Working...
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

IN Ketamine vs IN Midazolam and Fentanyl for Laceration Repair

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03528512
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : May 18, 2018
Last Update Posted : January 23, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Kelly Levasseur, DO, William Beaumont Hospitals

Brief Summary:
Often, repair of the cuts (laceration repair) proves to be traumatic for the children and the parents. Nasal spray (Intranasal/IN) approaches for procedural pain reduction, such as during dental work, have been demonstrated to make drug administration painless and well tolerated. We are comparing IN ketamine to IN midazolam and fentanyl for pain and reducing anxiety during repair of cuts in children.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Laceration of Skin Drug: Ketamine Drug: Midazolam and fentanyl Phase 4

Detailed Description:

Children frequently present to pediatric emergency center (PEC) with cuts of different body parts. Often, repair of the cuts (laceration repair) proves to be traumatic for the children and the parents alike. Ideally, repair of the cuts should be as painless and free from anxiety as possible. To work towards this goal, different analgesic (pain drugs) and sedative ( to calm patients down) management strategies use intravenous (into the vein), intramuscular ( into the muscle) and, more recently, intranasal (into the nostrils) routes. Unfortunately, intravenous access is hard to establish and may be painful for the child. The intramuscular route is often similarly painful. Due to the rich blood supply and large surface area of the nasal vestibule, intranasally (IN) administered medications are highly absorbed. IN approaches for procedural pain reduction, such as during dental work, have been demonstrated to make drug administration painless and well tolerated, making it an attractive potential alternative to commonly used intravenous and intramuscular approaches. In several small research studies, high doses of intranasal ketamine (9 mg/kg) produce adequate sedation during laceration repair with minimal side effects. A recent study compared IN ketamine, midazolam, fentanyl or combination of these drugs for pain management and urgent analgesia sedation, and demonstrated that they are effective and safe, reporting that ~60% of study participants sustained mild to moderate sedation. Unfortunately, there are not enough studies done to evaluate the sedation effect of IN ketamine for laceration repair. Small studies (Tsze and Nemeth) showed that IN ketamine is an effective alternative but no studies are done to compare combination IN midazolam and fentanyl to IN ketamine. Our null hypothesis is that there is no difference in sedation scores during laceration repair when comparing the use of IN ketamine to IN midazolam and IN fentanyl.

We will recruit a total of 30 pediatric patients (6 months - 10 y age) in a randomized double-blinded pilot study of IN ketamine alone or combined IN midazolam and IN fentanyl for laceration repair, comparing levels of pain and sedation scores using validated pediatric metrics as the primary outcomes. In addition, we will assess comparative nurse and physician satisfaction in each of these two groups. Understanding the relative effectiveness of these two approaches will help us identify a safe, effective, and easily administrable method to manage pain and anxiety, thereby, improving patient experience and outcomes during the often traumatic laceration repair procedure.


Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 30 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description: Randomized double blinded control trial
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description: A randomization list created by an online randomization tool will be used to assign participants to a treatment arm (in random blocks of 4, 6, and 8). As participants are enrolled in the study, they will be assigned to the next available sequential treatment arm.
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Comparison of Sedation, Pain, and Care Provider Satisfaction Between the Use of Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intranasal Midazolam and Fentanyl During Laceration Repair
Actual Study Start Date : September 4, 2018
Estimated Primary Completion Date : June 15, 2019
Estimated Study Completion Date : September 15, 2019

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Tears

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: IN ketamine
Intranasal ketamine 3mg/kg (max 100 mg) + saline 0.03 ml/kg (max 2ml)
Drug: Ketamine
Intranasal ketamine 3mg/kg (max 100 mg) + saline 0.03 ml/kg (max 2ml)

Active Comparator: IN midazolam and fentanyl
Intranasal midazolam 0.3 mg/kg (max 10 mg) + fentanyl 1.5mcg/kg (max 100 mcg)
Drug: Midazolam and fentanyl
Intranasal midazolam 0.3 mg/kg (max 10 mg) + fentanyl 1.5mcg/kg (max 100 mcg)




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Sedation Score [ Time Frame: up to 30 minutes ]
    The primary outcome variable is the maximum sedation score as measured by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale. This scale consists of an ordinal scale from 0 being awake and alert and 4 being unarousable. Medians will be calculated for each group.

