of life and malnutrition risk measured at baseline (M0) and after eight (M1) and 16 weeks (M2) after the intervention.
The study will provide knowledge of nurse-led educational intervention on self-care activation related to chemotherapy-induced side effects that may deteriorate nutrition intake among patients with colorectal cancer. The findings will contribute to patient education and better self-care of nutrition related side effects, thus better quality of life.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Patient Empowerment Patient Activation Self Care Cancer of Colon Cancer of Rectum||Behavioral: Educational nursing intervention on nutrition intake related chemotherapy induced side-effects' self-care among the patients with colorectal cancer||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||154 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||A two-arm, single center, patient blinded superiority trial with stratified randomization (1:1) and with repeated measures|
|Masking Description:||Participants are blinded after assignment to interventions, those in intervention and control groups are not aware which treatment they get.|
|Primary Purpose:||Supportive Care|
|Official Title:||Educational Nursing Intervention Among the Patients With Colorectal Cancer - a Research Protocol of Randomised Controlled Trial|
|Actual Study Start Date :||October 21, 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||December 31, 2021|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 31, 2021|
Experimental: Educational nursing intervention
Patients in experimental group receive standard care and one-hour educational session. Patients are provided knowledge of
Behavioral: Educational nursing intervention on nutrition intake related chemotherapy induced side-effects' self-care among the patients with colorectal cancer
This is an educational intervention which aims to answer the questions:
No Intervention: Standard care
Patients in control group receive standard care, information of
They receive a self-monitoring diary, which includes only side effects and their intensity (NRS 0-10).
- The rate of knowledge level (Knowledge test of malnutrition, nutrition impact side effects and their self-care, RasOma, Tuominen et al. 2019) [ Time Frame: From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after the intervention ]Knowledge is seen as essential for empowerment (Rankinen et al. 2014; Castro et al. 2016). It is assumed that knowledge level is better in the intervention group compared to control group. Knowledge test was developed in the research group, which included an oncologist, a dietitian, oncology nurses and a researcher. The instrument includes 15 items (yes/no, right answer=1 point, wrong answer=0 points).
- The rate of self care activation (Patient Activation Measure PAM, Insignia Health; Hibbard et al. 2004) [ Time Frame: From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after the intervention ]Activated individuals have the knowledge, skills and confidence to self-manage their health. PAM shows how ready, willing and able an individual is to manage his or her health and healthcare.It is assumed that patients in the intervention group are more activated to self-care their side effects. The activation score is based on a 0-100 point scale. A change of 3-4 points is associated with the difference between engaging and not engaging in particular behaviors. Activation self care is rated from 1 to 4 (1= low activation level; believing the patient role is important, 2=low activation level; having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, 3=moderate activation level; actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and 4=high activation level; staying the course even in stressful situations)(InsigniaHealth 2017).
- The incidence of malnutrition risk (Nutritional Risk Screening NRS2002, Kondrup et al. 2003) [ Time Frame: From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after hte intervention ]Nutrition consultations have affected positively on patients' food intake and nutritional status (Kiss & Krishnasamy 2014; Tu et al. 2013; Ravasco 2011, 2012). Patients with a total score of ≥3 are classified as nutritionally at risk. It is assumed that malnutrition risk is lesser in the intervention group compared to control group.
- The rate of quality of life (The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale - Colorectal, FACT-C, Cella et al. 1993) [ Time Frame: From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after the intervention ]The risk of malnutrition is strongly associated with QoL in cancer patients initiating chemotherapy (Calderon et al. 2018).The FACT-C questionnaire consists of 36 items on a 5-point Likert scale in four areas of well-being: physical (0-28 points), social (0-28 points), emotional (0-24 points), functional (0-28 points) and CRC subscale (0-28 points). Higher score means better QoL (34 points=low level, 34-68 points= satisfactory, 68-102 points=average and 102-136 points=high)(Ganesh et al. 2016; Goździewicz et al. 2017).
- Incidence of interruption, transfer and cancellation of the treatments [ Time Frame: From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after the intervention ]Better nutritional status is related to better treatment effect and better well-being, which may lead to better adherence to treatment schedule (Ravasco et al. 2012). Data is collected from patients' records.
- Incidence of morbidity [ Time Frame: From the baseline to 16 weeks after hte intervention ]Worse nutritional status is related to greater morbidity (Ravasco et al. 2012). Data is collected from patients' records.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04160650
|Contact: Leena Tuominen, MNScemail@example.com|
|Contact: Marita Ritmala-Castrén, PhD||+358503095518||marita-ritmala-castrén@hus.fi|
|Principal Investigator:||Helena Leino-Kilpi, PhD||University of Turku|