Comparison of Efficacy of Sensory Integration Therapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03888508|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 25, 2019
Last Update Posted : November 22, 2019
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Cerebral Palsy||Other: SIT||Not Applicable|
- Study will be started after obtaining ethical clearance and registration with Clinical trials registry of India
- Hindi translation of SPCQ-2(Sensory profile caregiver questionnaire 2) by subject expert by forward and independent backward translation .
- Consecutive children of either sexes between 3-12 years with a clinical diagnosis of spastic cerebral palsy will be examined by the investigator and those having sensory abnormalities as screened by Sensory profile caregiver questionnaire 2 will be included in the study group.
- Those children who screen positive for sensory abnormalities fulfilling the inclusion criteria would be enrolled in the study after obtaining informed consent from the parents or guardian.
- Once enrolled children would be randomized into 2 groups , using a computer generated random number sequence, an interventional group receiving sensory integration therapy along with standard therapy and a group receiving standard therapy alone.
- Concealment of the random allocation would be ensured by placing the allocation sequence in serially numbered, tamper proof, opaque and sealed envelopes(by a person other than primary investigator to ensure blinding and further observation bias)
- Post - enrollment - Baseline clinical and demographic data will be recorded along with associated co morbidities (maladaptive behavior, sensory deficits and motor problems).
- Pre-intervention a baseline motor skill will be obtained using Gross Motor Function Measure -88 and behavioral assessment would be done using Child Behaviour Checklist within 7 days of starting therapy in both arms (by pediatric neurologist ,child psychologist respectively and who is unaware of the randomization and allocation to both arms to prevent observer bias).
- Pre-intervention investigator would also interact with the parents or the primary care giver and record parent's assessment of severity of sensory abnormalities in 5 main domains - auditory , visual, tactile, proprioceptive and vestibular senses on a 10 item Likert scale and also assess Quality of life using Pediatric Quality of life using Pediatric Quality of life scale
- All children would be followed at set intervals from initiation of therapy as noted below ;
- Weekly for 2 weeks then fortnightly for next 10 weeks to ensure proper technique and compliance.
- At 3 months the blinded outcome assessor and child psychologist will re evaluate the enrolled candidate to determine for any change by using Gross Motor Function Measure -88 , 10 item parent rated Likert scale, Child Behaviour Checklist and Pediatric Quality of life as compared to baseline within 7 days of completion of therapy in both arms
The first visit would be primarily aimed at reinforcing the techniques of therapy and clarifying parent's doubts. At 3 month visit child would be evaluated and re-assessed using the scores- 10 item Likert scale rated by parents, Gross Motor Function Measure -88 and Pediatric Quality of life scale . Parents would be encouraged to bring one random home video of child doing activity-based therapy at 2 weeks wherever feasible . The video would be used for ,
- Assessing the correct technique
- Suggesting modifications in the activity schedule if required
- Helps in ensuring adherence to technique
Compliance would be ensured by the
- Activity log
- Telephonic re-enforcement from the primary investigator weekly
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||30 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||Single Blind Randomized Controlled Parallel Design trial|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||Comparison of Efficacy of Sensory Integration Therapy as an Adjunct to Standard Care With Standard Care Alone in Improving Gross Motor Skills in Cerebral Palsy Children With Sensory Processing Abnormalities|
|Actual Study Start Date :||July 25, 2018|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||August 16, 2019|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||August 16, 2019|
Experimental: SIT plus standard therapy
Sensory interventions will include maneuvers for both hypo and hyper-reactive behaviors in five senses such as tactile, vestibular, proprioception, vision and auditory using a sensory integration kit and other items available at home Sensory integration kit will be prepared which consists of varying textures from soft to hard items (wool, jute, sand paper, velvet), picture cards, sensory brush, elastic band(Thera tube) and also usage of other home based items such as swings, sofa/bed, textured board, black board, wet chalks and paint. Each session would take approx 60 minutes/ day with each sensory stimulus given for 10-30 minutes 6 d Conventional physiotherapy, occupational,behavioural intervention and pharmacotherapy that they are already receiving as a standard therapy
sensory integration therapy along with standard therapy.
Primary care giver will be trained to perform sensory integration therapy at home.
. Sensory interventions will include maneuvers for both hypo and hyper-reactive behaviors in five senses as tactile, vestibular, proprioception, vision and auditory using a sensory integration kit and other items available at home
Daily sessions of approx 60 minutes/ day with each sensory stimulus given for 10-30 minutes 6 days in a week will be done.
Other Name: Standard therapy
No Intervention: Standard therapy alone
Standard therapy -Conventional physiotherapy, occupational,behavioural intervention and pharmacotherapy that they are already receiving
- Mean change in GMFM-88 Score from baseline [ Time Frame: 3 months ]
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88)
The gross motor function measure-88 (GMFM-88) is a well-known scoring system, which assesses gross motor development in children with CP over time in 5 domains
A (lying and rolling), 17 items
B (sitting), 20 items
C (crawling and kneeling), 14 items
D (standing), 13 items;
E (walking, running, and jumping), 24 items.
- Mean T score change from baseline in CBCL [ Time Frame: 3 months ]Child behaviour checklist (CBCL)-140 items-Self-administered or administered through an interview; norm referenced comprehensive measure of behavior; examines aggression, hyperactivity, bullying, conduct problems, defiance, violence Three formats: Teacher Report Forms, Youth Self-Reports, and Direct Observation Forms Yields standard scores: Total Competence, Total Problems, Internalizing, Externalizing, Attention Problems
- Mean score change from baseline in Pediatric quality of life scale from baseline [ Time Frame: 3 months ]PedsQL-The PedsQL measurement model is a modular approach to measure health related quality of life (HRQOL) in healthy children and adolescents and those with acute and chronic health conditions. The PedsQL measurement model integrates seamlessly both generic core scales and disease-specific modules into one measurement system. It's a brief 23 item multi-dimensional scale, comprising questions in physical, emotional, social and school functioning sectors. Takes around 4 minutes to administer the scale. Has both self-report and proxy report for the children for various age groups (ages 2-18; Child Self-Report Ages 5-7, 8-12, 13-18; Parent Proxy-Report Ages 2-4, 5-7, 8-12, 13-18yrs ). It was found to be reliable between raters and across time.
- Mean score change from baseline in parent rated 10 item Likert scale [ Time Frame: 3 months ]Likert scale-This is a scale designed to assess the severity of sensory abnormalities in children as per parents. Around 10 questions have been used, 2 each from -visual, tactile, vestibular, proprioceptive and auditory domains. These questions have been framed based on the most common sensory symptoms observed in these children. The scale rates from 1 to 5 , where 1 indicates the lower end of symptom spectrum and 5 the highest end. It is used pre as well as post intervention to compare for any change in sensory processing abnormalities.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03888508
|All india institute of Medical sciences|
|Delhi, South Delhi, India, 110029|
|Principal Investigator:||Sheffali Gulati, M.D||Professor|