  2. Proportion of children with maximum sedation score [ Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes ]
    The proportion of children who receive a maximum sedation score of either 1 or 2 (without distinguishing between those values)


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Pain scores during laceration repair [ Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes ]
    The effect of IN ketamine vs IN midazolam + IN fentanyl on pain scores during laceration repair using either Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale or Faces Scale pain scale depending for patient age, each a Likert scale from 0 being no pain to 10 being worst pain, median scores for each group

  2. Nurse and physician satisfaction [ Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes ]
    Nurse and physician satisfaction will be assessed by a survey which will be filled in the end of the sedation. Response to overall experience question score on Likert scale where 1 is poor and 5 is Excellent. Proportion of responders giving answers of 4 or 5 will be calculated.

  3. Rates of failure [ Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes ]
    Rates of failure to repair laceration due to agitation or intolerable pain with the switch to intravenous medications will be compared between two groups. Percentage failure will be reported.

  4. Change in vitals [ Time Frame: up to 30 minutes ]
    Proportion of children who have any significant change in vitals during analgosedation (any desaturation - Oxygen saturation < 90, and hypotension per age-related norms) will be compared between the two groups.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   6 Months to 10 Years   (Child)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients 6 months to 10 years who required laceration repair in the pediatric emergency center.
  • Laceration should be less than 5 cm long, require 2 or more sutures and no consult subspeciality consult for repair.
  • Topical anesthetic (lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine topical solution/XAP) will be applied to all lacerations for 20 minutes duration before giving the intranasal medications.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 6 months
  • Documented allergy or adverse effect to ketamine, midazolam or fentanyl
  • Epistaxis
  • Partial upper airway obstruction
  • Oxygen requirement via nasal cannula
  • Acute mental status changes (e.g. obtunded or somnolent)
  • Documented increased intracranial pressure or increased ocular pressure
  • Documented porphyria
  • Previously involved in the study
  • Parent or patient refusal
  • Acutely compromised vitals (hypotension, desaturations, respiratory distress)
  • Any known heart disease
  • If any previous opioid use for analgesia during the visit
  • Need for staples
  • Scalp wounds
  • General trauma requiring additional sedation
  • Patients who received pain medications (acetaminophen or ibuprofen) before laceration repair

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03528512


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Ali Ozcan, MD 7187758031 ali.ozcan@beaumont.org
Contact: Mara Branoff, RN 2488981792 mara.branoff@beaumont.org

Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Michigan
Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak Recruiting
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
Sponsors and Collaborators
William Beaumont Hospitals
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Kelly Levasseur, DO William Beaumont Hospitals

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Kelly Levasseur, DO, Director of Pediatric Emergency Department, William Beaumont Hospitals
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03528512     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 2017-363
First Posted: May 18, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: January 23, 2019
Last Verified: January 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided
Plan Description: Undecided

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: Yes

Keywords provided by Kelly Levasseur, DO, William Beaumont Hospitals:
Pediatric
analgesia
pain control
sedation
intranasal ketamine
intranasal midazolam
intranasal fentanyl

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Lacerations
Wounds and Injuries
Ketamine
Fentanyl
Midazolam
Analgesics
Sensory System Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Anesthetics, Dissociative
Anesthetics, Intravenous
Anesthetics, General
Anesthetics
Central Nervous System Depressants
Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists
Excitatory Amino Acid Agents
Neurotransmitter Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Analgesics, Opioid
Narcotics
Adjuvants, Anesthesia
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Anti-Anxiety Agents
Tranquilizing Agents
Psychotropic Drugs
GABA Modulators
GABA Agents