Comparison of Mindfulness Meditation Tools For College Students
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03402009|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified September 2019 by Blair Johnson, University of Connecticut.
Recruitment status was: Active, not recruiting
First Posted : January 17, 2018
Last Update Posted : September 26, 2019
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Stress Anxiety||Behavioral: Apps Behavioral: EEG neurofeedback||Not Applicable|
Investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate strategies for assisting students develop a personal meditation practice. All participants will attend a mindfulness orientation, then begin the four-week intervention. During the intervention period, the treatment group will practice EEG-neurofeedback-assisted meditation using the Muse device (Interaxon) at least eight times over the four-week intervention period, and also practice mindfulness meditation on their own using their choice of tools (e.g., apps, weblinks, breath). The active control group will mirror the treatment group but will not have access to the EEG-neurofeedback device.
After a sufficient number of students register for the study who meet eligibility requirements, they will be provided with an option to enroll online in the first wave of the study, if their schedule allows, or be placed on a waitlist. Subsequent waves will take place throughout the semester(s) to accommodate additional participants. Enrolled participants will be asked to complete the pre-workshop questionnaire packet online, and attend an orientation session. During the orientation session, participants will first sign a consent form, provide a baseline saliva sample, then learn the basic technique of mindfulness meditation with an experienced meditation instructor. The orientation will also briefly explain the potential benefits of meditation from a scientific perspective, and emphasize the importance of establishing a daily practice, with the mindset that even one minute counts. Participants will then be asked to meditate for 3 minutes wearing the EEG device in order to get a baseline EEG reading. Following the orientation workshop, participants will be randomly assigned and notified via email into either the active control or treatment group along with group-specific instructions, and the 4-week intervention period will commence. Upon completion of the 4-week intervention, participants will be asked to complete post-intervention questionnaires online, then provide post-test measures of saliva, EEG reading during a 3 minute meditation. Participants will be debriefed, and those in the active control group will be given the option to use the EEG-neurofeedback. Follow-up surveys will be emailed to participants at 3, 6 and 12 months to examine if participants continue their meditation practice.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||140 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||Assisting University Students Self-Manage Stress: Comparison of Mindfulness Meditation Tools|
|Actual Study Start Date :||March 5, 2018|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||December 5, 2018|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 31, 2019|
independent meditation using web-based tools, apps, and EEG neurofeedback
Apps and weblinks to coach self-guided meditation.
Behavioral: EEG neurofeedback
Device provides feedback based on EEG readings.
Active Comparator: Active Control
independent meditation using web-based tools and apps
Apps and weblinks to coach self-guided meditation.
- Change in Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales-21 [ Time Frame: 5 weeks ](DASS-21; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995): an abbreviated, 21-item, Likert-style scale to assess levels of distress on three subscales: depression, anxiety and stress, based on how one felt over the past week. The DASS-21 has been used in prior studies assessing the benefits of mindfulness in undergraduate students (Gallego et al., 2014). It consists of 21 items with seven items per subscale, scored on a four-point scale ranging from 0 = did not apply to me at all to 3 = applied to me very much or most of the time. The total score sums all items. Higher scores indicate higher levels of distress.
- Big Five personality [ Time Frame: Baseline and 5 weeks ]Big Five personality traits (Costa & McCrae, 1992), which are openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. These factors have been used to understand the relationship between personality and various academic behaviors. Respondents rate each item on a five-point scale from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." This scale been used extensively in psychology research and has demonstrated good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity (Costa & McCrae, 1992).
- Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [ Time Frame: Baseline and 5 weeks ]Sleep quality will be assessed using the The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) (Buysse et al, 1989), a commonly used, validated and reliable measure of sleep quality.
- Self-Regulation of Eating Scale [ Time Frame: Baseline and 5 weeks ]The Self-Regulation of Eating Behavior Questionnaire (SREBQ) is a short, Likert format questionnaire comprising of two dichotomous screener questions, one directional question to bring tempting foods to mind, and five Likert-format items assessing respondents' self-regulation of eating. The five Likert-format items span a five-point scale from 'Never' to 'Always'. The SREBQ has been shown to be reliable and valid (Kliemann et al., 2016).
