Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe TBI, Phase 3 (BOOST3)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03754114|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : November 27, 2018
Last Update Posted : March 24, 2020
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Brain Injuries, Traumatic||Other: ICP + PbtO2 guided management strategy Other: ICP guided management strategy||Not Applicable|
BOOST3 is a randomized clinical trial to determine the comparative effectiveness of two strategies for monitoring and treating patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the intensive care unit (ICU).
When a person has a TBI, their injured brain can swell over a period of hours or days. If the brain swells too much, the pressure in the skull increases and becomes dangerous, causing further injury to the brain. To try to prevent this, doctors usually insert a device, an ICP monitor, into the brain through a hole in the skull of people with severe TBI. An ICP monitor measures the pressure inside the skull. Most doctors agree that it is important to measure and prevent high ICP. Patients with injured brains also suffer additional injury to the brain if the amount of oxygen in the brain gets too low. Some doctors also insert a second device, a PbtO2 monitor, in the brain through the same or a second hole in the skull to measure brain tissue oxygen. A PbtO2 monitor measures how much oxygen is in a small area of the brain near the tip of the monitor. Other doctors think this is unnecessary and unhelpful. Both monitoring devices are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Health Canada for patients with TBI. Both are commonly used. The ICP and PbtO2 goals guided by these monitors are used to help doctors adjust their treatment choices. Treatments include kinds and doses of medications and the amount of intravenous fluids given, ventilator (breathing machine) settings, need for blood transfusions, and other medical care. Each of these treatment decisions is intended to improve outcomes. However, each treatment decision also involves potential risks. Different treatment decisions may result in different risks. This study will also help doctors better understand these risks. This study is funded by the National Institutes of Health because it answers questions important to the care of patients with TBI.
This study is a two-arm, single-blind, randomized, controlled, phase III, multi-center trial of ICU monitoring and treatment strategies for patients with severe TBI. It will compare the efficacy of ICU care guided by PbtO2 and ICP monitoring versus monitoring of ICP alone in the first 5 days after injury. Only subjects who have severe TBI and require invasive monitoring, according to Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) and American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement (ACS TQIP) guidelines, will be enrolled. All participants in this study will have both ICP monitors and PbtO2 monitors. Half of the participants will be randomized to an arm that includes treatment informed by PbtO2 and ICP, and half will be randomized to an arm that treats only ICP.
The PbtO2 values of those in the ICP only arm will be masked, so that the treating physicians will not be guided by PbtO2 information. Participants in the PbtO2 and ICP arm will have PbtO2 monitored and low measurements treated. Treatments to address physiological goals in both arms will follow a clinical standardization plan. Participants will be followed for 6 months and occurrence of serious adverse events or death will be recorded. Participants will have a follow-up interview to assess their level of recovery approximately 6 months post injury.
To reduce the likelihood of imbalance of important prognostic factors between groups, a covariate-adjusted randomization scheme will be used in this study. Adjustment variables are clinical site and probability of a poor outcome as defined by the IMPACT core model.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||1094 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
|Masking Description:||The outcomes assessors will be blinded to the treatment assignment of the participant.|
|Official Title:||Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe TBI (BOOST3): A Comparative Effectiveness Study to Test the Efficacy of a Prescribed Treatment Protocol Based on Monitoring the Partial Pressure of Brain Tissue Oxygen.|
|Actual Study Start Date :||August 28, 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||July 1, 2023|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||July 1, 2023|
Active Comparator: ICP only
ICP guided management strategy: Care in the ICU of research participants randomized to this arm will be guided by a monitoring and treatment strategy in which doctors try to prevent high intracranial pressure (ICP) caused by a swollen brain. This strategy is one of two alternative strategies that is currently used in standard care of patients with traumatic brain injury.
Other: ICP guided management strategy
In this management strategy, the physiological goal is to avoid ICP from exceeding 22 mm Hg. ICP and PbtO2 are monitored using devices inserted into the brain through a hole in the skull, but PbtO2 is not used to guide care. These devices are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Health Canada, and are routinely used in patients with severe TBI. Doctors adjust their treatment choices to try to achieve this ICP goal. Treatments include kinds and doses of medications and the amount of intravenous fluids given, ventilator (breathing machine) settings, need for blood transfusions, and other medical care. This management strategy is used to guide care for 5 days in this research study.
