Effect of Music on Reading Comprehension for Patients With Aphasia (EMRA1)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02875938|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : August 23, 2016
Last Update Posted : February 16, 2018
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Aphasia||Behavioral: Simultaneous music and reading lyrics Behavioral: Priming with music Behavioral: Control||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||1 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Effect of Music on Reading Comprehension for Patients With Aphasia|
|Actual Study Start Date :||July 2016|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||July 2017|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||August 2017|
Experimental: Music and reading lyrics
A single-subject adapted alternating treatment design will be used to compare two music conditions, using music with sung lyrics simultaneously with silent reading of the lyrics, and priming with music and sung lyrics followed by reading of the lyrics, with a control condition using reading materials without music.
Behavioral: Simultaneous music and reading lyrics
music with sung lyrics simultaneously with silent reading of the lyrics.Behavioral: Priming with music
priming with music and sung lyrics followed by reading of the lyrics.Behavioral: Control
control condition using reading materials without music.
- Percent correct responses per day on phrase completion task. [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year ]Differential response to the interventions (counted as the percent correct responses per day.
- Number of sessions required to achieve mastery. [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year ]count number of sessions.
- Retention of the reading material [ Time Frame: 3 weeks post-intervention. ]Number of items recalled.
- International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Body Functions/Structures, Activities, and Participation [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year ]Pretest/post-test information on the ICF Body Functions/Structures, Activities, and Participation (Hurkmans et al. 2011).
- Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination-Third Edition (BDAE-3) [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year ]The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination-Third Edition (BDAE-3) (Goodglass, Harold, & Barresi, Austin: PRO-Ed.): Pretest reading scores on the BDAE full version subtests, i.e. B. Word Identification: 1. Word-Picture Match, and 2. Lexical Decision; C. 1. Homophone Matching; D. Derivational and Grammatical Morphology: 1. Matching to spoken sample; E. Oral Reading: 1. Basic oral word reading; F. Oral Reading of Sentences with Comprehension; and G. Reading Comprehension-Sentences and Paragraphs; will be completed prior to baseline A and initiating intervention, and immediately following completion of intervention to assess generalization to non-trained stimuli.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02875938
|United States, Virginia|
|Carilion Franklin Memorial Hospital|
|Rocky Mount, Virginia, United States, 24151|
|Principal Investigator:||Jacqueline A. Treichler, MS, CCC-SLP||Carilion Clinic|