- MINDSENS (mindfulness) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 5 weeks ]a composite index consisting of selected items from two other mindfulness questionnaires (The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and Experiences Questionnaire) that showed the strongest response to practice.
- Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 5 weeks ]Interoceptive self-awareness. Interoception refers to the signaling and perception of internal bodily sensations, which we will assess using the validated Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) (Mehling et. al., 2009 and 2012). The MAIA is a relatively new scale, with good validity and reliability in studies to date (Mehling et. al., 2009 and 2012; Bornemann et. Al., 2014).
- Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 5 weeks ]) (Gross & John, 2003). The ERQ assesses two specific emotion regulation strategies, suppression and reappraisal. The ERQ comprises 10 items (5 for suppression and 5 for reappraisal) rated from 1 (never do this) to 7 (always do this). The ERQ has demonstrated strong psychometric properties (Spaapen et al., 2014).
- Experiences Questionnaire (decentering) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 5 weeks ]Decentering, a specific component of mindfulness related to learning how to separate from one's own thoughts and emotions, will be assessed with the Experiences Questionnaire (Fresco 2007).
- Rosenberg (1965) self-esteem scale (RSES) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 5 weeks ]a self-esteem measure widely used in social-science research, with a scale of 0 (low) to 30 (high). It is a ten-item Likert-type scale with items answered on a four-point scale-from strongly agree to strongly disagree. It has been used extensively in research and has demonstrated good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity.
- Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., C-reactive protein, IL-6, and TNF-α) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 5 weeks ]Saliva samples will be obtained in-person, during pre- and post- assessments. Saliva samples will be stored for analysis to be performed at a later date, pending funding. Future analysis on saliva will be limited to assays on stress and health-related biomarkers and inflammatory cytokines (i.e., C-reactive protein, IL-6, and TNF-α). The "passive drool" method will be used to collect saliva samples, as described in Walsh et al., 2016.
- State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 5 weeks ]Inventory aimed to measure one's awareness of their levels of both state and trait anxiety.
- Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC; Connor & Davidson, 2003) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 5 weeks ]The CD-RISC is a 25-item scale that measures the ability to cope with stress and adversity. Items include: "I am able to adapt when changes occur," "I tend to bounce back after illness, injury, or other hardships," and "I am able to handle unpleasant or painful feelings like sadness, fear, and anger." Respondents rate items on a scale from 0 ("not true at all") to 4 ("true nearly all the time"). A preliminary study of the psychometric properties of the CD-RISC in general population and patient samples showed it to have adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent and divergent validity (Connor & Davidson, 2003). This measure has been used in studies that assess resilience across the lifespan (Campbell-Sills et al., 2006).
- Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS4) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 5 weeks ](PSS4) is an abbreviated, 4-item Likert format scale designed to measure the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful (Cohen et al., 1983). The PSS is a validated, publicly available, and widely used psychological instrument for measuring stress. Each item asks the participant to appraise his or her feelings and thoughts using a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never, 4 = very often)
- Long-term Follow-up Survey [ Time Frame: 1, 6, and 12 months following completion of the satisfaction follow-up ]Simple 2 question survey will ask participants if they are still meditating, and if so, what tools they are using for assistance.
- Satisfaction with Mindfulness Tools [ Time Frame: 5 weeks ]After the completion of the 4-week trial, an 18-item instrument will be used to solicit participants' satisfaction with the meditation tools, as well as their feelings toward their meditation practice as a result of the intervention (i.e.,. confidence in ability, motivation to continue, and perceived benefits). The instrument was developed for this study and asks questions about perceived benefits of mindfulness meditation and intentions to continue practicing in the future.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03402009
|United States, Connecticut|
|University of Connecticut|
|Storrs, Connecticut, United States, 06269|
|Principal Investigator:||Blair T. Johnson, PhD||University of Connecticut - BOT Distinguished Professor of Psychological Sciences|