Active Comparator: ICP + PbtO2
ICP + PbtO2 guided management strategy: Care in the ICU of research participants randomized to this arm will be guided by a monitoring and treatment strategy in which doctors try to prevent high intracranial pressure (ICP), and also try to prevent low PbtO2 (brain tissue oxygen levels). This strategy is one of two alternative strategies that is currently used in standard care of patients with traumatic brain injury.
Other: ICP + PbtO2 guided management strategy
In this management strategy, the physiological goal is to avoid ICP from exceeding 22 mm Hg and to avoid PbtO2 dropping below 20 mm Hg. ICP and PbtO2 are monitored using devices inserted into the brain through a hole in the skull. These devices are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Health Canada for patients with severe TBI. The devices are used in standard care at hospitals participating in this research study. Doctors adjust their treatment choices to try to achieve these ICP and PbtO2 goals. Treatments include kinds and doses of medications and the amount of intravenous fluids given, ventilator (breathing machine) settings, need for blood transfusions, and other medical care. This management strategy is used to guide care for 5 days in this research study.
- Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) [ Time Frame: 6 months ]The Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) is a global scale for functional outcome, in which higher scores indicate better outcomes. The GOS-E rates patient status into one of eight categories. A GOS-E score of 1 indicates death, 2 indicates a vegetative state, 3 or 4 indicates severe disability, 5 or 6 indicates moderate disability, and 7 or 8 indicates good recovery. The categories of severe disability, moderate disability and good recovery are subdivided into a lower and upper category.
- Survival [ Time Frame: At discharge from hospital, an average of 19 days ]Survival at discharge from hospital
- Total Brain Hypoxia Exposure [ Time Frame: Inclusive of up to 5 days of study intervention ]The cumulative area on the time versus brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) curve in which PbtO2 is less than 20 mmHg.
- Cognition: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test [ Time Frame: 6 months ]A measure of verbal learning and memory.
- Cognition: Trail Making Test Part A+B [ Time Frame: 6 months ]A measure of attention, visual-motor tracking and executive functioning.
- Cognition: WAIS IV Processing Speed Index [ Time Frame: 6 months ]A measure of processing speed, attention and working memory.
- Cognition: WRAT-4 Reading Subtest [ Time Frame: 6 months ]A measure of letter and word decoding,
- Emotional Health: Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptom Questionnaire [ Time Frame: 6 months ]A measure of the presence and severity of post-concussion somatic, cognitive, and emotional symptoms.
- Emotional Health: Brief Symptom Inventory 18 [ Time Frame: 6 months ]A measure of psychological distress and psychiatric disorders.
- Emotional Health: Satisfaction with Life Scale [ Time Frame: 6 months ]A measure of global cognitive judgments of one's life satisfaction.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03754114
|Contact: William Barsan, MDfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: William J Meurer, MDemail@example.com|
|United States, California|
|Stanford University Medical Center||Recruiting|
|Palo Alto, California, United States, 94305|
|Contact: Karen Hirsch|
|San Francisco General Hospital||Recruiting|
|San Francisco, California, United States, 94143|
|Contact: Claude Hemphill|
|United States, Massachusetts|
|UMASS Memorial Medical Center||Recruiting|
|Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655|
|Contact: Susanne Muehlschlegel|
|United States, Minnesota|
|Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States, 55101|
|Contact: Michael Brogan|
|United States, New York|
|Strong Memorial Hospital||Recruiting|
|Rochester, New York, United States, 14642|
|Contact: Christopher Zammit|
|United States, Ohio|
|University of Cincinnati Medical Center||Recruiting|
|Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219|
|Contact: Natalie Kreitzer|
|United States, Pennsylvania|
|Penn Presbyterian Medical Center||Recruiting|
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104|
|Contact: Danielle Sandsmark|
|UPMC Presbyterian Hospital||Recruiting|
|Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212|
|Contact: David Okonkwo, MD|
|United States, Texas|
|Memorial Hermann Hospital||Recruiting|
|Houston, Texas, United States, 77024|
|Contact: Ryan Kitigawa, MD|
|Ben Taub General Hospital||Recruiting|
|Houston, Texas, United States, 77030|
|Contact: Claudia Robertson, MD|
|United States, Washington|
|Harborview Medical Center||Recruiting|
|Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104|
|Contact: Randall Chesnut|
|United States, Wisconsin|
|Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226|
|Contact: Vijay Johnson|
|Principal Investigator:||Lori Shutter, MD||University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260|
|Principal Investigator:||Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, MD, PhD||University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104|
|Principal Investigator:||William Barsan, MD||University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109|
|Principal Investigator:||Sharon Yeatts, PhD||Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425|