Factors Predicting Ineffective Contraception Use
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03500978|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : April 17, 2018
Last Update Posted : April 17, 2018
Unintended pregnancy (UP), defined as a mistimed or unwanted pregnancy, is a significant and prevalent public health problem, particularly among low-income women. Over half of all pregnancies are reportedly unintended and UP has been linked to adverse health outcomes in mothers and their children. Correct and consistent use of effective contraception is the primary method to prevent UP. Research has shown that low self-esteem and elevated depressive symptoms increase women's risk for ineffective contraception use and, by extension, for UP. This project examines the feasibility and possible efficacy of reducing ineffective contraception using an intervention that addresses depressive symptoms and self concept among young, low-income, predominantly minority women at risk for UP. Traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective in reducing depressive symptoms and improving self concept; but limited utilization, poor response, and low adherence to CBT is common among low-income and minority women. A more acceptable method for delivering CBT is needed for the target population. This project will use peer-specialists to deliver a CBT-based intervention to women at risk for UP. Because peer specialists are drawn from the same community as the target population and share some similar life experiences, the intervention may be more acceptable and effective than one offered by trained professionals.
This project will examine the effectiveness of a 9 week (8-session) peer-specialist led CBT-based intervention compared to an observational control condition to reduce depressive symptoms, improve self-esteem, and improve consistent contraceptive use to prevent UP. The weekly intervention sessions are delivered by telephone by a trained peer specialist. The study will evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention to improve consistent contraceptive use (primary outcome) and decrease depressive symptoms and increase self-esteem (secondary outcomes).
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Contraception Behavior||Behavioral: Peer CBT Intervention||Not Applicable|
This is a randomized controlled trial with one intervention group (peer-specialist led telephone-based CBT) and an observation only control group. There will be 3 measurement periods: baseline (pre-intervention), 10-week follow-up (post-intervention) and 14-week follow up. There is also a 4-week, mid-intervention assessment of outcomes designed to assess if there is a worsening of symptoms that needs to be addressed (e.g. referral for spike in depression or emergence of suicidal intent). This midterm evaluation also allows us to monitor the well-being of the control group, which has significantly less contact with project staff than the intervention group.
We will recruit 132 sexually active women from health care clinics (e.g., family planning, OB/GYN), with the aim of retaining at least 92 (46 per condition). Interested women will be consented and screened for eligibility in a private area of the clinics. They will be contacted by phone after consent to complete a structured, baseline questionnaire. After the baseline questionnaire, women will be randomly allocated to study conditions. Women will be randomized based on the randomization schedule established by the project biostatistician. Women allocated to the CBT intervention group will be mailed an intervention workbook and have their first telephone-based intervention session scheduled. The CBT intervention group will receive 8 telephone-based CBT intervention sessions (over 9 weeks) delivered by peer specialists. Each session will last up to 30 minutes. The control group will be an observation only control group (CTL group). They will not receive any intervention. The post-intervention and 1-month follow up questionnaires will also be collected via structured telephone interviews. Research staff who are collecting data will be blinded to study condition.
In addition to monitoring for worsening of psychological symptoms, procedures are in place for referring participants with worrisome increases in depression (i.e., >14 on the PHQ9) or suicidal intent to relevant mental health resources, including hospital emergency rooms and suicide hotlines for persons expressing suicidal intent. Further, the DSMB will be alerted so that they can monitor whether one condition appears to have an unusually high increase in symptoms, which might warrant stopping the trial for safety reasons. In addition, the researchers collecting data and the peer-specialists implementing the intervention will be engaged in weekly supervision with a clinical psychologist and have access to the study PI at all times. The project biostatistician will conduct all intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses using appropriate modern statistical approaches.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||92 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||Two group (behavioral intervention vs. no treatment) randomized trial with a pre-intervention and 10- and 14-week post-intervention assessment phases.|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
|Masking Description:||Randomization occurs after the baseline assessment, so the assessor is blinded to study condition. Follow-up assessments of outcome are completed by study personnel who are blinded to intervention (i.e., they had no part in the intervention and no access to the randomization schedule). An electronic research management system (RedCAP) is used to deliver the random assignments to the interventionist digitally after baseline is completed. None of the data collection or intervention staff have access to the database underlying the random assignment in RedCAP. The randomization schedule was established by the biostatistician, who has no role in the data collection or intervention delivery.|
|Official Title:||Factors Predicting Ineffective Contraception Use|
|Actual Study Start Date :||March 19, 2018|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||May 31, 2019|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||May 31, 2019|
Experimental: Peer CBT Intervention
Women allocated to the peer-specialist delivered CBT intervention group will be mailed an intervention workbook (CBT exercises) and have their first telephone-based intervention session scheduled. The CBT intervention group will receive 8 telephone-based CBT intervention sessions (over 9 weeks) delivered by peer specialists. Each session will last up to 30 minutes.
Behavioral: Peer CBT Intervention
Peer specialist delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy intervention over the phone.
No Intervention: Control
Women allocated to the observation-only control group will not receive any intervention.
- Consistent contraception use at 14-week follow-up [ Time Frame: 14-week follow-up ]Categorical (yes/no). Self report of using birth control consistently in prior month with a male sexual partner.
- Change in mean level of depressive symptoms from baseline to 10-week follow-up [ Time Frame: at 10-week follow-up ]9-item PHQ-9 Depressive Symptoms Scale. Self-report measure of depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. Each item is scored 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Higher scores indicated greater depressive symptoms. The maximum score is 27. Symptom scores can be categorized by levels: 5-9 = minimal; 10-14 = mild; 15-19 moderately severed; 20+ = severe.
- Change in mean level of self esteem from baseline to 10-week follow-up [ Time Frame: at 10-week follow-up ]20-item State Self Esteem Scale. Self-report measure of state (current) self esteem, includes 3 subscales (performance, appearance, and social). Each item is scored 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). Items are coded such that higher scores indicated higher self esteem. A mean scale score is calculated, ranging from 1 to 5.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03500978
|Contact: Melissa Godfrey, MPHfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|United States, Pennsylvania|
|Temple University School of Medicine OB/GYN||Recruiting|
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19122|
|Contact: Sarmina Hassan, MBBS, PHD 215-707-7278 email@example.com|
|Principal Investigator:||Stephen Lepore, PHD||Temple University|