Mobile Messages Affects Adherence of Stent Removal or Exchange in Patients With Benign Pancreaticobiliary Diseases
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02831127|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 13, 2016
Last Update Posted : July 13, 2016
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Healthy||Other: short message service group Other: conventional group||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||48 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||Mobile Phone Reminder Messages Improves the Adherence of Stent Removal or Exchange in Patients With Benign Pancreaticobiliary Diseases|
|Study Start Date :||February 2012|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||October 2013|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||October 2013|
Experimental: short message service group
Patients in this arm received conventional instructions plus short message reminder.
Other: short message service group
Each month after stent implantation, the investigator sent a text message by SMS to inform patients the necessity of regular stent removal/exchange and the disadvantage of delayed management, and to remind them the appropriate date to come back to the hospital for stent management. Patients were requested to respond by SMS and were encouraged to contact the investigator if they had any questions about stent management. Besides, patients received conventional reminder:After stent implantation, all patients received oral and written instructions about further management. If single or multiple plastic stents were inserted, patients were informed to come back to the hospital at 3 months for stent removal/exchange; if FCSEMS was inserted, they were informed to come back to the hospital at 6 months after ERCP.
Active Comparator: conventional group
Patients in this arm just received conventional instructions.
Other: conventional group
After stent implantation, all patients received oral and written instructions about further management. If single or multiple plastic stents were inserted, patients were informed to come back to the hospital at 3 months for stent removal/exchange; if FCSEMS was inserted, they were informed to come back to the hospital at 6 months after ERCP.
- Adherence rate of biliary stent removal/exchange [ Time Frame: up to 1 year ]Percentage of patients adherence to stent removal/exchange within appropriate time
- Stent-associated adverse event [ Time Frame: 1 year ]Percentage of patients with stent-related adverse events, including cholangitis, stent migration and abdominal pain
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02831127
|Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases|
|Xi'an, Shanxi, China, 710032|
|Principal Investigator:||Yanglin Pan, MD||Xijing Hospital of Disgestive Diseases.The Fourth Military University|