Voices in Pain Care
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03301623|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : October 4, 2017
Last Update Posted : November 29, 2017
Investigators will compare Clinical Decision Support (CDS) versus Patient Education and Activation Tools (PEATs) in patients with an opioid prescription of six weeks or longer to measure outcomes that are important to patients. Primary outcomes are pain interference and satisfaction with patient-physician communication. Secondary outcomes are overall Health-Related Quality of Life and high-risk prescribing, including prescriptions over 90 morphine milligram equivalents and coprescribing of benzodiazepines and opioids.
Patients in the PEAT arm will receive patient materials during the intervention, developed to engage patients in chronic pain treatment, prior to Primary Care Physician office visits. In the provider-facing CDS arm, PCPs will receive computerized reminders about appropriate opioid use during office visits for enrolled patients. Patients in both groups will receive questionnaires about pain interference, quality of life, and physician-patient communication through the patient portal one month after each visit to their Primary Care Physician. Investigators will use multi-level regression models to compare the effectiveness of these two communication strategies.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Chronic Pain||Other: Clinical Decision Support Other: Patient Education and Activation Tools||Not Applicable|
Investigators will compare two strategies: (1) Engage PCPs with Clinical Decision Support at the point of care, raising active alerts through the Electronic Health Record (EHR) when there is risk of inappropriate opioid prescribing, thus leading to informed decision-making with the patient about alternative treatments; versus (2) Engage patients prior to their PCP visit using Patient Education and Activation Tools (PEATs) administered via REDCap, helping patients to prepare for their visit and encouraging discussion about treatment preferences, values and treatment goals at the time of the visit, thus leading to shared decision-making with the provider. Our CDS intervention will use "Choosing Wisely, " and CDC guidelines, and our Patient Education and Activation Tool intervention will use widely disseminated material developed by Consumer Reports and the ACPA. Informed Decision-Making (IDM) using EHR-based "Choosing Wisely" CDS alerts about appropriate opioid use, and (2) Shared Decision Making (SDM) using PEATs developed by the ACPA and Consumer Reports and delivered via REDCap. Investigators will assess whether improved communication and patient activation through these strategies improve patient-reported outcomes related to pain interference and HRQOL. To assess these outcomes, investigators will use NIH Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) questionnaires to capture health domains identified by our patient partners as most important. Using PROs will also help capture whether the use of either of these strategies leads to unintended consequences for patients when opioids are reduced and other pain management strategies - including non-pharmacological strategies - are not substituted.
Recruitment procedures: Once the study is approved, the study team will send emails to eligible study participants with consent form so they can enroll in the study and obtain informed consent. Participants who consent to be part of the study can then fill out the first study questionnaires.
Data collection: Upon enrollment, investigators will send eligible patients an enrollment questionnaire, which includes questions on: chronic pain condition, length of time in chronic pain, race and ethnicity, language proficiency, marital and cohabitation status, socioeconomic status, employment, history of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment, family history of addiction, surgical history related to chronic pain condition, past injuries related to chronic pain condition, diet, exercise, length of time with current primary care provider, health literacy, and knowledge about opioid medications. Investigators will also at this point send the five PROMIS questionnaires via REDCap. The study team will program the surveys to be sent via automatic email in REDCap. The email will contain a link where participants can access the questionnaires. The total time to take this questionnaire is 20 minutes.
All patients will take the PROMIS questionnaires before and after the intervention period for a total of 3-4 months pre-intervention and 1-year post-intervention. When the intervention period is initiated, all eligible patients who have any follow-up visits during this 12-month period in both study arms will be sent the questionnaires via REDCap one day after each office visit with their PCP the Communication Questionnaire (COMRADE).
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||1000 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||
The study team will randomize the study on the provider level and use a random number generator to assign providers to study arms.
Patients within the physicians randomized to the IDM arm will not receive the PEAT materials; their physicians will receive the CDS alerts via the EHR when certain order criteria are triggered appropriately.
Patients within the physicians randomized to SDM will receive the PEAT materials via REDCap two days before their PCP office visit. During the enrollment survey, they will be asked whether they prefer to receive the PEATS via email, text message, mail or any combination of the delivery methods and they will receive these materials every time they have an office visit with their PCP.
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Primary Purpose:||Health Services Research|
|Official Title:||Integrating the Patient Voice Into Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Communication Strategies in the Management of Chronic Pain|
|Actual Study Start Date :||November 13, 2017|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||September 1, 2019|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||March 13, 2020|
Experimental: Clinical Decision Support
Patients within the physicians randomized to the IDM arm will receive the Clinical Decision Support alerts via the EHR when certain order criteria are triggered appropriately.
Other: Clinical Decision Support
The CDS intervention will test the use of existing guideline-based EHR alerts related to the prescription of opioids. CDS alerts employ computer algorithms that account for patient characteristics and diagnoses to deliver reminders of appropriate use when a provider enters an order for a medication.
Experimental: Patient Education and Activation Tools
Patients within the physicians randomized to SDM will receive the PEAT materials via REDCap two days prior to their PCP office visit. During the enrollment survey, they will be asked whether they prefer to receive the PEATS via email, text message, mail or any combination of the delivery methods and they will receive these materials every time they have an office visit with their PCP.
Other: Patient Education and Activation Tools
The patient education materials selected for this study: "Pain Management: Which Treatment is Right for You," "Preparing for Your Health Care Visit," and a video from the American Chronic Pain Association (ACPA) named "A Car with Four Flat Tires," which helps to give patients a better understanding of how multi-modal treatment can be more effective than relying on one source of treatment (e.g., pain medication).
- Hierarchical Linear Model (Longitudinal Analysis) - Which communication strategy used is more effective in improving pain interference with patients' daily life for patients with chronic pain? [ Time Frame: 1 Year ]Dependent variable: Pain interference Independent variable: Comparator received
- Hierarchical Linear Model (Longitudinal Analysis)- Which communication strategy used is more effective in improving how satisfied patients feel after communicating with their physician about chronic pain treatment risks and benefits? [ Time Frame: 1 Year ]Dependent variable: COMRADE Scores Independent variable: Comparator received
- Hierarchical Linear Model- Which communication strategy used during the clinical encounter is more effective in improving patient's Health-Related Quality of Life? [ Time Frame: 1 Year ]Dependent variable: PROMIS Global Health Score Independent variable: Comparator received
- Hierarchical Generalized Linear Model - Which communication strategy used during the clinical encounter is more effective in reducing opioid prescriptions of more than 90 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME)? [ Time Frame: 1 Year ]Dependent variable: Opioid Prescription over 90MME Independent variable: Comparator received
- Hierarchical Generalized Linear Model - Which communication strategy used during the clinical encounter is more effective in reducing co-prescriptions of opioids and benzodiazepines? [ Time Frame: 1 Year ]Dependent variable: Opioids and Benzodiazepines Independent variable: Comparator received
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03301623
|Contact: Michelle S Keller, MPH, PhD (c)||310-248-8011 ext email@example.com|
|Contact: Mayra L Lopez, MSW, MPH||310-423-8943 ext firstname.lastname@example.org|
|United States, California|
|Cedars-Sinai Medical Center||Recruiting|
|Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048|
|Contact: Michelle Keller, MPH|
|Principal Investigator:||Brennan Spiegel, MD, MSHS||Cedars-Sinai Medical Center|