A Novel Mechanics-based Intervention to Improve Post-stroke Stability
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02964039 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : November 15, 2016
Results First Posted : July 28, 2021
Last Update Posted : December 2, 2021
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Stroke | Behavioral: Error reduction Behavioral: Error augmentation Behavioral: Activity matched control | Not Applicable |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 54 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | A Novel Mechanics-based Intervention to Improve Post-stroke Gait Stability |
Actual Study Start Date : | April 1, 2017 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | March 31, 2020 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | March 31, 2020 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Error reduction
Participants will complete a 12-week training program, in which they practice walking on a treadmill for 30-minutes during twice-weekly training sessions. During these sessions, participants will interface with a custom-built force-field able to exert mediolateral forces on the legs, which will be in "error reduction" mode. This training period will be followed by a 12-week follow-up period. Five assessment sessions will be interspersed throughout this total 24-week period.
|
Behavioral: Error reduction
During training sessions, a custom-built force-field will exert forces on the legs while participants walk. These forces will push the legs toward mechanically-appropriate mediolateral locations, having the effect of reducing the errors in foot placement that are often present among individuals who have experienced a stroke. |
Experimental: Error augmentation
Participants will complete a 12-week training program, in which they practice walking on a treadmill for 30-minutes during twice-weekly training sessions. During these sessions, participants will interface with a custom-built force-field able to exert mediolateral forces on the legs, which will be in "error augmentation" mode. This training period will be followed by a 12-week follow-up period. Five assessment sessions will be interspersed throughout this total 24-week period.
|
Behavioral: Error augmentation
During training sessions, a custom-built force-field will exert forces on the legs while participants walk. These forces will push the legs away from mechanically-appropriate mediolateral locations, having the effect of amplifying the errors in foot placement that are often present among individuals who have experienced a stroke. |
Sham Comparator: Activity matched control
Participants will complete a 12-week training program, in which they practice walking on a treadmill for 30-minutes during twice-weekly training sessions. During these sessions, participants will interface with a custom-built force-field able to exert mediolateral forces on the legs, which will be in "transparent" mode. This training period will be followed by a 12-week follow-up period. Five assessment sessions will be interspersed throughout this total 24-week period.
|
Behavioral: Activity matched control
During training sessions, participants will interface with a custom-built force-field while they walk. The force-field will essentially get out of the way, producing minimal forces on the legs, and having no direct effect on the errors in foot placement that are often present among individuals who have experienced a stroke. |
- Partial Correlation Between Pelvis Displacement and Paretic Step Width During Gait (Change From Baseline) [ Time Frame: baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks ]
A custom measure that quantifies the strength of the relationship between body mechanics and foot placement. This measure falls within a relatively narrow range among neurologically intact controls, but is substantially reduced in some individuals who have experienced a stroke, indicating a reduced ability to stabilize their gait pattern. This measure relates the mechanical state of the body at the start of each step (mediolateral pelvis displacement and velocity of the pelvis relative to the stance foot) to the step width at the end of the step. Specifically, the partial linear correlation between pelvis displacement and step width was calculated, accounting for variation in pelvis velocity.
The change in this measure relative to baseline is calculated at four time points (after 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks).
- Functional Gait Assessment (Change From Baseline) [ Time Frame: baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks ]
A commonly-used clinical test to quantify balance and stability during various walking tasks. The minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 30, and higher scores indicate better outcomes. The total maximum value of 30 is calculated as the sum of 10 subscores, each of which has a scoring range of 0-3 and represents a distinct walking task.
The change in this measure relative to baseline is calculated at four time points (after 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks).
- Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (Change From Baseline) [ Time Frame: baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks ]
A commonly-used clinical scale that quantifies an individual's confidence in performing various tasks requiring balance. The minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 100, and higher scores indicate a better outcome. The overall score is calculated as the mean of 16 subscores, each of which can range of 0 to 100 and represents self-efficacy at a distinct movement task.
The change in this measure relative to baseline is calculated at four time points (after 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks).
- 10-meter Walk Test (Change From Baseline) [ Time Frame: baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks ]
A commonly-used clinical test to quantify general gait function. Walking speed is measured during the middle 6-meter portion of a 10-meter straight line path.
The change in this measure relative to baseline is calculated at four time points (after 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks).
- Fall Incidence [ Time Frame: 6 months (during 12 week follow-up period) ]Self-report history of fall occurrence, quantified by the average number of falls per participant in each group during the 12-week period that followed completion of the study's intervention component
- Fear of Falling [ Time Frame: 6 months (at completion of 12-week Follow-up period) ]Self-report statement of whether a participant has a fear of falling

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 21 years old
- Experience of a stroke 6 months prior to participation
- Preferred overground gait speed of at least 0.2 m/s
- Ability to walk at self-selected speed for 3 minutes without a cane or walker
- Provision of informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Resting heart rate above 110 beats/min
- Resting blood pressure higher than 200/110 mm Hg
- History of congestive heart failure, unstable cardiac arrhythmias, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, severe aortic stenosis, angina or dyspnea at rest or during activities of daily living
- Preexisting neurological disorders or dementia
- History of major head trauma
- Legal blindness or severe visual impairment
- Life expectancy <1 yr; 8)
- History of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism within 6 months
- Uncontrolled diabetes with recent weight loss, diabetic coma, or frequent insulin reactions
- Orthopedic injuries or conditions (e.g. joint replacements) in the lower extremities with the potential to alter the gait pattern.

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02964039
United States, South Carolina | |
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC | |
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29401-5799 |
Principal Investigator: | Jesse C. Dean, PhD | Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC |
Documents provided by VA Office of Research and Development:
Responsible Party: | VA Office of Research and Development |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02964039 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
N2256-R RX002256 ( Other Grant/Funding Number: VA ORD ) |
First Posted: | November 15, 2016 Key Record Dates |
Results First Posted: | July 28, 2021 |
Last Update Posted: | December 2, 2021 |
Last Verified: | December 2021 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | Yes |
Plan Description: | De-identified, anonymized data sets will be available to other investigators or members of the public upon request. These data sets will be made available upon completion of data collection, processing, and initial statistical analyses. The data sets will include physiological measures related to functional mobility, as well as the results of clinical tests. |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: | No |
stroke rehabilitation gait |
Stroke Cerebrovascular Disorders Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases |
Nervous System Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |