Don't get left behind! The modernized ClinicalTrials.gov is coming. Check it out now.
Say goodbye to ClinicalTrials.gov!
The new site is coming soon - go to the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Study to Compare Oral PF-06651600, PF-06700841 and Placebo in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02958865
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : November 8, 2016
Results First Posted : July 21, 2022
Last Update Posted : July 21, 2022
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Pfizer

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to determine whether PF-06651600 and PF-06700841 are effective in treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Ulcerative Colitis Drug: PF-06651600 or Placebo Drug: PF-06700841 or Placebo Drug: PF-06700841 Drug: PF-06651600 Phase 2

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 319 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A PHASE 2B, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP, DOSE RANGING STUDY OF ORAL PF-06651600 AND PF-06700841 AS INDUCTION AND CHRONIC THERAPY IN SUBJECTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE ULCERATIVE COLITIS
Actual Study Start Date : February 3, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date : May 10, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date : May 10, 2021


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: PF-06651600 Drug Dose Level 1
Delivered orally for 8 weeks
Drug: PF-06651600 or Placebo
Delivered orally for 8 weeks.

Experimental: PF-06651600 Drug Dose Level 2
Delivered orally for 8 weeks
Drug: PF-06651600 or Placebo
Delivered orally for 8 weeks.

Experimental: PF-06651600 Drug Dose Level 3
Delivered orally for 8 weeks.
Drug: PF-06651600 or Placebo
Delivered orally for 8 weeks.

Placebo Comparator: PF-06651600 Placebo
Delivered orally for 8 weeks.
Drug: PF-06651600 or Placebo
Delivered orally for 8 weeks.

Experimental: PF-06700841 Drug Dose Level 1
Delivered orally for 8 weeks
Drug: PF-06700841 or Placebo
Delivered orally for 8 weeks.

Experimental: PF-06700841 Drug Dose Level 2
Delivered orally for 8 weeks.
Drug: PF-06700841 or Placebo
Delivered orally for 8 weeks.

Experimental: PF-06700841 Drug Dose Level 3
Delivered orally for 8 weeks.
Drug: PF-06700841 or Placebo
Delivered orally for 8 weeks.

Placebo Comparator: PF-06700841 Placebo
Delivered orally for 8 weeks.
Drug: PF-06700841 or Placebo
Delivered orally for 8 weeks.

Experimental: PF-06651600 Drug Dose Level 4
Delivered orally for 24 weeks.
Drug: PF-06651600
Delivered orally for 24 weeks.

Experimental: PF-06700841 Drug Dose Level 4
Delivered orally for 24 weeks.
Drug: PF-06700841
Delivered orally for 24 weeks.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Total Mayo Score at Week 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Week 8 ]
    The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo scoring system ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, which are stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscore graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicates more severe disease activity and lower score denotes improvement of disease activity as measured by the total Mayo score.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs and Discontinuation Due to AEs (Chronic Period) [ Time Frame: From Week 8 up to Week 32 ]
    An AE was an untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening experience, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. All AEs mentioned below are treatment-emergent AEs.

  2. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Chronic Period) [ Time Frame: From Week 8 to Week 32 ]
    The number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting the pre-specified criteria defined in the study protocol while on study treatment or during lag time are reported here. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to receiving study treatment. Laboratory data included hematology test, serum chemistry test, C-creative protein and viral surveillance.

  3. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities-hematology (Chronic Period) [ Time Frame: From Week 8 to Week 32 ]
    The number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time are reported here. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to receiving study treatment. The list of hematology test parameters were as follows: hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, total neutrophils (absolute, Abs), eosinophils (Abs), monocytes (Abs), basophils (Abs), lymphocytes (Abs), prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR)/partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and reticulocytes (% and Abs). Percentages are displayed for the laboratory tests having a category with greater or equal to 1 evaluable participant.

  4. Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Data (Chronic Period) [ Time Frame: From Week 8 to Week 32 ]
    The vital signs data included the single sitting blood pressure, pulse rate and temperature. The criteria of vital sign abnormality are indicated below.

