Remote Training in Evidence-based Practices for Clinicians Who Work With Migrant Workers
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03515226|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : May 3, 2018
Last Update Posted : October 12, 2018
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Depression||Behavioral: ITS based training Behavioral: Traditional Training||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||34 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||Randomized clinical trial|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Primary Purpose:||Health Services Research|
|Official Title:||Remote Training in Evidence-based Practices for Clinicians Who Work With Migrant Workers|
|Actual Study Start Date :||June 30, 2018|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||June 30, 2020|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||August 30, 2020|
Active Comparator: Traditional Training
24 hours of didactic and simulated case role play training in CBT principles, depression assessment and cultural competency.
Behavioral: Traditional Training
Training using didactics and role plays
Experimental: ITS based training
Traditional training plus the addition of an algorithmic based training computer program that trains clinicians in clinical micro-competencies.
Behavioral: ITS based training
Training using computerized adaptive training in addition to role play
- Learnability [ Time Frame: difference in number of hours in training between training interventions after 8 weeks of training. ]number of hours of training to reach competency using the CBTAS, a 20 item scale to assess clinician competency in CBT
- Skill drift [ Time Frame: group difference in hours of feedback clinicians receive over a six month period after being certified in CBT. ]number of hours in corrective feedback based on the CBTAS, a 20 item scale that assesses clinician competency in CBT
- Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) [ Time Frame: This measure will be administered to participants in each training group after they complete the 25 hours of training. ]This is a four item measure of intervention acceptability, where each item is rated on a 1-5 scale, with 1 = not at all acceptable and 5 = very acceptable. each group will be compared on the degree they find the training they participated in acceptable after they complete training.
- User Burden Scale [ Time Frame: administered once after 24-hours of training ]The User Burden Scale is a 20-item scale that assesses six domains of user burden: use, physical burden, time/social burdens, mental/emotional burden, privacy concerns and financial burdens. The scale is calculated item measure of perceived burden of use that covers 6 domains: difficulty of use, emotional burden, physical burden, time and social burden, financial burden and privacy. Each item is rated on a 04- scale, with a maximum score of 80 (high burden) and minimum score of 0 (low burden). We will compare the ratings of educational burden between groups to determine if the new training model is considered less burdensome than the traditional training model.
- System Usability Scale [ Time Frame: This scale will be administered to participants one time after they have participated in the training programs. once after 24-hours of training ]This is a 10-item scale with each item ranked on a five point system of low to high usability. The scale score is calculated by adding the item scores and multiplying by 2.5. A score of 68 or better is considered to be above average usablilty. As score less than 68 s considered to be poor usability. In this study, a score of 80 or more is considered our cut off for high usability. We will compare the two training programs on usability with this scale measure of the usability of a tool, and is consider the industry standard for measuring usability in the UCD field.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03515226
|Contact: Patricia Arean, PhDemail@example.com|
|Contact: Brenna Renn, PhDfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|United States, Washington|
|University of Washington Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences||Recruiting|
|Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105|
|Contact: Kathy Ringwood, MSW 206-221-8568 email@example.com|
|Contact: Patricia Arean, PhD 206.221.8692 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator:||Patricia Arean||UWMC Psychiatry|
|Study Director:||Brenna Renn, PhD||UWMC Psychiatry|