Efficacy of Physiotherapy in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders. (MT-ATM)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03555201|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 13, 2018
Last Update Posted : October 9, 2019
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a manual therapy protocol composed of articulatory and myofascial techniques in patients with temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD).
Methods: Randomized and controlled clinical study of patients presenting TMD. The subjects will be divided into 2 groups: 1) manual therapy group; 2) control group. There will be 4 treatment sessions during 4 weeks, with evaluations before and after the study, which include: severity of dysfunction (Helkimo Index), quality of life (Short Form 36 Health Survey), pressure pain threshold (algometer) ), cervical mobility (goniometer), mouth opening (caliper), pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale) and cervical disability (Neck Disability Index).
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Temporomandibular Dysfunction (TMD)||Other: Manual therapy Other: Regular treatment control.||Not Applicable|
Introduction. Temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) is the set of clinical manifestations that affect this joint, the masticatory muscles and the structures associated with and involved in TMJ movements. This dysfunction represents a subclassification of musculoskeletal disorders, and presents with different symptoms and signs that include pain in the jaw joint or in the tissues that surround it, generalized myofascial pain, crackling or crackling joint noise associated with the movement, decrease in joint range, functional limitation, and deviation to the opening of the jaw.
Objective. The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of a myofascial soft tissue treatment versus a control group in people diagnosed with TMD of myofascial origin.
Material and methods
Sample. Subjects with dagnosis of TMD according to the diagnostic criteria for the investigation of temporomandibular disorders.
Study design. Randomized clinical trial with 2 groups: Group 1. Manual therapy protocol of SOFT TISSUES; Group 2. Regular treatment control.
Evaluations. Clinical interview with anthropometric data and characteristics of the pathology.
There will be 3 evaluations: at the beginning of the study, at the end of the treatment (at 4 weeks) and at 8 weeks as part of the follow-up period.
In addition, it includes the following evaluation instruments:
- Visual Analog Scale (EVA)
- Algometry of the masseter, temporal and ECOM muscles.
- Oral opening range.
- Range of cervical joint movement.
- Quality of life questionnaire related to oral health OHIP-14.
- Quality of life questionnaire SF-36.
- Index of clinical dysfunction of Helkimo.
- Cervical disability index.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||30 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Double (Participant, Investigator)|
|Official Title:||Efficacy of a Physiotherapy Protocol Based on Manual Therapy in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders.|
|Actual Study Start Date :||May 31, 2018|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||July 31, 2018|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||August 15, 2018|
Experimental: Manual therapy
Protocol of soft tissue techniques
Other: Regular treatment control.
Regular treatment control.
Active Comparator: Regular treatment control.
Regular treatment control.
Other: Manual therapy
protocol of soft tissues techniques
- Intensity of pain [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]Pain intensity scale. This scale consists of a horizontal line of 100 mm, delimited at one end by 0 mm (no pain) and at the other end by 100 mm (worst pain imaginable). This scale has shown a high validity and reliability for the assessment of the pain intensity of the patient
- Severity and degree of dysfunction [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]Helkimo Index. This index is based on the evaluation of five clinical signs: 1. Alteration of the range of movement by measuring the amplitude of the movements of the jaw: opening, lateralisation and protrusion of the jaw; 2. Alteration of the TMJ function (appearance of sounds in the joint during the vertical opening of the mouth, and mandibular trajectory pattern); 3. Muscle pain; 4. Pain upon palpation of the TMJ; 5. Pain during the movement of the jaw38. Each item evaluated is scored with values of 0, 1 or 5, with the sum of the scores of the clinical signs evaluated, the one referring to describing the severity and the group for each patient with TMD41. If the score obtained is 0, patients are included in group 0 (absence of symptoms). Scores from 1 to 4, group 1 (mild dysfunction). Scores from 5 to 9, group 2 (moderate dysfunction). And finally, if the score is from 10 to 25, the patients belong to group 3 (severe dysfunction).
- Health status [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]Quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36v2 is composed of 36 items with Likert type response options, which are included in 8 dimensions: Physical Function (FF, 10 items), Physical Role (RF, 4 items), Body Pain (DC, 2 items) , General Health (SG, 6 items), Vitality (VT, 4 items), Social Function (FS, 2 items), Emotional Role (SR, 3 items) and Mental Health (SM, 5 items). The scores range from 0 to 100 in each dimension, with the highest scores associated with a better state of health. This questionnaire has demonstrated a high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha value of more than 0.70, and an adequate reliability (ICC = 0.73-0'86).
- Cervical disability [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]Cervical disability questionnaire (NDI). It is a self-completed questionnaire formed by 10 sections: cervical pain intensity, personal care, weight lifting, reading, headache, concentration ability, work capacity, driving, sleep and leisure activities. The scores for each section range from 0 to 5, being 0 (without disability) and 5 (total disability). If a score ranges from 0 to 4, the patient would not have cervical disability. Scores from 5 to 14 (mild disability), from 15 to 24 (moderate disability), from 25 to 34 (severe disability) and from 35 to 50 (complete disability). Therefore, the maximum score that can be reached in this questionnaire is 509.45. The test-retest reliability has been shown to be optimal with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.978, and a high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.937.
- Opening range of the mouth [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]Vernier caliper. To measure the active opening of the mouth without pain a vernier caliper will be used (Vernier Caliper). To do this, patients remain in a sitting position and are asked to perform a maximum opening of the mouth without pain. The distance between the upper and lower central incisors of the mandible is measured, using the millimeters as the unit of measurement. 3 consecutive measurements are made with rest intervals of 30 seconds. The final measurement is obtained based on the average of the 3 results belonging to the previous measurements. This procedure has shown high intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0'9-0'98).
- Pressure pain threshold [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]Algometer. To assess the pain threshold at the pressure of the masseter, temporal and ECOM muscles, a mechanical pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments FDK 20) will be used. The pressure pain threshold is the minimum pressure that is needed to cause pain or discomfort at a certain point. In obtaining the result, the average of the 3 scores obtained from each point was made. The reliability of this procedure is high in healthy subjects [BCI = 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.97)] 28.31. In patients with TMD, reliability is moderate (ICC = 0.64)
- Cervical mobility [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]Goniometer. The range of joint movement of the neck is measured by the use of a goniometer. Flexion, extension, lateral tilt and cervical rotation are assessed. To be able to perform the measurement, the patient is asked to remain in a sitting position keeping his back at 90 degrees and his head in a neutral position. The physiotherapist instructs the patients to perform the previously explained movements, until reaching the maximum range of movement or in the presence of pain. We proceed to evaluate mobility in the 3 planes: sagittal plane, frontal plane and transverse plane. 3 measurements of each movement are made, and the final measurement obtained is the average of each previous result.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03555201
|Faculty of Physiotherapy|
|Valencia, Spain, 46010|