Virtual Environment Rehabilitation for Patients With Motor Neglect Trial (VERMONT)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03887962|
Recruitment Status : Enrolling by invitation
First Posted : March 25, 2019
Last Update Posted : May 30, 2019
Motor neglect describes a loss of function without a loss of strength, reflexes or sensation. Motor neglect has been described in patients with traumatic brain injury, stroke and chronic pain conditions, e.g. complex regional pain syndrome. These conditions affect hundreds of thousands of patients in the UK each year and motor neglect is a significant obstacle in their rehabilitation towards a good outcome. By focussing on improving motor neglect, outcomes including function and quality of life for these groups of patients may significantly improve.
Motor neglect is potentially reversible. Rehabilitation using repetition, feedback and motivation are beneficial for optimal outcome. Current protocols use face-to-face physical therapies which can not optimise intensity due to a lack of resources. Furthermore, engagement with exercise is recognised to be poor, in part, due to a lack of attention. Innovative technologies may well improve engagement. Furthermore, telemedicine, or remote delivery of healthcare, offer opportunities in resource management, which can be delivered through the use of such innovative technologies.
Virtual reality systems have been designed and utilised in rehabilitation in various conditions, e.g post-stroke, cerebral palsy and Parkinson's disease. Studies demonstrate improved function in both upper and lower limbs. Potentially more effective treatments for motor neglect utilising such technology are therefore available but need more formal evaluation.
This protocol describes a Phase II randomised controlled trial for both in-patients and out-patients requiring rehabilitation with motor neglect from neurological causes (stroke, traumatic brain injury) and chronic pain conditions (Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, chronic low back pain and referred leg pain (sciatica)). The intervention will be a novel interactive virtual reality system using established technology and tailored software used in conjunction with a treadmill. The control group will be the same screen showing random static images whilst on the treadmill. Rehabilitation for each group will be offered in 3-4 sessions per week for 2 weeks. Each session will last about 30 minutes supervised by a physiotherapist. Follow-up will be by questionnaire at weeks 2, 6 and 12 and by face-to-face consultation at weeks 2 and 12.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Complex Regional Pain Syndromes Fibromyalgia Stroke Traumatic Brain Injury Osteoarthritis Back Pain Sciatica||Device: Virtual Environment Biofeedback Device: Treadmill walking with no Virtual Environment Biofeedback||Not Applicable|
Show Detailed Description
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||40 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||Randomised single-blind controlled trial|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
|Masking Description:||Data collected by unblended participant and research assistant. Outcomes analysed by blinded team and statistician Objective machine outcomes are blinded|
|Official Title:||Trial of Virtual Reality Biofeedback in Patients With Motor Neglect From Chronic Pain or Cerebrovascular Disease|
|Actual Study Start Date :||May 1, 2017|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||May 1, 2020|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||November 1, 2020|
Experimental: Virtual Environment feedback
Subjects will be instructed to walk on a treadmill, moving at a constant speed, following a "virtual path" displayed on a flat screen in front of them. In this group, the gait task may involve avoiding virtual obstacles on the screen in the path or stepping on targets as determined by the therapist.
Device: Virtual Environment Biofeedback
Treadmill walking. Modified available technology for gait capture. Tailored software for virtual environment rendering and immersive qualities
Other Name: Real time biofeedback
Active Comparator: Control
Subjects will be instructed to walk on a treadmill, moving at a constant speed. The flat screen will play random scenes from the virtual reality environment and thus control for attentional and non-movement related clues.
Device: Treadmill walking with no Virtual Environment Biofeedback
Treadmill walking. Flat screen / no virtual environment to act as attentional control.
Other Name: Control group
- Distance walked (machine-reported) [ Time Frame: Week 2 ]Distance walked in 5 minutes at weeks 2 compared to baseline (% change)
- Lower Extremity Functional Index [ Time Frame: Week 2 ]Self-reported 20-question Functional Activity Questionnaire with minimal clinically important difference of 9 (range 0-80). Each question scored 0-4. Low scores indicate less function.
- Lower Extremity Functional Index [ Time Frame: Week 24 ]Self-reported 20-question Functional Activity Questionnaire with minimal clinically important difference of 9 (range 0-80). Each question scored 0-4. Low scores indicate less function.
- Brief Pain Inventory [ Time Frame: Weeks 2,12,24 ]Self-reported questionnaire - mean score (11-point analogue scale). High scores indicate more pain. % change from baseline will be calculated
- Human Activity Profile [ Time Frame: Weeks 2,12,24 ]Self-reported questionnaire (0-94 points). Low scores indicate loss of function.
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [ Time Frame: Weeks 2,12,24 ]Self-reported questionnaire (0-21 on each dimension of Anxiety and Depression). High scores indicate high Anxiety or Depression
- Neglect Like Symptom Questionnaire [ Time Frame: Weeks 2,12,24 ]Self-reported questionnaire (1-6). High scores indicate more Neglect-like symptoms
- Satisfaction questionnaire [ Time Frame: Weeks 2, 24 ]Self-reported questionnaire. 0-5 score. High scores indicate high satisfaction
- Machine-reported average stride length [ Time Frame: Week 2 ]Average stride length (cm)
- Machine-reported number of steps [ Time Frame: Week 2 ]Number of steps (whole number)
- Machine-reported gait symmetry [ Time Frame: Week 2 ]Asymmetry (left-right split presented in numerical form)
- Machine-reported gait timing [ Time Frame: Week 2 ]Timing (Proportion of gait with planted foot and raised foot measured as %).
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03887962
|Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust|
|Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ|
|Principal Investigator:||Nicholas GN Shenker, MD||Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust|