Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

COMPARISION OF DIFFERENT TREATMENT METHODS OF PERI-IMPLANTITIS

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03241953
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : August 8, 2017
Last Update Posted : August 8, 2017
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
ELİF ONCU, Necmettin Erbakan University

Brief Summary:
In this randomized, controlled study, 18 patients with peri-implantitis were included. A total of forty dental implants were debrided with either ultrasonic instruments (test, n=20) or plastic scaler (control, n=20). Gingival recession depth (RD), keratinized tissue width (KTW), probing depth (PD), Gingival Index (GI) were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. CBCT radiographs were used to evaluate peri-implant bone loss. Supportive and nonsurgical periodontal therapies were firstly consulted to reduce the inflammation, occurring due to the surgical treatments of the defects. The formation of bacterial biofilm on implant surfaces was removed by ultrasonic scaler and air polishing using abrasive powders or conventional plastic scaler with klorhegsidin combination.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Peri-Implantitis Periodontal Diseases Procedure: Periodontal surgery Not Applicable

  Show Detailed Description

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 18 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: COMPARISION OF DIFFERENT TREATMENT METHODS OF PERI-IMPLANTITIS
Actual Study Start Date : April 23, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date : November 20, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date : December 22, 2016

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: debridement made by ultrasonic tips
mechanical debridement made by ultrasonic polyetheretherketone coated tips developed for implant surface and combined air-flow debridement
Procedure: Periodontal surgery
A total of forty dental implants were debrided with either ultrasonic instruments (test, n=20) or plastic scaler (control, n=20). Gingival recession depth (RD), keratinized tissue width (KTW), probing depth (PD), Gingival Index (GI) were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. CBCT radiographs were used to evaluate peri-implant bone loss. Supportive and nonsurgical periodontal therapies were firstly consulted to reduce the inflammation, occurring due to the surgical treatments of the defects. The formation of bacterial biofilm on implant surfaces was removed by ultrasonic scaler and air polishing

Active Comparator: implants were debrided with standard plastic curettes
dental implants were debrided with standard plastic curettes, debridement made by combined klorhegsidin rinse
Procedure: Periodontal surgery
A total of forty dental implants were debrided with either ultrasonic instruments (test, n=20) or plastic scaler (control, n=20). Gingival recession depth (RD), keratinized tissue width (KTW), probing depth (PD), Gingival Index (GI) were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. CBCT radiographs were used to evaluate peri-implant bone loss. Supportive and nonsurgical periodontal therapies were firstly consulted to reduce the inflammation, occurring due to the surgical treatments of the defects. The formation of bacterial biofilm on implant surfaces was removed by ultrasonic scaler and air polishing




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Treatment results [ Time Frame: one year ]
    It was found in the study that the combined air-flow debridement and the mechanical debridement performed by using ultrasonic polyetheretherketone-coated tips developed for implant surface debridement in peri-implantitis therapy were better at decreasing the level of periodontal pocket depth than plastic curettes



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   30 Years to 70 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Gender Based Eligibility:   Yes
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

- The patients, who were systemically and periodontally healthy and free of parafunctional habits like bruxism, and didn't have any kind of periodontal therapy within the previous year and had implants for at least 5 years, were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patients with chronic bronchitis or asthma and major systemic illnesses (i.e. diabetes mellitus, cancer, HIV, bone metabolic diseases or disorders that compromise wound healing, radiation or immunosuppressive therapy) and those who had taken antibiotics, anti-inflammatory drugs or other medication within the previous 28 days were excluded in the study.

Additional Information:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: ELİF ONCU, Asist.Prof.Dr., Necmettin Erbakan University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03241953     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 2014-08
First Posted: August 8, 2017    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: August 8, 2017
Last Verified: August 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Periodontal Diseases
Peri-Implantitis
Mouth Diseases
Stomatognathic Diseases