Evaluate F901318 Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients Lacking Treatment Options (FORMULA-OLS)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03583164|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : July 11, 2018
Last Update Posted : July 24, 2020
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Invasive Fungal Infections||Drug: F901318||Phase 2|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||100 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Phase IIb Study of F901318 as Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections Due to Lomentospora Prolificans, Scedosporium Spp., Aspergillus Spp., and Other Resistant Fungi in Patients Lacking Suitable Alternative Treatment Options|
|Actual Study Start Date :||June 6, 2018|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||December 2020|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||February 2021|
open-label single-arm of F901318 as treatment of invasive fungal infections due to Lomentospora prolificans, Scedosporium spp., Aspergillus spp., and other resistant fungi which are susceptible to F901318 in patients with limited treatment options.
30mg tablets with a maximum daily dose of 300mg with dose adjustments according to plasma levels of F901318 and concomitant treatment with CYP inducers or inhibitors
- DRC adjudicated overall response at Day 42 using a combination of clinical, mycological and radiological response [ Time Frame: Day 42 ]DRC adjudicated overall response at Day 42 using a combination of clinical, mycological using a combination of clinical, mycological and radiological results
- DRC adjudicated response at other time points, investigator assessed overall response, all cause mortality. [ Time Frame: Days 7, 14, 28, End Of Treatment (anytime during the study between first administration and Day 84), 84 and 4-week FU ]
Assessment of overall response will be based on all available assessments (clinical, radiological and mycological). See response assessments listed below.
Treatment "success" is defined as complete or partial.
Treatment "failure" is defined as stable response or progression of IFD. The criteria for assessment of overall response are summarised below:
Success -complete, Success -partial, Failure -stable, Failure -progression.
- Clinical response [ Time Frame: Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, Day 42, End Of Treatment (anytime during the study between first administration and Day 84), Day 84 and 4-week FU ]The Investigator will identify and assess clinical signs and symptoms related to the IFD reported for each patient. Response assessment will be based on changes from baseline signs and symptoms
- Where appropriate for the IFD, radiological response [ Time Frame: Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, Day 42, End Of Treatment (anytime during the study between first administration and Day 84), Day 84 and 4-week FU ]
As relevant for the IFD under study, baseline radiological assessments of IFD will be performed at screening and during the course of the study in accordance with local practice and as clinically indicated.
A ≥ 90% improvement.
A ≥ 50 to < 90% improvement.
A ≥ 25% to < 50% improvement.
No Change to < 25% improvement.
Worsening in aggregate (across all lesions if more than one lesion).
No signs on radiological images at screening.
Results not available (i.e. assessment not performed at scheduled time-point).
- Mycological response by pathogen [ Time Frame: Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, Day 42, End Of Treatment (anytime during the study between first administration and Day 84), Day 84 and 4-week FU ]
Assessment of mycological response as follows:
Eradication of original causative organism cultured or identified by histology/cytology at baseline and no emergence of new causative organisms.
Presumed eradication - missing documentation of eradication of causative organism and no evidence of new causative organisms + resolution of all or some clinical symptoms and physical findings of IFD.
Persistence of the original causative organism cultured or identified by histology/cytology at baseline or emergence of a new causative organism.
Presumed persistence - missing documentation of persistence of causative organism and no documentation of emergence of new causative organisms + either (i) no resolution or (ii) worsening of any clinical symptoms and physical findings of IFD.
No mycological Follow-up results available (no diagnostic test done at the scheduled time-point).
No mycological evidence at baseline (negative diagnostic test(s) or not done).
- Investigator-assessed overall response [ Time Frame: Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, Day 42, End Of Treatment (anytime during the study between first administration and Day 84), Day 84 and 4-week FU ](integration of clinical, radiological, and mycological response) see above.
- All-cause mortality [ Time Frame: Day 42, End Of Treatment (anytime during the study between first administration and Day 84), Day 84 and 4-week FU ]All-cause mortality will be assessed using survival status and, if applicable, death details will be recorded in the CRF
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03583164
|Contact: Paul Newell||44 07766 130849||PNewell@f2g.com|
|Principal Investigator:||Sharon Chen||Westmead Hospital|