Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Loss of Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Lithium Disilicate Implant Hybrid Abutment Crowns in Esthetic Zone
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03333889|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified November 2017 by Inas Adel Mahmoud, Cairo University.
Recruitment status was: Not yet recruiting
First Posted : November 7, 2017
Last Update Posted : November 7, 2017
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Hybrid Crowns on Single Implants in Esthetic Zone||Other: Vita Enamic hybrid crown Other: emax hybrid crown||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||36 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)|
|Masking Description:||double blind :outcome asessor,participant|
|Official Title:||Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Loss of Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Lithium Disilicate Implant Hybrid Abutment Crowns in Esthetic Zone|
|Estimated Study Start Date :||January 2018|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||January 2019|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||April 2019|
Active Comparator: E-max hybrid crown
E-max hybrid crown Lithium Disilicate based ceramic which is characterized by high strength and optimum esthetics and considered a gold standard in anterior restorations
Other: emax hybrid crown
high srength glass ceramic that can be milled in sections up to 1mm .
Experimental: Vita Enamic hybrid crown
Vita Enamic hybrid crown polymer infilltrated ceramic network(hybrid ceramic) characterized by low modulus of elasticity that acts as cushion on implants.
Other: Vita Enamic hybrid crown
hybrid ceramic material in the form of mesoblocks where the ceramic block is attached to a ti base .The whole assembly is screw retained superstructure.
- patient satisfaction [ Time Frame: 12 months ]using visual analogue scale (o-unsatisfied up to max 10 satisfied)
- crestal bone loss [ Time Frame: 12 months ]using digital subtraction technique
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03333889
|Contact: Inas Mahmoud, assistant firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Reham El Basty, lecturer||01207169671||Reham.email@example.com|