Coral Bone Graft Verses Xenograft With Immediate Implant in Maxillary Anterior Esthetic Zone
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03607864|
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : July 31, 2018
Last Update Posted : January 31, 2019
Autogenous bone graft is considered to be the golden standard for grafting as it has osteoconductive , osteoinductive and osteogenic functions , however it has the problems of donor site morbidity , the need for two surgeries as well as post operative swelling and discomfort of the patient , so alternative bone grafts as alloplast has been introduced.
Coral bone has a structure which is similar to that of cancellous bone , its mechanical properties is similar to that of bone and it consists of high content of calcium carbonate scaffolds that has the advantages of being biodegradable , biocompatible and osteoconductive , they act as a carrier for growth factors and allow cell attachment , growth , spreading , differentiation and has been found to be effective bone graft
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Badly Decayed Anterior Maxillary Teeth||Device: coral bone graft and xenograft||Not Applicable|
Show Detailed Description
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||18 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss After Immediate Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone With Coral Bone Versus Xenograft|
|Estimated Study Start Date :||January 30, 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||July 2019|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||September 2019|
Experimental: coral bone graft and xenograft
Extraction of upper anterior badly broken teeth with immediate implant placement with the use of coral bone and xenograft as grafting material between the implant and the labial socket bone
Device: coral bone graft and xenograft
ligible patients will be randomized in equal proportions between control group(immediate implant placement with grafting with xenograft) and study group (immediate implant placement with grafting with coral bone) Patients of both groups will be subjected to standard panoramic radiographs, cone beam ct .
Crestal bone level will measured by cone beam ct. Local anesthesia will be given to the patient. Only sulcular incision line with reflection is used A peritome will be used for a traumatic extraction of remaining roots. The extraction socket will be evaluated for absence of any fenestration or granulation tissues implant will be inserted in extraction socket bodily palatal with grafting with coral bone and xenograft The flap will then be copiously irrigated with saline in preparation for closure.
The flap will then be closed using interrupted 5/0 prolene sutures.
- crestal bone loss [ Time Frame: 4 month ]the amount of crestal bone loss will be measured using cone beam computed tomography
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03607864
|Contact: amro abdelal bahkiri, email@example.com|
|Contact: mohamed mounir, firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: mohamed mounir, phd 0201001505798 email@example.com|
|Contact: magdy zarea 0201144252034 firstname.lastname@example.org|