Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Injection of Botulinum Toxin A vs Scopolamine Patches in the Treatment of Drooling in Children With Cerebral Palsy (TOXSIALO)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03616067|
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : August 6, 2018
Last Update Posted : August 6, 2018
Cerebral palsy is the first cause of motor disability in developed countries. It is associated with altered motor function but also with mental, sensorial and behavior deficiencies. Drooling frequently occurs in children with cerebral palsy (37 to 58%). It causes multiple medical and social complications which can all increase disability and reduce quality of life for the patients and their family. Drooling treatments are various and includes orofacial rehabilitations, anticholinergic medications, botulinum toxin A and B salivary gland injections. Surgeries could also be used, but their benefits are often outweighed by the risk.
- Orofacial rehabilitation is firstly recommended, even if few studies evaluated its efficacy.
- Medication by Scopoderm®, a cutaneous anticholinergic drug, is frequently used in spite of frequent side effects and a lack of evidence regarding efficacy.
- Botulinum toxin salivary gland injections (Botox®) were shown to be effective in reducing the severity of drooling consequences for the patient quality of life up to 12 months after the injections (Reid 2008).
A recent survey carried showed that treatment by Botox® injection would be preferred by professional to Scopoderm® patch, because of better tolerance and efficacy, even if Scopoderm® remained more used by professionals (Chaleat-Valayer 2016). However, a Cochrane review (Walshe 2012) concluded that there is 1) no strong consensus regarding assessment or the timing of all treatments 2) not enough efficacy studies with high level of evidence, 3) mostly efficacy studies vs placebo or no intervention 4) a lack of long term treatment assessment 5) a lack of studies on the patient quality of life.
Our study will be a comparative randomized clinical trial with an active control arm. The hypothesis is that therapeutic treatment of drooling in children with cerebral palsy consisting of a standardized rehabilitation treatment associated with a botulinum toxin A injection (Botox®) in the salivary glands is more effective than the same rehabilitation treatment associated with a treatment by scopolamine patches (Scopoderm®).
The main outcome will be assessed 15 months after initiation of treatment to evaluate long-term effectiveness. Patients from both arms of the trial will received rehabilitation, in order to compare treatment efficacy as it is done in real conditions of treatment. The efficacy of the treatment will be assessed on the impact of the drooling perceived by the patients and their family rather than on the measure of salivary production, as recommended (Walshe 2012).
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Cerebral Palsy||Drug: Botox® injection Drug: Scopoderm® patches arm||Phase 3|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||130 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Evaluation of the Long-term Efficacy of the Injection of Botulinum Toxin A Into the Salivary Glands Versus Scopolamine Patches in the Treatment of Drooling in Children Over 4 Years Old With Cerebral Palsy.|
|Estimated Study Start Date :||January 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||July 2022|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||July 2022|
Experimental: Botox® injection arm
Botox® injection in salivary glands will be performed one month after inclusion. It will be performed with one injection point per gland (parotids and submandibulars).
Drug: Botox® injection
Botox® injection in salivary glands will be performed one month after inclusion. It will be performed with one injection point per gland (parotids and submandibulars)
Active Comparator: Scopoderm® patches arm
Scopoderm® patches will be initiated one month after inclusion. The patches will be renewed every 3 days, alternating behind each ear
Drug: Scopoderm® patches arm
Scopoderm® patches will be initiated one month after inclusion. The patches will be renewed every 3 days, alternating behind each ear.
- Drooling Impact Scale (DIS scale) [ Time Frame: after 15 months of treatment ]The DIS scale is a questionnaire of 10 questions with a score of 100 points which will be completed by the patient's entourage (family and/or caregivers). This scale has a good validity and sensitivity to changes in the context of the evaluation of the drooling in children with CP, with a score difference of 10 points considered as clinical significant.
- DIS scale [ Time Frame: at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment ]The DIS scale is a questionnaire of 10 questions with a score of 100 points which will be completed by the patient's entourage (family and/or caregivers). This scale has a good validity and sensitivity to changes in the context of the evaluation of the drooling in children with CP, with a score difference of 10 points considered as clinical significant
- Drooling severity [ Time Frame: at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months of treatment ]average number of bibs used per day per patient
- Clinical complications of the drooling [ Time Frame: at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months of treatment ]The number of hospitalizations for pulmonary infections and the average number of prescriptions for antibiotic treatment linked to bronchial secondary infection.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03616067
|Contact: Karine POYAU, PhD||33 472 11 53 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Emmanuelle CHALEAT-VALAYER, MD||33 472 38 48 email@example.com|
|Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues||Not yet recruiting|
|Lyon, France, 69322|
|Contact: Emmanuelle CHALEAT-VALAYER firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator:||Sandrine TOUZET, MD||Hospices Civils de Lyon|