Rehabilitation of Postural Abnormalities in Parkinson's Disease
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03741959|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified November 2018 by Nicola Smania, MD, Clinical Professor, Universita di Verona.
Recruitment status was: Active, not recruiting
First Posted : November 15, 2018
Last Update Posted : November 15, 2018
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Parkinson Disease||Procedure: Experimental group Procedure: Control group||Not Applicable|
This RCT with two parallel group will be conducted according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, the guidelines for Good Clinical Practice, and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT).
The target population will be patients with Parkinson Disease who attend to the Neurorehabilitation Unit (AOUI Verona) and the Unità Operativa Complessa (UOC) Neurology ward (AOUI Verona) where they will be assessed for eligibility.
Who satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomly allocated in one of two groups, the experimental group and control group. Each patient will undergo rehabilitation.
Before the start of the study authors designed the experimental and the control group protocols. Two physiotherapists, one for each group, carried out the rehabilitation procedures. Patients of both groups received 10 individual sessions (60 min/session, 2 sessions/week, five consecutive weeks). Treatments will be performed in the rehabilitative gym of the G.B. Rossi University Hospital Neurological Rehabilitation Unit.
For the statistical analysis, an intention to treat analysis will be used. Descriptive statistics included means, standard deviation and graphs. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to test data distribution. Parametric or non-parametric tests will be used for inferential statistics, accordingly. The T-Test for unpaired data (or the Mann-Whitney test) will be used for testing between-group differences at T0 and T1. For this purpose, the changes of the score (Δ) between T0-T1 will be computed. The T-Test for paired data (or Wilcoxon signed rank tests) will be used to compare within-group changes over time. The level of significance was set p<0.05. Software statistics SPSS 20.0 (IBM Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0, Armonk, NY, USA).
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||40 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||Parallel Assignment. Single-blind RCT with two parallel group|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
|Masking Description:||Outcome assessor will be blinded. Patients will be specifically asked not to discuss their treatment during assessments. Examiner will be requested to inform the research coordinator if he will discover to which group a patient belonged, and they will periodically be questioned by the coordinator about this.|
|Official Title:||Rehabilitation of Postural Abnormalities in Parkinson's Disease: a Single-blind, Randomised Controlled Trial|
|Actual Study Start Date :||January 1, 2018|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||June 1, 2018|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||November 30, 2018|
The experimental group will undergo three groups of exercises: 1) active self-correction exercises (20 minutes) defined as the best possible trunk alignment the patient can achieved in the three-dimensional planes; 2) passive and active trunk stabilization exercises (20 minutes) to improve trunk biomechanical constraint and to counteract the evolution of the misalignment; 3) functional tasks (20 minutes) defined as functional exercises to train the automatic response to maintain the best alignment through the broadest possible range of challenging activities (Romano2015).Training will consist of individualized treatment 60 mins/day, 2 days/week, for 5 consecutive weeks.
Procedure: Experimental group
Active self-correction exercises (20 minutes) to achieve the best possible trunk alignment the patient can achieve in the three-dimensional planes using visual, proprioceptive and EMG feedbacks.
Passive and active trunk stabilization exercises (20 minutes) to improve trunk biomechanical constraint Functional tasks (20 minutes) defined as functional exercises to train the automatic response to maintain the best alignment through the broadest possible range of challenging activities (Romano2015).
Active Comparator: Control
The control group will undergo strengthening exercises and gait training as the usual practice in Parkinson Disease. Training will consist of individualized treatment 60 mins/day, 2 days/week, for 5 consecutive weeks (Bartolo et. al., 2010).
Procedure: Control group
Training consisted of passive and active trunk mobilization (10 minutes) followed by muscle stretching, and strengthening exercises, and gait training (50 minutes)(Bartolo et. al., 2010).
- Changes in the degrees of trunk deviation in the sagittal and coronal plane. [ Time Frame: Pre-treatment, after 5 weeks, at 1 month-follow-up and 4-month follow-up ]Changes in the degree of trunk deviation in the sagittal and coronal plane will be assessed using a wall goniometer in standing position.
- Changes in Gait speed (cm/sec) [ Time Frame: Pre-treatment, after 5 weeks, at 1 month-follow-up and 4-month follow-up ]Changes in gait speed will be assessed using the Gait Rite System. It is a computerized walkway providing temporal spatial gait analysis.
- Changes in the Percentage Difference of Sway (PDS) [ Time Frame: Pre-treatment, after 5 weeks, at 1 month-follow-up and 4-month follow-up ]The PDS computed for sway velocity in the eyes open (eo) and eyes closed (ec) conditions. A ratio close to zero or negative indicates that the magnitude of body sway is similar or smaller in the ec than in the eo condition . On the contrary, positive values reflect a larger sway in the ec than in the eo condition.
- Changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) [ Time Frame: Pre-treatment, after 5 weeks, at 1 month-follow-up and 4-month follow-up ]
It is a comprehensive assessment designed to monitor the burden and the extent of Parkinson Disease across the longitudinal disease course and provides a clinical end-point in clinical trials. It consists of four sections with a total summed score. Each item have 5 response options (0=normal; 4=severe symptoms/signs). The higher= greater impact of PD symptoms.
The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - part III (UPDRS III) subscale will be used to measure changes in the motor disability (score range, 0-33; the higher=worse symptoms).
- Changes in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) [ Time Frame: Pre-treatment, after 5 weeks, at 1 month-follow-up and 4-month follow-up ]The PDQ-8 contains eight of the original 39 items of the PDQ-39; one item selected from each of the 8 scales (mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognitions, communications and bodily discomfort). It provides a reliable measure of overall health status and is ideal for studies in which a shorter questionnaire is preferred. Each question is scored from 0-4 points and the scores are summed. the summed scores are then divided by total possible score and given as a percentage score out of 100 (Score range, 32-100; the higher worse health status)
- The number of falls [ Time Frame: Pre-treatment, after 5 weeks, at 1 month-follow-up and 4-month follow-up ]Number of falls occured in the previous month.
- Changes in the Mini Balance Evaluation System test (Mini BESTest) [ Time Frame: Pre-treatment, after 5 weeks, at 1 month-follow-up and 4-month follow-up ]It is a clinical balance assessment tool to target and identify 4 different balance control systems (anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, dynamic gait) so that specific rehabilitation approaches can be designed. It is a 14-item test scored on a 3-level ordinal scale (0-2). Total score range 0-32; the higher= better performance.
- Changes in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) [ Time Frame: Pre-treatment, after 5 weeks, at 1 month-follow-up and 4-month follow-up ]A numeric rating scale to measure the amount of pain that a patient feels ranges across a continuum from none (0) to an extreme amount of pain (10). Total score range 0-10; the higher= worse performance.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03741959
|Verona, Italy, 37134|
|Study Chair:||Michele Tinazzi, PhD||Universita di Verona|