Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 2 of 13 for:    "Root Resorption"

A Comparative CT Evaluation of the Amount of Root Resorption in Self-ligating Versus Conventional Brackets

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03613285
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : August 3, 2018
Last Update Posted : August 3, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Rehana Bashir, Institute of Dental Science and Technologies

Brief Summary:
Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the extent of root resorption in the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth during orthodontic treatment with the use of different types of brackets. Materials and methods: The study consisted of 21 patients (11 males and 10 females) within the age group of 16-25 years, having bimaxillary protrusion. They were divided into three groups. In Group 1- Conventional brackets, Group 2- Self-ligation brackets:Smart Clip (Passive), and in Group 3 Self-ligation brackets: Empower (Active) were bonded. Computed Tomography scans and Orthopantomograms were taken before start of treatment and after six months of retraction. Root resorption is computed as the difference between the pre treatment total tooth length and the post treatment total tooth length.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Root Resorption Device: conventional brackets Device: smart clip passive self ligating brackets Device: Empower active self ligating brackets Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 21 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Comparative CT Evaluation of the Amount of Root Resorption in Self-ligating Versus Conventional Brackets
Actual Study Start Date : October 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date : November 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date : December 1, 2015

Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: conventional brackets
Conventional brackets with Mac Laughin bennette Trevisi (MBT) prescription
Device: conventional brackets
conventional brackets with MBT prescription was used for orthodontic treatment and root resorption was assessed.

Active Comparator: Smart clip passive self ligating brackets
Smart clip passive self ligating brackets with Mac Laughin bennette Trevisi (MBT) prescription
Device: smart clip passive self ligating brackets
smart clip passive self ligating brackets with MBT prescription was used for orthodontic treatment and root resorption was assessed.

Active Comparator: Empower active self ligating brackets
Empower active self ligating brackets with Mac Laughin bennette Trevisi (MBT) prescription
Device: Empower active self ligating brackets
Empower active self ligating brackets with MBT prescription was used for orthodontic treatment and root resorption was assessed.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. root resorption [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    Computed Tomography scans were taken before start of treatment and after six months of retraction.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   16 Years to 25 Years   (Child, Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients having complete root formation at start of treatment,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with skeletal or dental anomalies .
  • Patients having history of root resorption
  • Patients having any systemic or metabolic anomalies,
  • Patients with trauma of anterior teeth
  • Patients with periapical inflammation of the anterior teeth
  • Patients with impacted teeth
  • Patients with tumors and cysts in the examined area
  • Patients having undergone orthodontic treatment previously.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03613285


Locations
Layout table for location information
India
Institute of Dental Studies & Technologies
Ghāziābād, Uttar Pradesh, India, 201201
Sponsors and Collaborators
Institute of Dental Science and Technologies
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Chair: Puneet Batra, MDS IDST

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Rehana Bashir, Principal Investigator, Institute of Dental Science and Technologies
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03613285     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: IDST/ERBC/2013/09
First Posted: August 3, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: August 3, 2018
Last Verified: July 2018
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided
Plan Description: Will decide on case by case basis and as if our institution allows so

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Root Resorption
Tooth Resorption
Tooth Diseases
Stomatognathic Diseases