Foot Orthotic for Early Stage Rheumatoid Arthritis
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03561688|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 19, 2018
Last Update Posted : March 3, 2020
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Rheumatoid Arthritis Rheumatoid Arthritis of Foot (Disorder)||Device: Foot orthotics Device: Standard insole||Not Applicable|
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune, chronic, progressive, systemic inflammatory disease leading to substantial pain, disability, and other morbidities. In Denmark there are 40.000 patients with RA. In RA, synovitis, effusion, eventually erosive arthritis, bone loss and weakening of the muscle and tendon apparatus are thought to cause clinically recognizable valgus heel or pes planovalgus deformity. These symptoms gradually cause irreversible joint deformities and changes in the locomotion of muscles3. Over 85% of patients with RA experience painful feet and ankles during the course of the disease. Despite medical developments, foot orthotics (FO) are still an important adjunct treatment and are often prescribed with the intention to stabilize and align the foot. This is due to a number of reasons: 1) persistent foot and ankle problems still occuring even after clinical remission is reached. 2) patients with increased disease activity may have mechanical foot impairments that need treatment in conjunction with systemic management. and 3) patients, who have not responded to or are ineligible for biologic agents, continue to have active foot impairments. However, the scientific research literature within FO treatment has lagged behind clinical practice, often leading the clinician to recommend interventions based on opinion and past experience rather than published evidence9.
Production of FO is an enormous industry. Consequently, there is a great variety of products with different materials, design, manufacturing techniques and procedures. In the literature, some FO have been shown to reduce pain however there is a considerable amount for which the studies are either inconclusive or refute the effect of FO. This might be due to differences in methodology, sparse description of the orthotics and limited information on patient's disease type and stage. However, multidisciplinary studies are still limited and it is, therefore, too early to come up with guidelines about how these interventions affect the human body mechanically from current knowledge. Previous studies have primarily focused on how foot orthotics affect pain, foot function, walking speed, forefoot plantar pressure and gait parameters, while not considering the mechanical principles on which the rationales for FO were originally based. This has led to an abundance of clinical trials that are challenging to interpret, as FO clinical outcomes and FO gait mechanics have not been studied together.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||27 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Crossover Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||The study design is a cross over study. Patients is instructed in using a placebo FO for one month and receive a custom-made FO, which they will be using for one month.|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Primary Purpose:||Supportive Care|
|Official Title:||Foot Orthotic for Early Stage Rheumatoid Arthritis|
|Actual Study Start Date :||October 10, 2018|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||November 1, 2019|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||December 1, 2019|
Sham Comparator: Standard insole
a flat insole
Device: Standard insole
Sham foot orthotic
Experimental: Foot orthotics
Custom-made foot orthoses
Device: Foot orthotics
Insoles for shoes
- Change in gait mechanics [ Time Frame: Week 4 and 8 ]
Gait analysis will be performed using a 3D marker-based motion capture system from Qualisys, Sweden.
To investigate gait mechanics, detailed patient-specific musculoskeletal (MS) computer models will be created based on clinical medical images (MRI), anthropometrics and motion capture data. The models will be created utilizing a musculoskeletal computer modeling software AnyBody Modeling System (AMS). A detailed cadaver-based model The Twente Lower Extremity Model 2.0 (TLEM 2.0) is developed for AMS to obtain patient-specific architecture, scale bones, joints, and muscles attachments relative to the patient in combination with image-based morphing techniques. These models will be used to estimate joint angles, joint torques, muscle forces and joint forces of the ankle, knee and hip joint.
- Change in foot pressure distribution [ Time Frame: Week 4 and 8 ]
A pressure insole (2-3 mm thick) system (PedarX, Novel) will be placed in the patient's shoe attached to a small computer. It is a commercial available system that can measure accurate and reliable pressure distribution for monitoring local loads between the foot and the FO.
- Questionnaire - Pain - Visual analog scale [ Time Frame: Week 0, 4 and 8 ]0-10 scale from no pain to highest possible.
- Insole wearing time [ Time Frame: From week 4 to 8 ]Measured by temperature sensor (Orthotimer). Orthotimer is an electronic microsensor that documents the wearing time of orthopaedic devices. It is small and flat thermometer, (9 x 1 x 4.5 mm) and will be integrated in the handed-out FO. The sensor stores time, date and temperature every 15 minutes. This information allow for accurate measurements of how often the patients uses the FO.
- Pain - Pressure pain threshold [ Time Frame: Week 0, 4 and 8 ]To investigate pressure pain threshold (PPT) a handheld algometer will be used. An algometer is an instrument used to measure the pain threshold in relevant areas of the leg, foot and arm. The pain threshold is defined as the point where the pressure is experienced as pain. The pressure increases gradually with an interval until the pain is experienced and the patient presses a stop button. Each measurement is repeated 3 times in each session.
- Pain mapping [ Time Frame: Week 0, 4 and 8 ]Subjects will be asked to draw their perceived pain on pain mapping drawings. Drawings will be scanned and layered and averaged though MATLAB, version 2017B (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA). The area of Pain will be measured using ImangeJ v.1.8.0_112 (National Institutes of Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA).
- Wearable activity monitor [ Time Frame: From week 0 to week 8 ]A commercial available accelerometer based activity monitor (Polar M200) will be lent to the participants. The device will be used to monitor the participant's activity. Participants will be instructed to use the device during the two months they are involved in the project, during the placebo period and during FO treatment.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03561688
|Aalborg University Hospital|
|Aalborg, Denmark, 9000|
|King Christian X's Hospital for Rhuematic Diseases|
|Gråsten, Denmark, 6300|
|Department for Rheumatology|
|Hjørring, Denmark, 9800|
|Principal Investigator:||Morten B Simonsen, MSc||Aalborg University, Department of Health Science and Technology and Centre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Aalborg University|