DCb (Docetaxel/Carboplatin) Versus EC-D (Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxe) as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03154749
• Recruitment Status: Completed
• First Posted: May 16, 2017
• Last Update Posted: September 1, 2022
• Sponsor: Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
• Collaborators: Shantou Central Hospital; First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University; Henan Cancer Hospital; Dongguan People's Hospital; Baotou Cancer Hospital
• Information provided by (Responsible Party): Kun Wang, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Study Description

Brief Summary:

Both DCb (docetaxel/carboplatin) and EC followed by D (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxe) regimens as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer have been recommended by NCCN guideline. It is unknown which regimen is better. This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCb (docetaxel/carboplatin) and EC followed by D(epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxe) regimens as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Triple-Negative breast cancer. The endpoint of pathologic complete response is used as a surrogate marker for survival. Safety and tolerability assessed by number of grade 4 toxicities and hospitalizations.

Condition or disease	Intervention/treatment	Phase
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer	Drug: DCb (docetaxel/carboplatin) versus EC followed by D (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxe)	Phase 2

Detailed Description:

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype lacking estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) amplification. TNBC accounts for 15-20% of all invasive breast cancer. Although PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy may play a role in the treatment of early TNBC, the mainstay of treatment for TNBC is cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, despite its sensitivity to chemotherapy, TNBC is still associated with a poor prognosis.

TNBC is usually recommended for neoadjuvant therapy. The benefits of neoadjuvant therapy include reducing the size of the tumor to suit breast conserving surgery, avoiding axillary lymph node dissection, making inoperable tumors operable, and obtaining an in vivo evaluation of the tumor's chemosensitivity. Taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant regimens have become a standard treatment for TNBC, and patients have been proved to have better event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) who achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy1.

Carboplatin attack cancer cells by inducing double-stranded DNA breaks, and TNBC may be sensitive to carboplatin2. Previous studies have shown that adding carboplatin to neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens significantly improved pCR rate in TNBC patients3, 4.

Due to the long-term cardiotoxicity caused by anthracycline, several studies have explored the efficacy of neoadjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimens in TNBC and have achieved satisfactory pCR rates, but there are still controversies5. However, there is no study making comparisons between the combination of taxanes and carboplatin without anthracycline and the standard neoadjuvant regimens. Whether the combination of taxanes and carboplatin without anthracycline can achieve better efficacy while reducing adverse reactions still needs to be explored.

The NeoCART study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus carboplatin with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC.

Study Design

• Study Type: Interventional (Clinical Trial)
• Actual Enrollment: 93 participants
• Allocation: Randomized
• Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)
• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Official Title: Neoadjuvant Docetaxel + Carboplatin Versus Epirubicin+Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel in Triple-Negative, Early-Stage Breast Cancer (NeoCART): Study Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled, Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial
• Actual Study Start Date: September 1, 2016
• Actual Primary Completion Date: December 31, 2019
• Actual Study Completion Date: December 31, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/treatment
Experimental: DCb; Docetaxel (75 mg/m2 administered intravenously every 3 weeks) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] 6, intravenously every 3 weeks) for six cycles	Drug: DCb (docetaxel/carboplatin) versus EC followed by D (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxe); All eligible patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the experimental arm (docetaxel (75 mg/m2 administered intravenously every 3 weeks) plus carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL per min, intravenously every 3 weeks) for six cycles) or the standard treatment arm (epirubicin (90 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles).
Active Comparator: EC-D; Epirubicin (90 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles	Drug: DCb (docetaxel/carboplatin) versus EC followed by D (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxe); All eligible patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the experimental arm (docetaxel (75 mg/m2 administered intravenously every 3 weeks) plus carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL per min, intravenously every 3 weeks) for six cycles) or the standard treatment arm (epirubicin (90 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures :

1. PCR [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 27-30 weeks ]
   Local evaluation of pCR defined as the absence of any residual invasive cancer of the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes (i.e., ypT0/is, ypN0 in the current AJCC staging system)

Secondary Outcome Measures :

1. Breast-conserving surgery rate [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 27-30 weeks ]
   defined as the proportion of patients who achieved breast-conserving surgery out of the intent-to-treat (ITT) population of patients without inflammatory breast cancer
2. EFS [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 36 months ]
   defined as time from randomization to disease progression, disease recurrence (local, regional, distant, or contralateral [invasive or non-invasive]), or death from any cause
3. OS [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 36 months ]
   defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause
4. Adverse events [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 27-30 weeks ]
   Incidence, type, and severity of all adverse events (including serious adverse events) based on NCI CTCAE, v4.0.