  5. Number of Participants With Abnormal ECG Findings (Chronic Period) [ Time Frame: Week 8 to Week 32 ]
    The number of participants with abnormal ECG findings during the chronic period (from Week 9 to Week 32) are reported below.

  6. Number of Participants With Serious Infections (Chronic Period) [ Time Frame: Week 8 to Week 32 ]
    Serious infections was defined as any infection (for example, viral, bacterial, and fungal) requiring hospitalization or parenteral antimicrobials.

  7. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities-clinical Chemistry (Chronic Period) [ Time Frame: Week 8 to Week 32 ]
    The number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time are reported here. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to receiving study treatment. The list of serum chemistry test parameters were as follows: blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, cystatin C, glucose, calcium, sodium, potassium, gamma glutamyl transferase, chloride, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein, creatine kinase (CK), total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoproteins (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL).

  8. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities-urinalysis (Chronic Period) [ Time Frame: Week 8 to Week 32 ]
    The number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time are reported here. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to receiving study treatment. The list of urinalysis test parameters were as follows:pH, glucose (qual), protein (qual), blood (qual), ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, microscopy, and spot urine albumin/creatinine ratio. The criteria of laboratory abnormality is defined as one of the following conditions was met: 1)associated with accompanying symptoms;2)Test result requires additional diagnostic testing or medical/surgical intervention;3)Test result leads to a change in study dosing (outside of any protocol specified dose adjustments) or discontinuation from the study, significant additional concomitant drug treatment, or other therapy;4)Test result is considered to be an AE by the investigator or sponsor.

  9. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuation Due to AEs (All-causalities) (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Week 8 ]
    An AE was an untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening experience, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. All AEs mentioned below are treatment-emergent AEs.

  10. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Week 8 ]
    The number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting the pre-specified criteria defined in the study protocol while on study treatment or during lag time are reported here. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to receiving study treatment. Laboratory data included hematology test, serum chemistry test, C-creative protein and viral surveillance. The criteria of laboratory abnormality is defined as one of the following conditions was met: 1)associated with accompanying symptoms;2)Test result requires additional diagnostic testing or medical/surgical intervention;3)Test result leads to a change in study dosing (outside of any protocol specified dose adjustments) or discontinuation from the study, significant additional concomitant drug treatment, or other therapy;4)Test result is considered to be an AE by the investigator or sponsor.

  11. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities-hematology (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Week 8 ]
    The number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time are reported here. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to receiving study treatment. The list of hematology test parameters were as follows: hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, total neutrophils (absolute, Abs), eosinophils (Abs), monocytes (Abs), basophils (Abs), lymphocytes (Abs), prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR)/partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and reticulocytes (% and Abs). Percentages are displayed for the laboratory tests having a category with greater or equal to 1 evaluable participant.

  12. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities-clinical Chemistry (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Week 8 ]
    The number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time are reported here. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to receiving study treatment. The list of serum chemistry test parameters were as follows: blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, cystatin C, glucose, calcium, sodium, potassium, gamma glutamyl transferase, chloride, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein, creatine kinase (CK), total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoproteins (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)

  13. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities- Urinalysis (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Week 8 ]
    The number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time are reported here. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to receiving study treatment. The list of urinalysis test parameters were as follows:pH, glucose (qual), protein (qual), blood (qual), ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, microscopy, and spot urine albumin/creatinine ratio. The criteria of laboratory abnormality is defined as one of the following conditions was met: 1)associated with accompanying symptoms;2)Test result requires additional diagnostic testing or medical/surgical intervention;3)Test result leads to a change in study dosing (outside of any protocol specified dose adjustments) or discontinuation from the study, significant additional concomitant drug treatment, or other therapy;4)Test result is considered to be an AE by the investigator or sponsor.

  14. Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Data (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: From screening to Week 8 ]
    The vital signs data included the single sitting blood pressure, pulse rate and temperature. The criteria of vital sign abnormality are indicated below.

