Cone Beam Computed Tomography Following Thrombectomy (Hemathromb)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03869567|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : March 11, 2019
Last Update Posted : March 11, 2019
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Stroke Hemorrhage||Device: cone beam CT||Not Applicable|
Until December 2014, intravenous thrombolysis was the only reperfusion therapy proven to be effective within 4 hours of a cerebral infarction and several studies showed a clear functional benefit of thrombectomy in combination with thrombolysis in the first six hours of proximal arterial occlusion. Cerebral haemorrhages following reperfusion treatments involve not only rupture of the blood-brain barrier, but also direct damage to vessels related to the equipment used and secondary toxicity to thrombolytics. The rupture of the blood-brain barrier which results from ischemia / reperfusion is responsible for stagnation of the contrast product on the exams performed after thrombectomy, but it is difficult to distinguish hyperdensities related to the stagnation of contrast product and Hemorrhage on a conventional scanner. Several techniques are available to evaluate the hyperdensities post endovascular cerebral reperfusion including: the dual energy ct, the flat panel CT performed in the angiography room and the conventional scanner. The Cone beam CT is a relevant exam because it is performed in the angiography room and does not require transporting the patient who can be agitated or intubated until the scanner. The reference imaging is the double energy scanner performed at the thrombectomy outlet. Some studies have shown an excellent negative predictive value of the flat panel CT to eliminate haemorrhage in post-thrombectomy but no study directly compared the results of the flat panel with the CT performed in immediate post-thrombectomy and even less with the double energy scanner, it is therefore difficult to assert the sensitivity and exact specificity of this exam to detect and distinguish haemorrhage from contrast stagnation. The investigators propose a direct comparison of the cone beam CT with the dual energy CT performed at the exit of thrombectomy.
Method: consecutive patients presenting acute ischemic stroke candidates to thrombectomy will be enrolled in one hospital center. A cone beam Ct will be performed at the end of the procedure as well as a dual energy CT and finally a CT 24 h after the thrombectomy. Predictive factors of hemorrhage transformation such blood barrier disruption will be studied secondarily.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||66 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Cone Beam Computed Tomography Following Thrombectomy : Identification of Hemorrhage and Distinction From Contrast Accumulation Due to Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption|
|Actual Study Start Date :||February 11, 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||August 11, 2020|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||September 11, 2020|
Experimental: Cone beam CT
A cone beam CT wll be performed just after thrombectomy on patients with acute ischemic stroke
Device: cone beam CT
Just after thrombectomy, a cone beam CT will be done, while patient is on angiography table, in order to determine if hemorrhage image is due to contrast accumulation or blood-brain barrier disruption.
- Hemorrhage presence [ Time Frame: up to two days ]hemorrhage presence or not is determined with cone beam and scanner images
- Number of patients with hemorrhagic transformation [ Time Frame: 24 hours from symptom onset ]Any type of parenchyma hemorrhage according to ECASS II criteria (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study 2). Scores are HI1, HI2, PH1 or PH2. HI1 = small petechia around stroke area. HI2 = confluent petechia in the stroke area. PH1 = Hematoma with less than 30% stroke weight. PH2 = Hematoma with more than 30% stroke weight.
- Health deterioration [ Time Frame: 24 hours from symptom onset ]Any deterioration in NIHSS score (NIHSS : National Institute of Heath Stroke ) or death combined with intracerebral hemorrhage. Scale of NIHSS score : 1 to 42. Minimum score : 1. Maximum score : 42. 1-4 : minor stroke. 5-15 : mild stroke. 15-20 : acute stroke. More than 20 : major stroke.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03869567
|Contact: Cyril Chivot, Dr||(33)email@example.com|
|Amiens, France, 80054|
|Contact: Cyril CHIVOT, Dr (33)322087538 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Sallah MATTOUG, Dr (33)32288371 email@example.com|
|Principal Investigator:||Cyril Chivot, Dr||CHU Amiens|