Other Outcome Measures:

1. Candidate predictors of pCR [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 27-30 weeks ]
   BRCA, HRD, TILs，TMB, et al.

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Sexes Eligible for Study: Female
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Criteria

Eligibility Criteria：

Patients must meet the following criteria for study entry:

• Female, aged 18 Years to 70 Years
• Signed written informed consent approved by the study site Ethics Committee
• Histologically confirmed Triple-Negative invasive breast carcinoma：Pathologically confirmed as triple negative, defined as ER and PR expression both < 1 % of tumor cell nuclei per ASCO/CAP guidelinesa and HER2 negative per ASCO/CAP guidelinesa (IHC 0 or 1+ or FISH-, or IHC 2+ and FISH-)
• Stage at presentation: II - III (T1cN1-2 or T2-4N0-2)
• Patients must have measurable disease as defined by palpable lesion with caliper and/or a positive mammogram or ultrasound. Bilateral mammogram is required for study entry. Baseline measurements of the indicator lesions must be recorded on the Patient Registration Form. To be valid for baseline, the measurements must have been made within the 14 days if palpable. If not palpable, a mammogram or MRI must be done within 14 days. If palpable, a mammogram or MRI must be done within 2 months prior to study entry. If clinically indicated, x-rays and scans must be done within 28 days of study entry.
• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 1 within 14 days of study entry
• Adequate organ function within 2 weeks of study entry:

ANC ≥ 1500 cells/μL Platelet count ≥ 100,000 cells/μL Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL; patients may receive red blood cell transfusions to obtain this level Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) INR and (activated) partial thromboplastin time (aPTT/PTT) ≤ 1.5 ×ULN AST and ALT ≤ULN Serum total bilirubin ≤ ULN, except for patients with Gilbert's syndrome for whom direct bilirubin should be within the normal range Serum alkaline phosphatase ≤ULN

• Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test performed within 7 days prior to the start of treatment
• Women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (barrier method of birth control) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation

Exclusion Criteria：

Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from study entry:

• Stage IV (metastatic) breast cancer
• Patients with a history of invasive breast cancer.
• Patients with a history of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), except for patients treated exclusively with mastectomy > 5 years prior to diagnosis of current breast cancer
• Patients with bilateral breast cancer
• Prior chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, biologic therapy, investigational agent, targeted therapy or radiation therapy for current breast cancer.
• Patients who have undergone incisional and/or excisional biopsy of primary tumor and/or axillary lymph nodes
• History of previous or current malignancy at other sites with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Patients with a history of other malignancies, who remain disease free for greater than five years are eligible.
• Current severe, uncontrolled systemic disease that may interfere with planned treatment (e.g., clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease; wound-healing disorders)
• Major surgical procedure unrelated to breast cancer or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to randomization or anticipation of the need for major surgery during the course of study treatment
• Current pregnancy and/or breastfeeding

Contacts and Locations

Locations

China, Guangdong

Guangdong General Hospital

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080

Sponsors and Collaborators

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Shantou Central Hospital

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Henan Cancer Hospital

Dongguan People's Hospital

Baotou Cancer Hospital

Investigators

• Study Chair: Wang Kun, MD; Study Chair

More Information

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

Li WP, Zhu T, Hu MX, Yang M, Ji F, Gao HF, Yang CQ, Zhang LL, Cheng MY, Xu FP, Wang K. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of the EC-T (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) and TCb (docetaxel/carboplatin) neoadjuvant regimens in early TOP2A-normal stage II-III breast cancer. Neoplasma. 2020 Nov;67(6):1409-1415. doi: 10.4149/neo_2020_200130N96. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

• Responsible Party: Kun Wang, Professor, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03154749
• Other Study ID Numbers: 20170512
• First Posted: May 16, 2017
• Last Update Posted: September 1, 2022
• Last Verified: August 2022

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No

Keywords provided by Kun Wang, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital:

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Breast Neoplasms; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Neoplasms; Breast Diseases; Skin Diseases; Cyclophosphamide; Carboplatin; Docetaxel; Epirubicin; Immunosuppressive Agents; Immunologic Factors; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Antirheumatic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Alkylating Agents; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Antineoplastic Agents; Myeloablative Agonists; Tubulin Modulators; Antimitotic Agents; Mitosis Modulators; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Topoisomerase II Inhibitors; Topoisomerase Inhibitors; Enzyme Inhibitors