  15. Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: From screening to Week 8 ]
    The number of participants with abnormal ECG findings during the induction period (from Day 1 to Week 8) are reported below. The criteria of test abnormality is defined as one of the following conditions was met: 1)associated with accompanying symptoms;2)Test result requires additional diagnostic testing or medical/surgical intervention;3)Test result leads to a change in study dosing (outside of any protocol specified dose adjustments) or discontinuation from the study, significant additional concomitant drug treatment, or other therapy;4)Test result is considered to be an AE by the investigator or sponsor.

  16. Number of Participants With Serious Infections (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Week 8 ]
    Serious infections was defined as any infection (for example, viral, bacterial, and fungal) requiring hospitalization or parenteral antimicrobials including Listeria encephalitis, Pneumonia, Viral infection.

  17. Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission Based on Total Mayo Score at Week 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Week 8 ]
    The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo scoring system ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, which are stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscore graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as total Mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.

  18. Percentage of Participants Achieving Improvement in Endoscopic Appearance Based on Total Mayo Score at Week 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Week 8 ]
    The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo scoring system ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, which are stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscore graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Improvement in endoscopic subscore appearance was defined at Mayo endoscopic subscore of ≤1.

  19. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Based on Total Mayo Score at Week 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Week 8 ]
    The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo scoring system ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, which are stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscore graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Clinical response was defined as decrease from baseline in total Mayo score of at least 3 points and at least 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the subscore for rectal bleeding of at least 1 point or absolute subscore for rectal bleeding of 0 or 1.

  20. Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission Based on Total Mayo Score at Week 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Week 8 ]
    The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo scoring system ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, which are stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscore graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Endoscopic remission was defined as endoscopic subscore of 0.

  21. Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission Based on Total Mayo Score at Week 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Week 8 ]
    The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo scoring system ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, which are stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscore graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Symptomatic remission was defined as total Mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point, and both rectal bleeding and stool frequency subscores of 0.

  22. Percentage of Participants Achieving Deep Remission Based on Total Mayo Score at Week 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Week 8 ]
    The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo scoring system ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, which are stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscore graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Deep remission was defined as total Mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a zero on both endoscopic and rectal bleeding subscore.

  23. Partial Mayo Score and Change From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4 and 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8 ]
    The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo scoring system ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, which are stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscore graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. The partial Mayo score does not incorporate the endoscopy score and the partial Mayo score ranges from 0 to 9.

  24. Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Week 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8 ]
    The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo scoring system ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, which are stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscore graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity.

  25. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Domain Score and Total Score at Weeks 4 and 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Week 4 and Week 8 ]
    IBDQ is a psychometrically validated patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument for measuring the disease specific quality of life in participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The IBDQ is comprised of 32 items, which are grouped into 4 dimensions: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: Bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; Systemic symptoms: 5 to 35.; Emotional function: 12 to 84; Social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicates better quality of life.

  26. Change From Baseline in IBDQ Total Score at Weeks 4 and 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 8 ]
    IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring the disease specific quality of life in participants with IBD. The IBDQ is comprised of 32 items, which are grouped into 4 dimensions: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: Bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; Systemic symptoms: 5 to 35.; Emotional function: 12 to 84; Social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicates better quality of life. Baseline value is defined as the last non-missing measurement collected prior to or on Day 1.

  27. Percentage of Participants With IBDQ Total Score Greater Than or Equal to 170 at Weeks 4 and 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Week 4 and Week 8 ]
    IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring the disease specific quality of life in participants with IBD. The IBDQ is comprised of 32 items, which are grouped into 4 dimensions: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: Bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; Systemic symptoms: 5 to 35.; Emotional function: 12 to 84; Social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicates better quality of life.

  28. Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 16 Points Increase in IBDQ Total Score From Baseline at Weeks 4 and 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4 and 8 ]
    IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring the disease specific quality of life in participants with IBD. The IBDQ is comprised of 32 items, which are grouped into 4 dimensions: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: Bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; Systemic symptoms: 5 to 35.; Emotional function: 12 to 84; Social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicates better quality of life.

