The Effects of "Three Good Things" Positive Psychotherapy on Nurses' Burnout
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03645798|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : August 24, 2018
Last Update Posted : August 24, 2018
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Burnout Syndrome Nurse's Role||Behavioral: "Three good things" therapy Behavioral: Normal psychological instruction||Not Applicable|
Study design and sample In the present study, we used a randomized, controlled design to assess the effect of "three good things" positive psychotherapy from August 2015 to January 2016. Measures were administered before (T0) and immediately after (T1) the intervention.
The study sample were nurses recruited from one three-level general hospital in Changsha, Hunan, China. The sample size calculation was conducted via PASS statistical software (NCSS LCC, East Kaysville, UT, USA) . The effect size was 0.67, power was 0.80, and margin of error type Ⅰ was 0.05. Accordingly, the sample size was 64. Stochastic tables' law was used for group division. A total of 193 nurses completed the MBI-GS, and 102 nurses who met the inclusion criteria were randomly selected for the study. However, only 73 completed the study, with 33 in the experimental group and 40 in the control group.
Instruments A socio-demographic questionnaire, the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS), the turnover intention questionnaire, the Job Performance scale, the Job Satisfaction scale, the General self-efficacy Scale, the CD-RISC and the Trait Coping Style Scale were used to collect the data. The blood cortisol was also collected. The detail instruction of these scales could be found at Outcome Measures section.
Ethical consideration This study was approval by The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University. Participants were informed about the objectives and procedures of the study before they began the survey. All data were held confidential. Only the research team could access the data.
Data analysis Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics was used to describe demographic data, burnout, turnover intention, job performance, job satisfaction, self-efficacy, resilience, coping style and cortisol. Generalized repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to demonstrate the effect of intervention and time-intervention interaction.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||73 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||A randomized, controlled trial was conducted for 73 nurses from The Second Xiangya Hospitcal of Central South University (33 in the experimental group, 40 in the control group). The experimental group received a Wechat-based six-month "three good things" positive psychotherapy from August 2015 to January 2016, while the control group only received normal psychological instruction from the hospital.|
|Official Title:||The Effects of "Three Good Things" Positive Psychotherapy on Burnout, Turnover Intention, Job Performance, Job Satisfaction, Self-efficacy, Coping Styles, Resilience and Blood Cortisol of Chinese Nurses|
|Actual Study Start Date :||July 1, 2015|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||January 31, 2016|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||January 31, 2016|
Experimental: "Three good things" therapy group
The experimental group received a six-month Wechat-based"three good things" positive psychotherapy from August 2015 to January 2016. Participants were directed to record three good things that went well each day. These things could be minor, ordinary, or important. Next to each good things, participants were required to answer the question:" Why did this good thing happen"?
Behavioral: "Three good things" therapy
To maintain an emphasis on the positive experience, participants were directed to record three good things that went well each day. These things could be minor, ordinary, or important. Next to each good thing, participants were required to answer the question: "Why did this good thing happen?"
Normal psychological instruction group
The control group only received normal psychological instruction from the hospital
Behavioral: Normal psychological instruction
Normal psychological instruction is a convenient method set by the hospital. Nurses who have stress or psychological problem could find help through this intervention. It was delivered by psychologists.
- The Maslach Burnout Inventory-General survey (MBI-GS) was used to assess the change of burnout from baseline to six months later. [ Time Frame: The MBI-GS was used to assess nurses' burnout prior to and immediately after the intervention. ]This scale was developed by Maslach and Jackson (1981) and consists of 16 items over three metrics: emotional exhaustion (EE, five items), cynicism (CY, five items) and reduced professional efficacy (RPE, six items). The items were scored on a Likert scale from 0 (never) to 6 (everyday) (Schaufeli et al. 1996). The higher the scores on the three metrics, the higher level of burnout indicated. The Chinese version of the MBI-GS, developed by Li & Shi (2003), also has a good validity and reliability. In this study, Cronbach alpha coefficients for EE, CY and RPE were 0.93, 0.83 and 0.82, respectively.
