We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Study to Evaluate the Comparative Efficacy of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) and Secukinumab for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis (ECLIPSE)

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03090100
First Posted: March 24, 2017
Last Update Posted: November 2, 2017
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
  Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab compared with secukinumab for the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis.

Condition Intervention Phase
Psoriasis Drug: Guselkumab Drug: Placebo Drug: Secukinumab Phase 3

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Study Evaluating the Comparative Efficacy of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) and Secukinumab for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Janssen Research & Development, LLC:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Percentage of Participants who Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]
    The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90 percent (%) reduction in PASI relative to baseline.


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Percentage of Participants who Achieve PASI 75 Response at Both Week 12 and Week 48 [ Time Frame: At Week 12 and Week 48 ]
    The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

  • Percentage of Participants who Achieve PASI 90 Response at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90 percent (%) reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

  • Percentage of Participants who Achieve PASI 75 Response at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response is defined as a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

  • Percentage of Participants who Achieve PASI 100 Response at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]
    The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 100 response was defined as a 100% reduction in PASI relative to baseline i.e., a PASI score of 0.

  • Number of Participants who Achieve an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]
    The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).


Enrollment: 1048
Actual Study Start Date: April 27, 2017
Estimated Study Completion Date: November 23, 2018
Estimated Primary Completion Date: September 28, 2018 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Group I: Guselkumab Plus Placebo
Participants will receive 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections will be administered to maintain the blind.
Drug: Guselkumab
Participants will receive 1 injection of active guselkumab at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44.
Drug: Placebo
Participants will receive 1 injection of placebo at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44 and 2 injections of placebo at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40.
Active Comparator: Group II: Secukinumab
Participants will receive 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44.
Drug: Secukinumab
Participants will receive 2 injections of active secukinumab at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44.
Other Name: Cosentyx

Detailed Description:
The study consists of Screening Phase(4 weeks before administration of study drug),Active Treatment Phase(Week 0-Week 44),Follow Up Phase(Week 44-Week 56).During various study periods,safety assessments(example[e.g] recording of adverse events,Vital signs,Tuberculosis evaluation,Chest radiograph,Urine pregnancy Test);Efficacy assessments(e.g IGA,PASI);Clinical Laboratory Assessments(e.g haematology,chemistry);Biomarkers/Genetic evaluations,will be performed per the study procedures.The primary hypotheses are that guselkumab treatment is non-inferior to secukinumab as assessed by proportion of participants achieving PASI 90 response at Week 48 with noninferiority margin of 10% and,once non-inferiority is established,that guselkumab is superior to secukinumab as assessed by proportion of participants achieving PASI 90 response at Week 48.
  Eligibility

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis (with or without [Psoriatic Arthritis]PsA) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study drug
  • A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and at Week 0 and agree to urine pregnancy testing before receiving injections
  • Agree not to receive a live virus or live bacterial vaccination during the study, or within 3 months after the last administration of study drug
  • Agree not to receive a Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination during the study, or within 12 months after the last administration of study drug
  • Agree to avoid prolonged sun exposure and avoid use of tanning booths or other ultraviolet light sources during study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a history or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Has previously received guselkumab or secukinumab
  • Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including but not limited to chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (example bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic nonremitting cystitis), fungal infection (mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers
  • Has a history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly
  • Is unable or unwilling to undergo multiple venipunctures because of poor tolerability or lack of easy access to veins
  Contacts and Locations
Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03090100


  Show 142 Study Locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Investigators
Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial Janssen Research & Development, LLC
  More Information

Responsible Party: Janssen Research & Development, LLC
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03090100     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: CR108278
2016-002995-29 ( EudraCT Number )
CNTO1959PSO3009 ( Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC )
First Submitted: March 22, 2017
First Posted: March 24, 2017
Last Update Posted: November 2, 2017
Last Verified: October 2017

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Psoriasis
Skin Diseases, Papulosquamous
Skin Diseases
Antibodies, Monoclonal
Immunologic Factors
Physiological Effects of Drugs