  29. Percentage of Participants With Improvement in IBDQ Bowel Symptom Domain at Weeks 4 and 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Week 4 and Week 8 ]
    IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring the disease specific quality of life in participants with IBD. The IBDQ is comprised of 32 items, which are grouped into 4 dimensions: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: Bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; Systemic symptoms: 5 to 35.; Emotional function: 12 to 84; Social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicates better quality of life. The improvement in IBDQ bowel symptom domain was defined as an increase of ≥1.2 points from baseline in average score among bowel symptoms domain (items 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 20, 22, 24, 26, 29).

  30. Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) Acute Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score and Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Weeks 4 and 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Week 4 and Week 8 ]
    The SF-36 version 2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure. It measures 8 general health concepts or domains: Physical Functioning (PF), Role-Physical (RP), Bodily Pain (BP), General Health (GH), Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Role-Emotional (RE), and Mental Health (MH). These 8 domains can also be summarized as physical and mental component scores. The summary component scores, Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS), are based on a normalized sum of the 8 scale scores PF, RP, BP, GH, VT, SF, RE, and MH . All domains and summary components are scored such that a higher score indicates a higher functioning or health level. The minimum and maximum scores of the PCS Score are 6.1 and 79.7, respectively. The minimum and maximum scores of the MCS Score are -3.8 and 78.7, respectively.

  31. Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire 5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D 3L) Utility Score and EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Weeks 4 and 8 (Induction Period) [ Time Frame: Week 4 and Week 8 ]
    For EQ-5D 3L, participant rated questionnaire to assess generic health status in two parts: single utility score and visual analog scale. For utility score, participants rated their current health state on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression with each dimension having three levels of function: 1 indicates no problem; 2 indicates some problem; 3 indicates extreme problem. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score was transformed and results in a total score range of 0.05 to 1.00; higher scores indicating a better health state. The EQ-5D VAS records the respondent's self rated health on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

  32. Total Mayo Score at Week 32 (Chronic Period) [ Time Frame: Week 32 ]
    The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo scoring system ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, which are stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscore graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity.

  33. Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission Based on Total Mayo Score at Week 32 (Chronic Period) [ Time Frame: Week 32 ]
    The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo scoring system ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, which are stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscore graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as total Mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.

  34. Percentage of Participants Achieving Improvement in Endoscopic Appearance Based on Mayo Score at Week 32 (Chronic Period) [ Time Frame: Week 32 ]
    The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo scoring system ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, which are stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscore graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Improvement in endoscopic appearance was defined at Mayo endoscopic subscore of ≤1.


Other Outcome Measures:
  1. Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Week 32 (Chronic Period) [ Time Frame: Week 32 ]
    The Mayo Score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo scoring system ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores, which are stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscore graded 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 75 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of ulcerative colitis for greater than/equal to 3 months.
  • Moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis
  • Inadequate response to, loss of response to, or intolerance to at least one conventional therapy for UC.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Clinical findings suggestive of Crohn's Disease
  • History of bowel surgery within 6 months

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02958865


Locations
Show Show 189 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Pfizer
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center Pfizer
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by Pfizer:
Study Protocol  [PDF] November 18, 2020
Statistical Analysis Plan  [PDF] May 5, 2021

Additional Information:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Pfizer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02958865    
Other Study ID Numbers: B7981005
VIBRATO ( Other Identifier: Alias Study Number )
2016-003708-29 ( EudraCT Number )
First Posted: November 8, 2016    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: July 21, 2022
Last Update Posted: July 21, 2022
Last Verified: June 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
URL: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Pfizer:
Mayo score
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Colitis
Colitis, Ulcerative
Ulcer
Gastroenteritis
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Digestive System Diseases
Colonic Diseases
Intestinal Diseases
Pathologic Processes
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
PF-06700841
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
Enzyme Inhibitors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action