- The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) [ Time Frame: The CD-RISC was used to assess nurses' resilience prior to and immediately after the intervention. ]The CD-RISC was used to measure nurses' resilience level (Connor & Davidson 2003). This scale comprises 25 items over three metrics (tenacity, strength and optimism) that assess resilience or capacity to change and cope with adversity. Nurses were asked to rate each item with reference to the previous month. A 5-point Likert scale was used (0 = not true at all, 4 = true all the time.). The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of resilience. The Cronbach alpha coefficients of the Chinese version were 0.91 for the total score, 0.88, 0.80 and 0.60 for the three factors (Yu & Zhang 2007).
- The General Self-efficacy Scale [ Time Frame: The General Self-efficacy Scale was used to assess nurses' self-efficacy prior to and immediately after the intervention. ]Self-efficacy was defined as the average score on the General Self-efficacy Scale. The scale is a single-dimension scale with 10 questiona. Each question is assigned points from 1 to 4, and the final score is the total score of the 10 questions. The Chinese versison also has a good validity and reliability with a Cronbach alpha is 0.88.
- The Trait Coping Style Scale (TCSS) [ Time Frame: The TCSS was used to assess nurses' coping styles prior to and immediately after the intervention. ]The TCSS consists of 20 items over two metrics: positive coping style (PCS, 10 items) and negative coping style (NCS, 10 items). The items were scored on a five-point Likert scale from 1 to 5. The final scores of PCS and NCS were the total scores of their items. The Cronhach alpha coefficients of the two metrics were 0.70 and 0.69, respectively.
- The Turnover Intention Scale [ Time Frame: The Turnover Intention Scale was used to assess nurses' turnover intention prior to and immediately after the intervention. ]The Turnover Intention Scale was developed by Michaels and Spector (1982). The Chinese version was translated by Li and Li (2000). It includes three metrics ( the possibility to resign the job, the possibility to find another job and the possibility to get another job) and 6 items. A 4-Likert scale from 1 (never) to 4 (always) was used to score each item. The higher the score was, the stronger the turnover intention is.
- The Job Satisfaction Scale [ Time Frame: The Job Satisfaction Scale was used to assess nurses' job satisfaction prior to and immediately after the intervention. ]The Job Satisfaction Scale, developed by Tao et al. (2009), includes 38 items. A 5-Likert scale from 1 (totally agree) to 5 (totally disagree) were used to score each item. The total score of job satisfaction ranges from 38 to 190, with higher score indicating higher levels of job satisfaction. The Cronbach alpha was 0.783 in this study.
- The Job Performance Scale [ Time Frame: The Job Performance Scale was used to assess nurses' job performance prior to and immediately after the intervention. ]The Job Performance Scale consists 16 items and 3 metrics (job denotion, task performance and interpersonal promotion). A 6-Likert scale from 1 to 6 was used to score nurses' job performance. The final score of the three metrics were the total score of their items. The Cronbach alpha of the three metrics in this study were 0.842, 0.904 and 0.927, respectively.
- The blood cortisol [ Time Frame: The blood was used to assess nurses' cortisol level prior to and immediately after the intervention. ]The blood sample were collected on a day during the third to the tenth day of the menstrual cycle. Participants were instructed not to eat or drink anything other than water, and not to undertake any strenuous exercise 2 h or smoking 30 min before a blood sample was taken. Five trained researchers drew the blood samples between 7am-9am at an experimental lab. Nurses were instructed to take a blood sample at their convenient time. Blood was collected using vacuum blood collection tubes (Hubei Jin Xing Technology Co. Wuhan) and sent to an endocrinology laboratory for biochemical analysis at no cost to the participants (Endocrinology Laboratory, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Dr. Z.X. Gui). Blood samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 2 min in order to get a clear supernatant. Blood cortisol was measured using an immunoassay with chemiluminescence detection (ADVIA Centaur XP Immunoassay System, Siemens, Germany).
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03645798
|Central South University|
|Changsha, Hunan, China, 410013|
|Study Director:||Jingping Zhang||Cental South University|