Comparison of Surgery and Medicine on the Impact of Diverticulitis (COSMID) Trial (COSMID)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04095663|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : September 19, 2019
Last Update Posted : November 21, 2019
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Diverticulitis||Procedure: Partial Colectomy Other: Medical Management||Not Applicable|
For over 50 years, professional society recommendations for the management of uncomplicated diverticulitis included early elective surgery to prevent the need for an emergency operation and avoid the risk of colostomy. Over the last 15 years the notion that a patient must have a certain number of episodes of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) before undergoing elective colectomy has changed dramatically. This was, in part, due to studies showing that emergency surgery for complicated disease is much more likely to be needed during the first episode of diverticulitis, making the notion of prophylactic elective colectomy for AUD less relevant. Furthermore, clinicians realized that most recurrent episodes of AUD could be managed with outpatient antibiotics alone and that "best medical management" - including fiber supplementation, mesalazine, rifamycin and probiotics - could reduce symptoms between episodes of AUD. All of the components of best medical management have some, albeit limited, evidence of effectiveness, most in improving symptoms rather than reducing the risk of recurrence and are relatively safe and inexpensive. Best medical management is far less invasive than elective surgery but infrequently prescribed the US, in part because of limited insurance coverage. Alternatively, resection removes the diseased segment of colon, does relieve symptoms and decreases the risk of recurrence.
In 2014, guidelines from the American Society of Colorectal Surgeons (ASCRS) abandoned "episode count" as an indication for surgery in patients with AUD and instead recommended individualizing the decision to operate for AUD based on the "effects on lifestyle (professional and personal) of recurrent attacks". Decision making about surgery in patients with lingering symptoms after recovery from an episode of AUD has not been the specific focus of an ASCRS guideline, but recommendations about elective surgery emphasize individualizing decision making based on the overall impact of the disease on the patient.These recommendations for individualization of treatment based on the quality of life (QoL) impact of recurrent AUD and lingering symptoms highlight the decision that hundreds of thousands of people now have to make each year. Based on the effect of the disease on their QoL they must choose between two very different treatment options: elective colectomy vs. best medical management. While the recommendation to individualize treatment based on the QoL impact is a step forward in advancing patient-centered care, the comparative effectiveness of these two treatments on symptoms and QoL has not been well studied.
This will be a multi-site, open randomized trial in which participants with either recurrent AUD or lingering symptoms after an episode of AUD are randomized to one of two initial treatment strategies, elective segmental colectomy (performed laparoscopically when possible) and best medical management.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||500 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Comparison of Surgery and Medicine on the Impact of Diverticulitis (COSMID) Trial|
|Actual Study Start Date :||October 1, 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||March 1, 2023|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||April 1, 2024|
Active Comparator: Partial Colectomy
Elective segmental colectomy for diverticular disease involves removal of the segment of colon (most commonly sigmoid and/or left colon) where there has been disease identified by computed tomography imaging or colonoscopy. Elective colectomy usually removes the affected colon along with adjacent segments that have diverticula, with a primary anastomosis performed to reestablish bowel continuity. Most surgeons now perform the procedure using a laparoscopic approach, when possible, and sometimes use a temporary, protective stoma if the re-connection is considered high-risk. The technique for laparoscopic resection is not specified by the protocol (allows for any number of laparoscopic port sites, all incision types, hand-assistance and robotic) with details of the technique recorded. If randomized to elective colectomy, patients will be encouraged to undergo the procedure within 6 weeks of assignment.
Procedure: Partial Colectomy
Most partial colectomies are performed using a laparoscopic approach, when possible, and surgeons sometimes use a temporary, protective stoma if the re-connection is considered high risk.
Active Comparator: Medical Management
Medical management for diverticular disease has been used for over 30 years and includes a set of interventions, all components of which have been the subject of small, but often positive trials. All patients randomized to medical management or who select it as their treatment in the observational cohort will view a video (provided in English and Spanish) that explains each element of the medical management "toolbox": diet and exercise recommendations, fiber supplementation (e.g., augmenting dietary fiber or over the counter fiber supplements), with mesalazine tablets or suppositories, probiotics and rifamycin. In consultation with their physician, they will be recommended to a regimen of diet and exercise and fiber supplementation. Clinicians will be asked to consider rifamycin (dose/frequency) for those with AUD who are not responding to diet and exercise and mesalazine (dose/frequency) for those with lingering symptoms who are not responding to diet and exercise.
Other: Medical Management
Patients will be offered a varying combination of tools from the best medical management "toolbox" (diet and exercise, fiber supplementation/probiotics, and rifamycin/mesalazine) depending on what they have already tried. Based on the "evidence-based best medical toolbox" clinicians will be asked to consider rifamycin (dose/frequency) for those with AUD who are not responding to diet and exercise and mesalazine (dose/frequency) for those with lingering symptoms who are not responding to diet and exercise.
- Patient-reported quality of life as measured by Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) [ Time Frame: Mean GIQLI at 6, 9, and 12 months following randomization to treatment ]The primary outcome of mean GIQLI at 6, 9, and 12 months will be assessed using an ANCOVA regression model that adjusts for an indicator of randomized treatment group, the GIQLI score as measured at baseline prior to randomization, as well as factors used to stratify randomization.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04095663
|Contact: Kelsey M Pullar, MPH||206 email@example.com|
|Contact: Erin E Fannon||206 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator:||David R Flum, MD||University of Washington|